Which contraceptive method provides the greatest protection against ectopic pregnancy: intrauterine device (IUD) or combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Best Contraceptive to Prevent Ectopic Pregnancy

Both IUDs and OCPs significantly reduce the absolute risk of ectopic pregnancy compared to no contraception, but IUDs—particularly the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD—provide superior protection against ectopic pregnancy compared to oral contraceptive pills.

Absolute Risk Reduction: Both Methods Protective

  • All effective contraceptives reduce ectopic pregnancy risk by preventing pregnancy altogether; the absolute risk of ectopic pregnancy is lower in women using any contraception compared to those using none 1, 2.

  • IUDs are among the most effective contraceptives available, with failure rates less than 1% per year, meaning fewer total pregnancies and therefore fewer opportunities for ectopic pregnancy 3, 4.

  • OCPs have higher typical-use failure rates (approximately 7-9% per year with typical use) compared to IUDs, resulting in more total pregnancies and thus more potential ectopic pregnancies in absolute terms 3.

Comparative Effectiveness: IUD Superior

Levonorgestrel-Releasing IUD (LNG-IUD)

  • The LNG-IUD provides the strongest protection against ectopic pregnancy with an ectopic pregnancy rate of only 0.02 per 100 woman-years 5.

  • In a large prospective European study of 58,324 women, the LNG-IUD demonstrated an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.26 (95% CI: 0.10-0.66) for ectopic pregnancy compared to copper IUDs, meaning a 74% lower risk 6.

  • The overall Pearl pregnancy index for LNG-IUD is 0.06 (95% CI: 0.04-0.09), making it one of the most effective contraceptives available 6.

Copper IUD

  • Copper IUDs also provide excellent protection with approximately 6 pregnancies per 1000 woman-years, and ectopic pregnancies are rarer in copper IUD users than in women using no contraception 1.

  • The ectopic pregnancy incidence with copper IUDs ranges from 0-2.9 per 1000 woman-years in marketed devices 7.

  • Among pregnancies that do occur with copper IUDs in place, approximately 1 in 20 (5%) is ectopic, but the absolute risk remains very low due to the high overall effectiveness 1.

Oral Contraceptive Pills

  • OCPs reduce ectopic pregnancy risk primarily by preventing ovulation, but their effectiveness depends heavily on consistent, correct use 3.

  • No specific data on ectopic pregnancy rates with OCPs were provided in the guidelines, but their higher typical-use failure rate (compared to IUDs) translates to more total pregnancies and therefore more ectopic pregnancies in absolute numbers 3.

Clinical Recommendation Algorithm

For women specifically concerned about ectopic pregnancy prevention:

  1. First-line choice: Levonorgestrel-releasing IUD - provides the lowest absolute risk of ectopic pregnancy (0.02 per 100 woman-years) 5, 6

  2. Second-line choice: Copper IUD - also highly protective with ectopic pregnancy rates of 0-2.9 per 1000 woman-years 7

  3. Third-line choice: OCPs - protective compared to no contraception, but less effective than IUDs due to higher typical-use failure rates 3

Important Clinical Caveats

  • Past ectopic pregnancy is NOT a contraindication to IUD use (Category 1 for both copper and LNG-IUD), and women with this history can safely use IUDs 3, 1.

  • The comment that "when pregnancy occurs with an IUD, the relative likelihood of ectopic pregnancy increases" refers only to the proportion among the rare pregnancies that do occur—not the absolute risk, which remains very low 3.

  • IUDs do not cause ectopic pregnancy; they prevent all pregnancies, including ectopic ones, more effectively than most other methods 1, 2.

  • Progestin-only injectables and implants also provide excellent protection against ectopic pregnancy with incidence rates of 0-2.9 per 1000 woman-years, comparable to IUDs 7.

Related Questions

What birth control options are available for a woman of reproductive age with a history of leg abscess, who wants to stop her periods?
What could explain the lack of weight loss in a 36‑year‑old woman who does high‑intensity exercise three times weekly, uses a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD) and takes escitalopram 5 mg daily?
What are the management recommendations for a patient with a history of ectopic pregnancy after IUD (intrauterine device) insertion?
Are intrauterine devices (IUDs) and subdermal birth controls, such as Nexplanon (etonogestrel), combined contraceptives or progesterone-only?
Can an intrauterine device (IUD) and/or oral contraceptive pills be used to reset the uterine lining?
Does remaining inactive after a confirmed miscarriage prevent the expulsion of retained products of conception?
For a patient with normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism, normal renal function, mild osteopenia, remote history of nephrolithiasis, and normal vitamin D levels, is observation rather than immediate parathyroidectomy appropriate?
In a stable patient who recently had an acute ST‑segment‑elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), what is the evidence‑based long‑term secondary‑prevention medication regimen?
In an elderly patient with fresh rectal bleeding, known hypertension and colorectal polyp, presenting with tachycardia, pallor, blood pressure 160/96, and no hemoglobin result, what is the most appropriate initial management?
What is the appropriate diagnostic workup for edema?
Three weeks after a spontaneous miscarriage, my serum beta‑human chorionic gonadotropin is 6 IU/L, endometrial thickness is about 8 mm, and I have mild persistent spotting; what is the appropriate next step in management?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.