What is the recommended follow‑up and management for a radial scar identified on breast imaging or core‑needle biopsy, including recommendations when the core biopsy shows no atypia versus when atypia or carcinoma is present?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 12, 2026 • View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Radial Scars on Breast Imaging and Core Needle Biopsy

Primary Recommendation

Radial scars identified on core needle biopsy should undergo surgical excision when atypia or carcinoma is present on the biopsy specimen, while radial scars without atypia may be managed with close imaging surveillance in carefully selected patients. 1, 2

Management Algorithm Based on Core Biopsy Results

Radial Scar WITH Atypia or Carcinoma

Surgical excision is mandatory when core needle biopsy reveals:

  • Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) 1, 2
  • Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) 1
  • Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) 1
  • Any carcinoma (invasive or in situ) 1, 2

Rationale: The upgrade rate to malignancy in radial scars with atypia is approximately 17-33%, representing significant underestimation risk. 3, 4 The NCCN explicitly recommends excisional biopsy for radial scars with concurrent atypical hyperplasia or high-risk lesions. 1, 2

Radial Scar WITHOUT Atypia

This scenario requires careful assessment of imaging-pathology concordance and patient-specific factors:

Option 1: Surgical Excision (Traditional Approach)

Excision remains appropriate and is supported by NCCN guidelines, particularly when: 1, 2

  • Imaging-pathology discordance exists 2
  • Lesion size is large (>1.5 cm) 5, 6
  • Patient has high breast cancer risk (strong family history, genetic predisposition) 2
  • Patient anxiety cannot be managed with reassurance 2
  • Lesion was sampled with standard core needle (not vacuum-assisted/mammotome) 7

Supporting evidence: Historical studies show 9-25% of radial scars harbor occult malignancy at excision, even without atypia on core biopsy. 5, 6 One screening program study found 24.8% had final malignant diagnosis. 6

Option 2: Imaging Surveillance (Emerging Approach)

Close imaging follow-up may substitute for excision in highly selected patients when ALL of the following criteria are met: 1, 2

Mandatory criteria:

  • Complete imaging-pathology concordance 2
  • No atypia on core biopsy 7, 3, 4
  • Adequate sampling with vacuum-assisted biopsy (mammotome) 7
  • Patient able to comply with rigorous follow-up 2
  • Low-to-average breast cancer risk profile 2

Surveillance protocol: 2

  • Physical examination and imaging (mammography/ultrasound) every 6-12 months for 1-2 years
  • Return to routine screening if stable throughout surveillance period
  • Any interval change mandates immediate tissue sampling

Supporting evidence: Recent studies show 0% upgrade rate to invasive carcinoma or DCIS in radial scars without atypia when adequate vacuum-assisted sampling was performed. 7, 4 One study with 18-month median follow-up showed stability in all 13 patients managed conservatively. 4

Critical Nuances and Pitfalls

Upgrade Risk Stratification

  • Radial scar with atypia on CNB: 17-33% upgrade rate to malignancy 3, 4
  • Radial scar without atypia on CNB: 0-22.5% upgrade rate, with most upgrades being additional atypia rather than carcinoma 7, 3, 4
  • Standard core biopsy: Higher miss rate compared to vacuum-assisted biopsy 7

Long-Term Cancer Risk

Even when excision shows benign findings, patients with radial scars have 7.5% risk of developing breast cancer during 10-year follow-up, suggesting these patients may benefit from enhanced surveillance. 3

Imaging-Pathology Concordance is Non-Negotiable

Any discordance between the radiologic appearance and pathology findings mandates surgical excision, as this represents potential sampling error. 2 The NCCN emphasizes that discordance requires repeat imaging and/or additional tissue sampling, with surgical excision mandatory in cases of persistent discordance. 2

Biopsy Technique Matters

Vacuum-assisted (mammotome) biopsies provide larger tissue samples and appear to have superior accuracy, with some studies showing 0% upgrade rate when this technique is used. 7 Standard core needle biopsies have higher rates of underestimation. 7

Practical Clinical Decision Framework

Step 1: Review core biopsy pathology

  • Atypia or carcinoma present? → Surgical excision mandatory 1, 2
  • Pure radial scar only? → Proceed to Step 2

Step 2: Assess imaging-pathology concordance

  • Discordant? → Surgical excision mandatory 2
  • Concordant? → Proceed to Step 3

Step 3: Evaluate biopsy technique and adequacy

  • Standard core needle biopsy? → Favor surgical excision 7
  • Vacuum-assisted biopsy with adequate sampling? → Proceed to Step 4

Step 4: Assess patient-specific factors

  • High-risk patient, large lesion (>1.5 cm), or patient anxiety? → Surgical excision 2, 5
  • Low-risk patient, small lesion, able to comply with surveillance? → Imaging surveillance acceptable 2, 7, 4

When Surveillance is Chosen

Patients must understand: 2, 3

  • Mandatory adherence to 6-12 month imaging intervals for 1-2 years
  • Any change in clinical examination or imaging requires immediate biopsy
  • Increased long-term breast cancer risk (7.5% at 10 years) warrants continued vigilance
  • Option for delayed excision remains available if anxiety develops

References

1
Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

2
Guideline

Management of Radial Scars on Breast Biopsy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

5
Research

The radial scar of the breast diagnosed at core needle biopsy.

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2012

Related Questions

What is the diagnosis and treatment for radial scar (RS) of the breast?
Why is a surgical consult recommended for an adult female with a radial scar on a breast biopsy, possibly with a family history of breast cancer or other risk factors?
What is an excisional biopsy (EXCISIONAL BIOPSY)?
What is the management approach for a patient with a radial scar in the breast, particularly in terms of diagnostic workup and potential treatment options?
What is the recommended treatment for a patient with a radial sclerosing lesion and ductal epithelial hyperplasia diagnosed on a left breast biopsy?
What are the recommended evaluations and management strategies for bilateral foot edema in a 22‑year‑old African‑American male paraplegic (T12 spinal injury) with stage IV pressure ulcer, neurogenic bladder, severe hydronephrosis, protein‑calorie malnutrition, iron‑deficiency anemia, and ongoing nicotine and cannabis use?
What are the differences between folate (vitamin B9) and ferritin regarding the nutrients they assess, the type of anemia they cause, and the appropriate supplementation treatment?
In a 20-year-old pregnant woman in her first trimester who is a heavy smoker and has unsuccessfully attempted cessation, what is the most appropriate next step in management?
Is a white blood cell count of 3.8 × 10⁹/L concerning in an otherwise healthy 18‑year‑old female?
How should I evaluate and manage postoperative urinary retention in an older male patient who cannot void 6–8 hours after surgery, especially after spinal/epidural anesthesia, opioid and anticholinergic use, and with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia?
How should I evaluate and manage an adult with sore throat, including indications for rapid streptococcal testing, appropriate antibiotic therapy (penicillin V, amoxicillin, cephalexin, azithromycin) for patients with and without penicillin allergy, and symptomatic treatment?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Ask Question