What reperfusion method is preferred for a STEMI (ST‑segment‑elevation myocardial infarction) equivalent, and what are the clinical implications of the new occlusive myocardial infarction (occlusive MI) versus non‑occlusive myocardial infarction (non‑occlusive MI) paradigm?

Reperfusion Strategy for STEMI Equivalents

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the definitive reperfusion method for STEMI equivalents and should be performed within 90 minutes of first medical contact at PCI-capable facilities, or within 120 minutes when transfer is required. 1

Defining STEMI Equivalents

STEMI equivalents are ECG patterns that indicate acute coronary occlusion despite the absence of classic ST-elevation:

• New or presumed new left bundle branch block 2
• Isolated ST-depression in anterior leads (V1-V4) with ST-elevation in aVR, suggesting left main or proximal LAD occlusion 2, 3
• Hyperacute T-waves preceding ST-elevation 2, 3
• Posterior MI (ST-depression V1-V3 with tall R-waves) 3, 4

These patterns mandate the same urgent reperfusion approach as classic STEMI because they represent complete coronary occlusion with equivalent mortality risk. 2, 3

Algorithmic Approach to Reperfusion

Step 1: Immediate Actions (Within 10 Minutes)

• Obtain and interpret 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes of first medical contact to identify STEMI equivalents 1, 2
• Administer aspirin 150-325 mg orally (or 250-500 mg IV if unable to swallow) immediately 1, 2
• Activate the catheterization laboratory without delay 1, 2
• Avoid routine supplemental oxygen unless oxygen saturation <90% 2

Step 2: Select Reperfusion Strategy Based on Time

If at PCI-capable hospital:

• Perform primary PCI within 90 minutes of first medical contact 1
• Transfer patient directly to catheterization laboratory, bypassing the emergency department 1, 2

If at non-PCI-capable hospital:

• Transfer immediately for primary PCI if first-medical-contact-to-device time ≤120 minutes 1
• Door-in-door-out time should be ≤30 minutes 1
• Administer fibrinolytic therapy within 10-30 minutes if anticipated PCI time >120 minutes 1

Step 3: Mandatory PCI Regardless of Time Delay

Primary PCI is required irrespective of any time delay in these scenarios:

• Cardiogenic shock or acute severe heart failure 1, 2
• Contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy (active bleeding, recent stroke, terminal illness) 1
• Failed fibrinolysis (persistent symptoms, <50% ST-segment resolution at 60-90 minutes) 1, 2

Antithrombotic Regimen for Primary PCI

• Administer potent P2Y12 inhibitor before or at time of PCI: prasugrel 60 mg loading dose OR ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose (clopidogrel only if these unavailable) 1, 2, 4
• Unfractionated heparin 100 U/kg IV bolus (reduce to 60 U/kg if GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors used) 1, 2
• Fondaparinux is contraindicated for primary PCI 2
• Use radial arterial access as the default approach 2
• Implant drug-eluting stents as standard practice 2

Fibrinolytic Strategy (When PCI Delay >120 Minutes)

• Administer fibrin-specific agent (tenecteplase, alteplase, or reteplase) within 10-30 minutes of diagnosis 1, 2
• Combine with aspirin and clopidogrel (prasugrel/ticagrelor are contraindicated with fibrinolysis) 2
• Use enoxaparin as preferred anticoagulant (or unfractionated heparin if unavailable) 2
• Transfer for angiography 3-24 hours after fibrinolysis in stable patients 1, 2
• Immediate rescue PCI for failed reperfusion (<50% ST-resolution, hemodynamic instability, or refractory ischemia) 1, 2

---

Clinical Consequences of the Occlusive MI vs. Non-Occlusive MI Paradigm

The new OMI/NOMI paradigm reveals that 40% of patients with acute coronary occlusion present without ST-elevation (STEMI-negative OMI), yet these patients experience similar mortality and infarct size to STEMI-positive OMI but suffer dangerous delays to catheterization—median 437 minutes versus 41 minutes. 5

The Fundamental Problem with STEMI/NSTEMI Classification

The traditional STEMI/NSTEMI paradigm misclassifies a substantial proportion of patients with complete coronary occlusion as "NSTEMI" because their ECG does not meet strict ST-elevation criteria, despite having:

• Acute total coronary occlusion on angiography (TIMI 0-2 flow) 5
• Peak troponin T levels comparable to STEMI (median 1.87 ng/mL for STEMI-negative OMI vs. 3.78 ng/mL for STEMI-positive OMI) 5
• Similar adverse outcomes to STEMI-positive patients 5

Mortality and Morbidity Impact

STEMI-negative OMI patients face a critical treatment gap:

• Only 28% undergo catheterization within 90 minutes, compared to 76% of STEMI-positive OMI patients 5
• Median time to catheterization is 437 minutes (7.3 hours) versus 41 minutes for STEMI-positive OMI 5
• Increased mortality compared to true non-occlusive MI due to delayed reperfusion 5
• Larger final infarct size from prolonged ischemia despite eventual intervention 5

Quality of Life Consequences

The delayed recognition and treatment of STEMI-negative OMI results in:

• Greater myocardial damage from hours of untreated occlusion, leading to reduced left ventricular function 5
• Higher rates of heart failure and need for long-term medical therapy 5
• Increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias from larger scar burden 5
• Reduced exercise capacity and functional status compared to promptly treated occlusive MI 5

Practical Implementation of OMI/NOMI Paradigm

The OMI/NOMI paradigm requires emergency physicians and cardiologists to recognize occlusive MI patterns beyond classic STEMI criteria:

ECG Patterns Indicating OMI (Requiring Emergent Catheterization)

• Hyperacute T-waves with or without ST-elevation 2, 3
• Multilead ST-depression with ST-elevation in aVR (left main or proximal LAD occlusion) 2, 3
• Posterior MI pattern (ST-depression V1-V3 with tall R-waves) 3, 4
• New left bundle branch block with concordant ST-changes 2, 3
• Subtle ST-elevation <1 mm in high-risk distributions (e.g., aVL with reciprocal inferior depression) 2, 3

Clinical Integration

• Activate the catheterization laboratory for suspected OMI based on ECG pattern plus clinical context, not strict STEMI criteria alone 2, 3
• Serial ECGs every 15-30 minutes in patients with ongoing symptoms but non-diagnostic initial ECG 2
• Immediate cardiology consultation for borderline cases rather than waiting for troponin results 2, 3
• Urgent angiography within 2 hours for high-risk NSTEMI patterns that may represent OMI 3

System-Level Changes Required

Regional STEMI systems must evolve to OMI systems:

• Expand catheterization laboratory activation criteria beyond strict STEMI definitions to include OMI patterns 2, 5
• Train EMS and emergency physicians to recognize subtle occlusive MI patterns 2, 5
• Implement quality metrics tracking time-to-catheterization for all occlusive MI, not just STEMI 5
• Audit cases of delayed recognition where STEMI-negative OMI was initially triaged as low-risk NSTEMI 5

Critical Pitfall to Avoid

Do not delay emergent catheterization in patients with ongoing ischemic symptoms and subtle ECG changes simply because they do not meet strict STEMI criteria—these patients may have complete coronary occlusion (OMI) and require the same urgent reperfusion as classic STEMI to prevent mortality and preserve myocardial function. 5