What is the plan for resection in a patient with colon cancer involving 50% of the wall circumference and multiple linear deep ulcerations on colonoscopy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The recommended approach for a colon cancer patient with 50% circumferential wall involvement and multiple linear deep ulcerations on colonoscopy is option D: Resection of both primary tumor and secondary lesions. This comprehensive surgical approach is necessary because the presence of deep ulcerations suggests an aggressive tumor that may have already spread beyond the primary site. The surgical plan should include a formal oncologic resection of the primary tumor with adequate margins (typically 5-10 cm), along with removal of the regional lymph node basin and any visible secondary lesions. This approach allows for both therapeutic intervention and proper pathological staging. The extent of resection would typically involve removing the affected segment of colon along with its mesentery containing the lymphatic drainage. Following surgery, the patient should receive appropriate adjuvant therapy based on the final pathological staging. This aggressive approach is justified because partial circumferential involvement with ulcerations indicates a locally advanced tumor that requires definitive treatment to achieve the best oncological outcome and prevent complications such as obstruction, perforation, or bleeding. According to the guidelines from the World Journal of Emergency Surgery 1, the surgical options for complicated colorectal cancer depend primarily on the location of the tumor, comorbidities of the patient, and degree of their clinical status derangement at presentation. For left-sided lesions, Hartmann’s procedure should be considered the procedure of choice, especially in unstable patients 1. However, in the context of a patient with 50% circumferential wall involvement and multiple linear deep ulcerations, a more comprehensive approach is necessary to ensure optimal oncological outcomes. The guidelines from the Annals of Oncology 1 support the use of a wide resection of the involved segment of bowel, along with the removal of its lymphatic drainage, to achieve the best oncological outcome. Therefore, option D: Resection of both primary tumor and secondary lesions is the most appropriate approach for this patient, as it allows for both therapeutic intervention and proper pathological staging, and is supported by the most recent and highest quality evidence 1.

From the Research

Plan for Resection

The plan for resection in a cancer colon patient with 50% of wall circumference involvement and multiple linear deep ulcerations, as shown by colonoscopy, can be considered based on the following points:

  • The primary treatment approach for such cases often involves resection of the primary tumor, potentially followed by treatment of any metastases found 2.
  • Studies have shown that primary tumor resection (PTR) can be associated with longer survival in patients with metastatic colon cancer and unresectable synchronous metastases 2.
  • The decision for resection and the approach used can depend on various factors including the tumor's location, size, and the patient's overall health condition 3, 4.
  • Different anastomosis methods, such as overlap anastomosis and functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA), have been compared in terms of clinical efficacy in laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer, with overlap anastomosis showing potential benefits in terms of operation time and recovery 5.

Considerations for Resection

Key considerations for the plan of resection include:

  • The extent of tumor involvement and the presence of any metastases 6, 2.
  • The patient's suitability for surgery, including their overall health and any comorbidities 3.
  • The potential risks and benefits of different surgical approaches, including the risk of anastomotic leakage and other complications 4, 5.
  • The potential for adjuvant therapies, such as chemotherapy or targeted therapy, which may be considered based on the tumor's molecular characteristics and the patient's overall condition 6.

Options for Resection

Given the information provided, the options for resection can be considered as follows:

  • Resection of the primary tumor, potentially followed by treatment of any metastases found (Option A or D) 2.
  • The choice between these options would depend on the specific details of the patient's case, including the extent of tumor involvement, the presence of any metastases, and the patient's overall health condition.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Is primary tumor resection associated with a longer survival in colon cancer and unresectable synchronous metastases? A 4-year multicentre experience.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2014

Research

Anastomotic Location Predicts Anastomotic Leakage After Elective Colonic Resection for Cancer.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.