Treatment of Iatrogenic Coronary Dissection
Immediate Assessment and Risk Stratification
Management of iatrogenic coronary dissection must be guided by three critical factors: hemodynamic stability, presence of anterograde coronary ischemia, and anatomic extent of dissection—with immediate percutaneous intervention indicated for hemodynamically unstable patients or those with compromised coronary flow. 1
Key Prognostic Factors
The following features predict worse outcomes and mandate aggressive intervention:
- Hemodynamic instability (hypotension, cardiogenic shock) 1
- Anterograde coronary ischemia with compromised TIMI flow 1
- Extensive dissection extending into the aortic root (Dunning classification grade III) 2, 1
- Left main coronary artery involvement 3
Management Algorithm Based on Clinical Presentation
Hemodynamically Unstable Patients or Compromised Coronary Flow
Immediate bail-out stenting to seal the dissection flap and restore coronary perfusion is the primary strategy, as failure of percutaneous intervention is directly associated with mortality. 4, 1
- Deploy stents to cover the entire dissection entry point and seal the intimal flap 4, 1
- Careful wiring of the true lumen is essential to prevent extension 4
- If percutaneous intervention fails or is technically impossible, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) must be performed immediately 1, 5
- A multidisciplinary "shock team" approach coordinating interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery is required 1
Hemodynamically Stable Patients with Preserved Coronary Flow
Conservative medical management is reasonable for distal dissections or when coronary flow remains preserved (TIMI 2-3), particularly if the dissection is small and does not involve the left main. 2, 5
- This approach requires continuous hemodynamic monitoring and readiness for immediate intervention if clinical deterioration occurs 5
- Serial imaging with computed tomography angiography guides ongoing management decisions 4
Aortocoronary Dissection with Aortic Extension
When dissection extends retrograde into the aorta, classification determines management:
- Type 1 (intimal tear) and Type 2 (intramural hematoma): Conservative medical therapy with close surveillance is reasonable if coronary flow is preserved 2
- Type 3 (pseudoaneurysm) and Type 4 (rupture): Require immediate surgical or endovascular repair 2
- If coronary involvement is present, stent implantation sealing the flap may be attempted first 2
Specific Anatomic Considerations
Left Main Dissection
- Incidence is approximately 0.07% of all catheterization procedures, twice as common during PCI versus diagnostic angiography 3
- 82% of patients require revascularization (stenting or CABG), with only 16% managed conservatively 3
- In-hospital outcomes are favorable when recognized promptly and managed appropriately, regardless of revascularization strategy 3
- Five-year MACE rates approach 39% among revascularized patients, emphasizing the need for long-term surveillance 3
CTO Procedures
- A significant proportion of iatrogenic dissections occur during chronic total occlusion (CTO) interventions due to vessel complexity and calcification 1
- Heightened vigilance and lower threshold for intervention are warranted in this setting 1
Medical Management Principles
Hemodynamic Targets
- Target systolic blood pressure 100-120 mmHg to maintain coronary perfusion while minimizing aortic wall stress 6, 7
- Target heart rate ≤60 bpm with intravenous beta-blockers to reduce shear stress 6, 7
- Initiate beta-blockade before vasodilators to prevent reflex tachycardia that can propagate dissection 6, 7
Absolute Contraindications
- Never use intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in the setting of aortic dissection or severe aortic regurgitation, as it augments aortic diastolic pressure and worsens outcomes 6, 8
- Avoid inotropic agents that increase contractile force and aortic wall shear stress 6, 8
Surveillance and Follow-Up
- Obtain computed tomography aortography after stabilization to assess residual aortic dissection extent 4
- For patients with aortic extension, follow-up imaging at 6 months, 12 months, then yearly if stable 8
- MRI is preferred for serial surveillance to avoid radiation and nephrotoxic contrast 8
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not delay intervention in hemodynamically unstable patients or those with compromised coronary flow—mortality risk is time-dependent 1
- Do not attempt conservative management when anterograde ischemia is present, as this predicts poor outcomes 1, 5
- Ensure true lumen wiring during bail-out stenting to prevent dissection extension 4
- Avoid vasodilators without prior beta-blockade, as reflex tachycardia increases aortic wall stress 7, 8
- Recognize that failure of percutaneous intervention mandates immediate surgical consultation—delays in CABG after failed PCI are associated with mortality 1