When to Prefer Titmus Fly Chart Over Other Stereopsis Tests
The Titmus Fly test should be reserved primarily for rapid screening of coarse stereopsis (3000 arcseconds) in cooperative children ≥4 years old, but only when using a modified two-step protocol to eliminate false positives, and it should NOT be used as a standalone test for quantifying stereoacuity or detecting amblyopia/strabismus.
Primary Clinical Indication
The Titmus Fly is best suited for quick initial assessment of whether gross stereopsis is present or absent in the clinical setting, particularly when:
- Screening young children (4+ years) for coarse stereopsis, as coarse stereopsis is fully mature by age 4 years 1
- Time constraints require rapid assessment of basic depth perception capability
- Patient cooperation is limited and you need a simple, engaging test (the fly image is appealing to children)
Critical Limitation: High False-Positive Rate
The standard Titmus Fly protocol has a 19% false-negative rate, meaning nearly 1 in 5 children who "pass" are actually responding to monocular cues rather than true stereoscopic vision 2. This occurs because:
- Monocular clues are present in the Titmus Fly, Animals, and first four Circles tests that allow patients to fake responses 3
- Children can learn the expected response pattern without using stereopsis 2
Modified Protocol to Improve Accuracy
If using the Titmus Fly, you must employ a two-step verification protocol 2:
- Administer the test per standard instructions
- For any "pass" result, immediately re-test with polarizers of matching orientation for both eyes (eliminating disparity cues)
- If the child still pinches above the plate without disparity cues, the initial "pass" was a false positive
This modified protocol increases sensitivity from 81% to 90% 2.
When to Choose Alternative Tests Instead
Prefer other stereopsis tests over Titmus Fly in these scenarios:
For Quantifying Stereoacuity
- Use Randot Preschool or Randot tests for measuring actual stereoacuity thresholds, as they yield better performance in children and have fewer monocular cues 4
- The Randot test demonstrates superior performance across all pediatric age groups compared to Titmus 4
For Confirming True Stereopsis
- Use Frisby test when you need definitive confirmation that stereopsis is present, as it produces zero false-positives (unlike Titmus Fly's 6% false-positive rate) 3
- The Frisby test is particularly valuable for rapid assessment of true stereopsis presence/absence 3
For Screening Amblyopia or Strabismus
- Do not use Titmus Fly (or any stereopsis test alone) for screening amblyopia or strabismus, as sensitivity ranges only 17-47% across all stereo tests, with the majority of amblyopic patients (23 of 25) missed by all tests 5
- Titmus shows higher sensitivity for strabismus than amblyopia, but remains inadequate as a standalone screening tool 5
For Patients with Strabismus
- Avoid Titmus tests entirely in patients with >4 prism diopters of horizontal deviation, as true stereopsis is rare beyond this threshold 3
- The Titmus Circles test has a particularly high 35% false-positive rate in strabismic patients 3
Age-Specific Considerations
- Children under 7 years: Fine stereopsis continues maturing through school-age years, so expect variable performance on fine disparity testing 1
- Children 4-7 years: Coarse stereopsis is mature, making the Titmus Fly age-appropriate for gross screening only 1
- Performance variability decreases with age, with normal adult findings achieved by age 7 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never rely on Titmus Fly alone without the modified verification protocol 2
- Do not use Titmus for fine stereoacuity measurement (use Randot instead) 4
- Do not assume a "pass" confirms true stereopsis without eliminating monocular cues 2, 3
- Recognize that any positive Titmus result in patients with >10 PD deviation is likely false 3