Which SBAR component (Situation, Background, Assessment, or Recommendation) is being used when the nurse reports a 31‑year‑old primigravida in the ICU after emergency cesarean section for uterine rupture who now has shortness of breath, tachycardia, and tachypnea?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SBAR Component: Recommendation

The nurse is using the "Recommendation" component of SBAR by explicitly telling the resident "he should come to evaluate the patient." 1, 2, 3

Understanding SBAR Framework in This Clinical Scenario

The SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation) communication tool structures critical clinical information systematically:

Breaking Down This Communication

Situation component would include:

  • Patient in bed 3 ICU
  • Currently complaining of shortness of breath 1, 2

Background component would include:

  • 31-year-old female primigravida
  • Post-emergency cesarean section for uterine rupture 4

Assessment component would include:

  • Tachycardia and tachypnea (objective clinical findings) 1, 2, 3

Recommendation component is clearly stated:

  • "He should come to evaluate the patient" - this is the explicit action request 1, 2, 3

Why This Matters Clinically

This post-uterine rupture patient presenting with respiratory distress requires urgent evaluation for:

  • Pulmonary embolism (high-risk postpartum complication) 4
  • Hemorrhagic shock with compensatory tachycardia (uterine rupture can cause massive blood loss requiring aggressive crystalloid resuscitation and massive transfusion protocol) 3
  • Disseminated intravascular coagulation (reported complication of uterine rupture) 5
  • Unrecognized ongoing bleeding requiring reoperation 3

The recommendation for immediate physician evaluation is appropriate given that uterine rupture survivors require vigilant monitoring for renal failure, liver failure, infection, unrecognized ureteral/bladder/bowel injury, pulmonary edema, and disseminated intravascular coagulation 3.

Common Pitfall

The key distinguishing feature is the directive action statement ("should come to evaluate"), which transforms this from merely presenting information into making a specific recommendation for physician response 1, 2, 3.

References

Guideline

Risk Assessment and Management of C-Scar Rupture

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Uterine Rupture During VBAC: Recognition and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Suspected Cesarean Scar Rupture

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Rupture of the uterus with DIC.

Annals of emergency medicine, 1983

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.