Palivizumab Prophylaxis for RSV Prevention
This 2-month-old former 29-week preterm infant qualifies for palivizumab prophylaxis and should receive it—the answer is B. 1, 2
Why Palivizumab Is Indicated
Infants born before 29 weeks, 0 days' gestation who are younger than 12 months at the start of RSV season are eligible for palivizumab prophylaxis based on gestational age alone, regardless of current health status. 1, 2 This infant, born at 29 weeks and now 2 months old (corrected age approximately term), falls squarely within this high-risk category. 1
- The American Academy of Pediatrics specifically recommends palivizumab for all infants born at ≤28 weeks gestation during their first RSV season, whenever that occurs during the first 12 months of life. 2, 3
- Even though this infant is now healthy with a normal examination and off oxygen, the prematurity itself (29 weeks) confers sufficient risk to warrant prophylaxis. 1, 2
Clinical Benefit and Limitations
Palivizumab reduces RSV-related hospitalization risk by approximately 45-55% in high-risk infants, though it does not affect mortality and has minimal impact on subsequent wheezing. 1, 2 The benefit is specifically in preventing hospital admission for severe RSV disease. 1
- Palivizumab is only for prevention, never for treatment of established RSV infection. 4, 5
- The mother's concern about "bronchitis" (likely referring to RSV bronchiolitis) is precisely what palivizumab is designed to prevent. 1, 2
Administration Protocol
The recommended regimen is 15 mg/kg intramuscularly monthly throughout RSV season, with a maximum of 5 doses. 1, 2, 5
- The first dose should be given 48-72 hours before hospital discharge or promptly after discharge if the infant qualifies during RSV season. 1, 2
- Since this infant is presenting for a vaccination appointment (presumably already discharged from NICU), the first dose should be administered immediately. 1, 2
- Doses continue monthly (every 28-30 days) throughout the RSV season (typically November through March, though this varies by region). 2, 5
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
Reassurance alone (Option A) is inadequate and represents a missed opportunity to reduce severe RSV disease risk in a clearly eligible high-risk infant. 1 The American Academy of Pediatrics explicitly states that providing only reassurance when an infant meets eligibility criteria forgoes proven preventive benefit. 1
- Antibiotics (Option C) have no role in RSV prevention and should only be used when specific bacterial co-infection is documented. 4, 6
- Cough as a route of transmission (Option D) is not a preventive intervention—RSV spreads via respiratory droplets and contact with contaminated surfaces, but this knowledge doesn't constitute a prevention strategy. 6, 3
Essential Adjunctive Prevention Measures
Beyond palivizumab, counsel the mother on critical non-pharmacologic measures: 1, 2
- Complete elimination of tobacco smoke exposure is essential and increases RSV hospitalization risk. 1, 2
- Avoid crowds and situations where exposure to infected people cannot be controlled, especially during RSV season. 1, 2
- Restrict group childcare participation during RSV season when feasible. 1, 2
- Practice strict hand hygiene by all caregivers and family members. 1, 2
- Ensure influenza vaccination for all household contacts (infant can receive at 6 months). 1, 2
- Continue breastfeeding to potentially decrease lower respiratory tract disease risk. 2, 4
Common Pitfall
The most critical error would be withholding palivizumab because the infant appears healthy now. 1 The eligibility is based on gestational age at birth and chronologic age at RSV season onset, not current clinical status. 1, 2 Former preterm infants remain at elevated risk for severe RSV disease throughout their first year despite appearing well. 6, 3