What are the most common microorganisms causing febrile neutropenia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Most Common Microorganisms Causing Febrile Neutropenia

Gram-positive bacteria now account for 60-70% of microbiologically documented infections in febrile neutropenia, representing a shift from historical patterns, though gram-negative bacteria remain critically important due to their association with fulminant infections and high mortality. 1

Gram-Positive Pathogens (Most Common Overall)

The gram-positive organisms dominating current febrile neutropenia cases include:

  • Coagulase-negative staphylococci are the most frequently isolated gram-positive pathogen, though these typically cause more indolent infections 1
  • Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant strains) causes potentially fulminant infections requiring prompt treatment 1
  • Viridans group streptococci can cause severe, life-threatening infections particularly in patients with chemotherapy-induced mucositis 1
  • Enterococcus species (including vancomycin-resistant strains) account for >50% of resistant isolates in some centers 1
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes are less common but clinically significant 1

Critical Clinical Distinction

While gram-positive bacteria are numerically more common, many cause indolent infections (coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Corynebacterium jeikeium) where a few days' delay in specific therapy may not be detrimental, though hospitalization may be prolonged. 1 However, S. aureus, viridans streptococci, and pneumococci can cause fulminant infections resulting in serious complications or death if not treated promptly. 1

Gram-Negative Pathogens (Highest Mortality Risk)

Despite being less common overall, gram-negative bacteria remain prominent causes requiring immediate empirical coverage:

  • Escherichia coli is the most common gram-negative isolate and remains a prominent cause of bloodstream infection 1, 2
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa is particularly concerning due to high associated mortality and must be covered empirically 1, 2
  • Klebsiella species are frequent pathogens, with increasing carbapenemase-producing strains reported 1
  • Enterobacter species, Acinetobacter species, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Citrobacter species are also documented causes 1

The rate of gram-negative infections is increasing in some centers, reversing the previous trend toward gram-positive predominance. 1

Fungal Pathogens (Late-Onset)

Fungi are rarely the cause of initial fever but emerge as important pathogens with specific timing:

  • Candida species (primarily yeasts) typically appear after the first week of prolonged neutropenia and empirical antibiotic therapy, entering through chemotherapy-induced mucositis 1, 2
  • Aspergillus species and other molds cause life-threatening infections of sinuses and lungs, typically after >2 weeks of neutropenia 1, 2

Viral Pathogens

  • Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is a common viral pathogen 2
  • Respiratory viruses including RSV, parainfluenza, and influenza A and B can cause neutropenic fever 2

Critical Context for Empirical Management

The majority of patients (50-60%) who develop fever during neutropenia have no identifiable site of infection and no positive culture results, yet empirical antibiotic therapy must be administered urgently (within 2 hours) because infection can progress rapidly. 1, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay empirical antibiotics waiting for culture results—bacterial progression can be fulminant, particularly with gram-negative organisms 1
  • Do not assume gram-positive coverage alone is sufficient despite their numerical predominance—gram-negative bacteria (especially P. aeruginosa) carry higher mortality risk and require immediate coverage 1
  • Consider local antibiograms when selecting empirical regimens, as resistance patterns vary significantly by institution 1
  • Recognize timing patterns: bacterial infections dominate early presentation, while fungal infections emerge after prolonged neutropenia (>7-14 days) 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Neutropenic Fever Causes and Considerations

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

What is the antibiotic of choice for a patient with febrile neutropenia and a subclinical urinary tract infection (UTI)?
What percentage of febrile neutropenia cases are caused by bacteria, fungi, and viruses respectively?
Can vancomycin be stopped in a patient with preliminary blood culture results showing gram-negative anaerobic bacilli?
How should a patient with neutropenia and a suspected infection be managed, differentiating between viral and bacterial causes?
What is the best treatment approach for a neutropenic patient with a groin wound showing signs of infection?
What is the likely diagnosis and recommended management for a newborn with a congenital double‑lobed (elf/Mozart) ear and macrodactyly?
What is the most likely diagnosis in a diabetic, hypertensive female with right‑sided facial weakness causing mouth deviation to the right and tearing of the right eye?
When can nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy be safely stopped in chronic hepatitis B patients (both HBeAg‑positive and HBeAg‑negative) without advanced liver disease?
What functional pelvic‑floor disorder causes sharp left‑sided rectal pain with straining, and how should it be diagnosed and treated?
What is the next best step in managing a 45-year-old woman with a three‑week history of sharp, non‑radiating chest pain occurring at night, lasting 5–10 minutes, not related to exertion, with a normal physical exam, normal sinus ECG, and a history of hypertension and chronic back pain?
Is a plain radiograph (X‑ray) a reliable imaging modality for evaluating herniated intervertebral discs?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.