Can spinal anesthesia worsen pre-existing lumbar radiculopathy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 17, 2026 • View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Can Spinal Anesthesia Worsen Pre-existing Lumbar Radiculopathy?

Yes, spinal anesthesia can worsen pre-existing lumbar radiculopathy, particularly in patients with spinal stenosis or symptomatic nerve root compression, and should be used with extreme caution or avoided in these patients.

Risk Magnitude and Clinical Evidence

  • Patients with preexisting spinal stenosis or lumbar radiculopathy have a higher incidence of neurologic complications after epidural or spinal anesthesia compared to patients without these conditions 1
  • The risk of persistent lumbosacral neuropathy after single-injection spinal lidocaine is approximately 1 in 1,300 procedures, which is an order of magnitude higher than the risk with other local anesthetics or general anesthesia 2
  • Two case reports document progression of neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia in patients with preexisting spinal stenosis, with one patient requiring surgical decompression due to severe, disabling pain 3

Mechanism of Worsening

  • Direct neurotoxicity: Lidocaine demonstrates concentration-dependent neurotoxicity at clinically available concentrations, affecting cytoplasmic calcium homeostasis and mitochondrial membrane potential 2
  • Mechanical compression: In patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis, the combination of local anesthetic effects and surgical positioning (especially prolonged lordotic positioning) may compromise an already narrowed spinal canal 3
  • Severe polyradiculopathy risk: Two patients with severe polyradiculopathy following epidural procedures both had severe lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI, suggesting this anatomic substrate significantly increases complication severity 4

Specific High-Risk Scenarios

  • Severe spinal stenosis with neuroclaudication symptoms: Avoidance of spinal anesthesia is strongly suggested for any procedure requiring prolonged lordotic positioning or positions that might compromise the spinal canal 3
  • Recently progressive symptomatic spinal stenosis: The decision to perform neuraxial blockade should be made cautiously until the relative contribution of patient versus surgical factors is better understood 3
  • Lithotomy position with lidocaine: The incidence of transient radicular irritation is significantly higher with 5% lidocaine compared to 0.75% bupivacaine specifically in the lithotomy position 5

FDA-Labeled Adverse Events

  • Persistent neurologic deficits: The FDA label for intrathecal lidocaine warns of "persistent motor, sensory and/or autonomic deficit of some lower spinal segments with slow recovery (several months) or incomplete recovery" following caudal or lumbar epidural block 6
  • Spinal block complications: Unintentional subarachnoid injection can cause "spinal block of varying magnitude (including total spinal block), hypotension secondary to spinal block, loss of bladder and bowel control, and loss of perineal sensation" 6
  • Bupivacaine risks: Similar warnings exist for bupivacaine, including "persistent anesthesia, paresthesia, weakness, paralysis of the lower extremities and loss of sphincter control all of which may have slow, incomplete, or no recovery" 7

Clinical Outcomes from Case Series

  • In a series of 12 patients with neurologic complications following lumbar epidural anesthesia, 11 experienced lumbosacral radiculopathy or polyradiculopathy 4
  • The two patients with severe polyradiculopathy both had severe lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI, with one patient showing no improvement after 4 years and severe motor axonal loss on electrodiagnostic studies 4
  • Most patients (10 of 12) were ambulatory at discharge with good neurologic outcomes, but complications were more severe in the presence of spinal stenosis 4

Risk Mitigation Algorithm

Step 1: Preoperative Assessment

  • Obtain detailed history of radicular symptoms, including pain distribution, numbness, weakness, and neuroclaudication 1, 3
  • Review recent imaging (MRI within 24 months) to assess severity of spinal stenosis and nerve root compression 4
  • Document baseline neurologic examination including motor strength, sensation, and reflexes 4

Step 2: Risk Stratification

  • High risk (avoid spinal anesthesia): Severe symptomatic spinal stenosis with neuroclaudication, recently progressive radiculopathy, or procedures requiring prolonged lordotic positioning 3
  • Moderate risk (consider alternatives): Mild-to-moderate spinal stenosis with intermittent radicular symptoms 1, 4
  • Lower risk (may proceed with caution): Resolved or remote history of radiculopathy without current symptoms or imaging evidence of severe stenosis 4

Step 3: Anesthetic Selection if Proceeding

  • Prefer bupivacaine over lidocaine: Bupivacaine has lower neurotoxicity risk compared to lidocaine, particularly for procedures in the lithotomy position 5, 2
  • Avoid continuous spinal anesthesia with lidocaine: Risk of persistent neuropathy is as high as 1 in 200 with continuous spinal lidocaine 2
  • Consider alternative techniques: General anesthesia or peripheral nerve blocks may be safer options for high-risk patients 1

Step 4: Informed Consent

  • Discuss the specific risk of worsening radiculopathy with patients who have preexisting spinal stenosis or radicular symptoms 3
  • Document that transient radicular irritation can occur in up to one-third of patients and may be severe, though typically resolves within 1 week 2
  • Explain that persistent neurologic deficits, while uncommon, can occur and may require prolonged recovery or surgical intervention 4, 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Underestimating the significance of "just back pain": Two patients with preexisting spinal stenosis characterized preoperatively solely by nonradicular back pain developed severe neurologic complications after spinal anesthesia 3
  • Assuming all local anesthetics carry equal risk: Lidocaine is demonstrably more neurotoxic than bupivacaine or tetracaine at equipotent concentrations 2
  • Failing to consider surgical positioning: The combination of neuraxial blockade and prolonged lordotic positioning in patients with spinal stenosis may be particularly hazardous 3
  • Not obtaining baseline neurologic examination: Without documented preoperative neurologic status, it becomes difficult to determine whether postoperative deficits represent new injury or progression of preexisting disease 4

References

1
Research

[Risk management in epidural anesthesia].

Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology, 2011

Related Questions

What are the management and treatment options for patients experiencing lower extremity numbness after a lumbar epidural?
What is the explanation for anisocoria during a total spinal as a complication of epidural anesthesia?
What are the guidelines and precautions for administering epidural anesthesia?
What is the difference between epidural anesthesia and lumbar puncture (LP)?
Why does lidocaine (a local anesthetic) not significantly affect neuromonitoring in patients undergoing surgical procedures, such as neurosurgery or orthopedic spine surgery?
What are the indications, dosing schedule, contraindications, side effects, monitoring requirements, and dental precautions for Prolia (denosumab) in the treatment of osteoporosis?
How can we prevent self‑removal of a PEG tube and manage persistently high gastric residual volumes (>120 mL) in a 66‑year‑old woman with severe intellectual disability?
In a 69-year-old chronic smoker with a 10-year history of diabetes mellitus and a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio indicating normoalbuminuria, what is the next appropriate management step?
What oral glucocorticoid (e.g., prednisone) dose and duration is appropriate for an adult without diabetes, hypertension, or active infection who has a diffuse pruritic rash that began after a recent viral respiratory illness?
What is the appropriate post‑procedure assessment for a patient after endovascular coiling of a ruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysm?
Can you explain pes planus (flat foot) in simple terms, including its causes, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Ask Question