Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The Primary Indication
Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy is the standard of care for PD-L1-positive (CPS ≥10) metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in the first-line setting, and pembrolizumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab is the standard for high-risk early-stage TNBC regardless of PD-L1 status. 1, 2, 3
Metastatic TNBC: First-Line Treatment Algorithm
Step 1: Mandatory PD-L1 Testing
- All patients with locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic TNBC must undergo PD-L1 testing using an FDA-approved companion diagnostic before treatment decisions 1, 2
- For pembrolizumab: Use the 22C3 assay with Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥10 cutoff 1, 2
- For atezolizumab: Use the SP142 assay with ≥1% immune cell staining cutoff 1, 2
- Critical pitfall: These assays are NOT interchangeable—different antibodies and scoring systems yield different results 1, 2
Step 2: Treatment Selection Based on PD-L1 Status
For PD-L1-Positive Disease (CPS ≥10):
- Pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine-carboplatin) 1, 3
- Alternative: Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for PD-L1 ≥1% on immune cells 1, 2
For PD-L1-Negative Disease:
- Single-agent chemotherapy is preferred—taxanes if not previously used in adjuvant setting 1, 5
- Do NOT use immunotherapy 1
Step 3: Critical Timing Restriction
- Immunotherapy is ONLY indicated if metastatic disease developed de novo OR at least 12 months after completion of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy 2, 5
- If disease recurred within 12 months of completing adjuvant therapy, immunotherapy is contraindicated—proceed directly to chemotherapy alone 2
Early-Stage TNBC: Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Setting
Pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab monotherapy after surgery for up to 9 cycles total 3, 6, 7
- This is the standard of care for high-risk early-stage TNBC 2, 8
- Key difference from metastatic setting: PD-L1 testing is NOT required—benefit is independent of PD-L1 status 2, 8
- Improves event-free survival regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression 6, 8
Later-Line Treatment for Metastatic TNBC
Pembrolizumab monotherapy is NOT recommended in second-line or beyond 1, 2
- The KEYNOTE-119 trial showed no OS benefit for pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy in second/third-line setting (HR 0.97,95% CI 0.82-1.15) 1
- Even in PD-L1 CPS ≥10 subgroup, no significant OS improvement (HR 0.78, P=0.057) 1
- Immunotherapy MUST be combined with chemotherapy in first-line setting only 2
After ≥2 prior therapies, switch to sacituzumab govitecan (not immunotherapy), which improves median PFS to 5.6 months versus 1.7 months with chemotherapy (HR 0.41, P<0.0001) 5, 4
Immune-Related Adverse Events: Monitoring Requirements
- Grade 3+ immune-related adverse events occur in 5% of patients receiving pembrolizumab-chemotherapy versus 0% with chemotherapy alone 1
- Any-grade immune-mediated events occur in 26% with pembrolizumab-chemotherapy versus 6% with placebo-chemotherapy 1
- Thyroid disease occurs in 23% of patients receiving atezolizumab 4
- Monitor vigilantly for immune-related toxicities affecting any organ system 4
HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: No Approved Indication
Immunotherapy should NOT be used in routine clinical practice for HER2-positive breast cancer outside clinical trials 1, 2
- ESMO provides Level III evidence, Grade D recommendation with 85% consensus against routine use 2
- Pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab produced objective responses in PD-L1-positive tumors with trastuzumab-resistant disease in early studies, but this remains investigational 2
- No survival benefit has been demonstrated to support routine use 1, 2
Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: No Approved Indication
Immunotherapy should NOT be used in routine clinical practice for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer outside clinical trials 1, 2
- ESMO provides Level III evidence, Grade D recommendation with 85% consensus against routine use 2
- Several ongoing trials are evaluating immunotherapy in this population, but current evidence does not support use 2
- Standard endocrine therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors remains the backbone of treatment 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Pitfall 1: Using Wrong PD-L1 Assay
- SP142 assay is ONLY for atezolizumab (≥1% immune cell staining cutoff) 2
- 22C3 assay is ONLY for pembrolizumab (CPS ≥10 cutoff) 2
- These are not interchangeable—using the wrong assay invalidates treatment eligibility 1, 2
Pitfall 2: Ignoring Timing Restrictions
- Do NOT initiate immunotherapy if disease recurred within 12 months of completing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy 2, 5
- This is an absolute exclusion criterion for immunotherapy benefit 2
Pitfall 3: Using Immunotherapy Monotherapy in Later Lines
- Pembrolizumab monotherapy has low response rates in second/third-line setting 1, 2
- Immunotherapy MUST be combined with chemotherapy and used in first-line setting only 2
Pitfall 4: Requiring PD-L1 Testing in Neoadjuvant Setting
- For early-stage TNBC receiving neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, PD-L1 testing is NOT required 2, 8
- Benefit is independent of PD-L1 status in the curative setting 2, 8
Pitfall 5: Using Immunotherapy in Non-TNBC Subtypes