What is the diagnostic approach for classical (systemic) polyarteritis nodosa?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 17, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnosis of Classical Polyarteritis Nodosa

The diagnosis of classical (systemic) polyarteritis nodosa requires tissue biopsy from the most accessible symptomatic site combined with abdominal vascular imaging to confirm medium-vessel necrotizing vasculitis before initiating treatment. 1

Diagnostic Algorithm

Initial Clinical Assessment

Suspect PAN when patients present with:

  • Constitutional symptoms: Fever and unexplained weight loss 1
  • Cutaneous manifestations: Skin nodules and livedo reticularis 1
  • Abdominal pain suggesting mesenteric ischemia 1
  • Peripheral neuropathy: Mononeuritis multiplex or sensory/motor deficits 2
  • Renal insufficiency from vascular involvement (not glomerulonephritis, which suggests microscopic polyangiitis instead) 1

Essential Diagnostic Testing

1. Tissue Biopsy (Preferred for Definitive Diagnosis)

Tissue confirmation is preferred over imaging alone. 1 The biopsy site should be selected based on clinical involvement:

  • For skin involvement: Obtain a deep-skin biopsy (reaching medium-sized vessels of the dermis) rather than superficial punch biopsy, as deeper tissue sampling is more likely to capture affected medium-sized vessels 2

  • For peripheral neuropathy: Obtain a combined nerve and muscle biopsy over nerve biopsy alone, as this increases diagnostic yield 2. Sample an affected purely sensory nerve (e.g., sural nerve) to avoid motor deficits 2

  • Histologic criteria: Look for mixed-cell inflammatory infiltrates, fibrinoid necrosis, and absence of granulomas (which would suggest granulomatosis with polyangiitis) 1

2. Vascular Imaging (Essential for Systemic Disease)

Abdominal vascular imaging is recommended to establish diagnosis and determine disease extent. 1 Options include:

  • Conventional angiography (current gold standard with better resolution) 2
  • CT angiography or MR angiography (noninvasive alternatives) 2

Angiographic findings: Saccular or fusiform aneurysms and stenotic lesions in mesenteric, hepatic, and renal arteries 1

3. Laboratory Testing

  • ANCA testing: Should be negative (positive ANCA suggests microscopic polyangiitis, not PAN) 3
  • Hepatitis B serology: Essential to identify HBV-associated PAN, which requires different treatment (antiviral therapy rather than immunosuppression alone) 4, 5
  • Hepatitis C testing: Also associated with secondary PAN 3

Diagnostic Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on superficial skin biopsies when PAN is suspected—they miss medium-sized vessels 2
  • Do not perform "blind" biopsies of clinically unaffected tissue 2
  • Do not confuse PAN with microscopic polyangiitis: PAN does not affect the lungs and is ANCA-negative 5
  • Do not miss HBV-associated PAN: This variant requires antiviral therapy, not standard immunosuppression 4, 5

Follow-Up Imaging

For patients with severe PAN and abdominal involvement who achieve clinical remission, follow-up abdominal vascular imaging is conditionally recommended, particularly when baseline imaging shows aneurysmal disease. 2 However, avoid indefinite routine imaging if vascular disease is quiescent. 2

Monitoring Disease Activity

For patients with peripheral motor neuropathy from PAN, use serial neurologic examinations rather than repeated electromyography/nerve conduction studies every 6 months, as repeated EMG is invasive and not warranted in stable patients. 2 Repeat EMG only if new or worsening neurologic symptoms develop. 2

Key Diagnostic Principle

The integration of clinical findings, tissue biopsy showing necrotizing vasculitis of medium-sized vessels, negative ANCA, and angiographic evidence of aneurysms or stenoses establishes the diagnosis. 6, 7 No single test reliably confirms or excludes PAN—diagnosis requires synthesizing multiple data sources. 7

References

Guideline

Polyarteritis Nodosa Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Polyarteritis nodosa-induced pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysmal rupture.

The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2015

Guideline

Polyarteritis Nodosa and Hepatitis B Association

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Polyarteritis nodosa: A contemporary overview.

Autoimmunity reviews, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.