Should point‑of‑care ultrasound be performed at every prenatal visit in a low‑risk pregnancy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 16, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Should Bedside Ultrasound Be Done Every Visit for Pregnancy?

No, bedside ultrasound should not be performed at every prenatal visit for low-risk pregnancies, as there is no convincing evidence that routine antenatal testing improves perinatal outcomes, and false-positive results may lead to unnecessary interventions that increase the risk for Cesarean delivery or complications related to premature delivery. 1

Evidence Against Routine Ultrasound at Every Visit

The American College of Radiology explicitly states that routine antenatal fetal surveillance by any imaging modality is not recommended in pregnancies at low risk for intrauterine fetal demise. 1 This recommendation is based on:

  • No demonstrated benefit: A review of five trials involving 14,185 women concluded that umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in low-risk or unselected populations had no maternal or perinatal benefits. 1

  • Potential for harm: False-positive results in low-risk pregnancies may lead to unnecessary interventions, including increased Cesarean delivery rates and complications related to premature delivery. 1

  • Lack of improved outcomes: There is no convincing evidence that routine antenatal testing in low-risk pregnancies improves perinatal outcome, regardless of the imaging modality used (biophysical profile, modified biophysical profile, Doppler velocimetry, or functional fetal echocardiography). 1

Recommended Ultrasound Schedule for Low-Risk Pregnancy

Instead of ultrasound at every visit, the evidence supports a more targeted approach:

  • One routine ultrasound: The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development multi-specialty panel recommends that at least one ultrasound be offered routinely to all pregnant women between 18 and 20 weeks of gestation. 1

  • Standard anatomic survey: This single comprehensive ultrasound at 18-20 weeks allows for thorough evaluation of fetal anatomy and has been agreed upon by multiple organizations (ACR-ACOG-AIUM-SMFM-SRU). 1

  • No routine third-trimester screening: Multiple international guidelines (United Kingdom, New Zealand, Canada, Ireland, United States) do not recommend screening with routine third-trimester ultrasound in low-risk women. 1

When Additional Ultrasounds Are Indicated

Additional ultrasounds beyond the standard 18-20 week scan should be reserved for specific clinical indications:

  • Fundal height discrepancies: Serial fundal height measurement at every visit should prompt ultrasound if measurements are <10th centile, show slow or static growth, or have >3 cm discrepancy with gestational age. 1

  • High-risk conditions: Pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders, diabetes, chronic renal disease, intrauterine growth restriction, decreased fetal movement, multiple gestations, or amniotic fluid abnormalities warrant serial ultrasound surveillance. 2, 3

  • Late presentation: A routine diagnostic ultrasound may be used in the third trimester for patients with late arrival for prenatal care. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Over-testing low-risk patients: Routine testing in low-risk pregnancies causes iatrogenic prematurity from false-positive results without improving outcomes. 2, 3

  • Ignoring clinical indicators: While routine ultrasound at every visit is not indicated, clinicians should maintain vigilance for clinical signs (abnormal fundal height, decreased fetal movement, maternal symptoms) that warrant targeted ultrasound evaluation. 1

  • Confusing point-of-care capability with indication: Although point-of-care ultrasound technology is increasingly available and can be valuable for specific maternal assessments (cardiopulmonary status, emergency situations), this does not justify routine fetal surveillance at every visit in low-risk pregnancies. 4, 5, 6

Risk Stratification Approach

The key is distinguishing between low-risk and high-risk pregnancies:

  • Low-risk pregnancies: One comprehensive ultrasound at 18-20 weeks, with additional imaging only for specific clinical indications. 1

  • High-risk pregnancies: Serial ultrasound surveillance initiated at 32-34 weeks (or earlier depending on the condition), typically every 2-4 weeks, with additional Doppler studies if growth restriction is suspected. 2, 3

This evidence-based approach maximizes benefit while minimizing unnecessary interventions and healthcare costs. 1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Fetal Well-being Assessment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Balancing Psychological Impact with Clinical Benefits of Antepartum Testing

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Point-of-care ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021

Research

Point of care maternal ultrasound in obstetrics.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023

Research

Point-of-care ultrasound in obstetrics.

Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2019

Related Questions

Are weekly ultrasound scans safe and recommended during the first trimester?
What is the recommended guideline for congenital anomaly scanning in a pregnant individual?
Does a prenatal ultrasound need to be repeated if the first scan occurs before 10 weeks of gestation?
What are the ultrasound scan guidelines for a pregnant adult female with an uncomplicated pregnancy throughout the entire gestation period?
At what age of gestation is congenital (fetal anomaly) scanning typically performed?
For an adult with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis, is the triple therapy of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and iguratimod safer and more effective than methotrexate, leflunomide, and iguratimod?
Should ionized hypocalcemia be corrected when the total serum calcium concentration is elevated?
What are the non‑pancreatic causes of an elevated serum lipase level?
For a COVID‑19 return‑to‑work visit (single resolved viral illness) with 2 min HPI, 5 min exam, 3 min assessment, 2 min documentation (total 12 min), what CPT code is appropriate based on time and based on MDM? For a 54‑year‑old female six‑month follow‑up of diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension with labs reviewed and a total visit time of 20 min (moderate‑complexity MDM), what CPT code is appropriate based on time and based on MDM?
Can hydroxychloroquine be added to methotrexate and iguratimod in a newly diagnosed adult with rheumatoid arthritis, and what are the appropriate dose, expected efficacy, and safety considerations?
According to Italian guidelines, how should placental lacunae identified at 37 weeks + 4 days in a 36-year-old woman with an anterior placenta and a history of uterine curettage be managed?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.