In a 78-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation, poor balance and high fall risk, should she be switched from rivaroxaban (Xarelto) to apixaban (Eliquis)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 17, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Switch to Apixaban for This High-Fall-Risk Patient

In a 78-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation, poor balance, and high fall risk currently on rivaroxaban, you should switch to apixaban 5 mg twice daily (or 2.5 mg twice daily if she meets ≥2 dose-reduction criteria). Apixaban has superior bleeding safety—particularly for intracranial hemorrhage—which is the critical concern in fall-prone patients, while maintaining equivalent stroke prevention.


Why Apixaban Is Preferred in High-Fall-Risk Patients

Intracranial Hemorrhage Risk

  • Apixaban reduced intracranial hemorrhage by 49% compared to warfarin (0.24%/year vs 0.47%/year) in the ARISTOTLE trial, and this advantage extends to comparisons with rivaroxaban 1, 2.
  • In a large Medicare study of 581,451 patients, rivaroxaban was associated with 26% higher risk of major hemorrhagic events compared to apixaban (HR 1.26,95% CI 1.16-1.36), including significantly more fatal extracranial bleeding 3.
  • A Canadian population study of 73,342 older AF patients found apixaban reduced major bleeding by 35-37% compared to rivaroxaban in both high-risk (HR 0.69) and low-risk (HR 0.63) bleeding populations, with no difference in stroke prevention 4, 5.

Pharmacokinetic Safety Margin

  • Apixaban has only 27% renal clearance compared to rivaroxaban's 35-66% renal elimination, providing a wider safety margin as patients age and renal function fluctuates 1, 6.
  • This lower renal dependence is particularly important in elderly patients with declining kidney function, which is common in the 78-year-old age group 2, 6.

Determining the Correct Apixaban Dose

The "2-of-3" Dose-Reduction Algorithm

Use apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily ONLY if your patient meets ≥2 of these three criteria 1, 2:

  1. Age ≥80 years
  2. Body weight ≤60 kg
  3. Serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL

If she meets 0-1 criteria, use the standard 5 mg twice daily dose 1, 2.

Critical Dosing Pitfall to Avoid

  • Do NOT reduce the dose based solely on fall risk, perceived frailty, or age 78 years alone—these are not validated dose-reduction criteria 1, 2.
  • Studies show that 9.4-40.4% of apixaban prescriptions involve inappropriate underdosing, often driven by clinician concern about bleeding risk when formal criteria are not met 2.
  • Underdosing increases stroke risk without improving bleeding safety 2, 7.

Practical Switching Protocol

Step-by-Step Transition

  1. Stop rivaroxaban after the last dose 2.
  2. Start apixaban at the next scheduled dosing time (no washout period needed; rivaroxaban's half-life is 5-9 hours) 2.
  3. Calculate creatinine clearance using Cockcroft-Gault equation (not eGFR) to verify renal function 2.
  4. Apply the 2-of-3 criteria to determine 5 mg vs 2.5 mg twice-daily dosing 2.

Renal Function Monitoring

  • Reassess renal function at least annually, or every 3-6 months if CrCl <60 mL/min 2.
  • Use the Cockcroft-Gault equation consistently, as this was the method used in pivotal trials and FDA labeling 2.

Why Not Continue Rivaroxaban?

Comparative Safety Evidence

  • The 2021 JAMA study of Medicare beneficiaries showed rivaroxaban had 18% higher risk of the composite primary outcome (major ischemic or hemorrhagic events) compared to apixaban (HR 1.18,95% CI 1.12-1.24) 3.
  • Rivaroxaban doubled the risk of nonfatal extracranial bleeding (HR 2.07) and increased fatal bleeding by 41% (HR 1.41) compared to apixaban 3.
  • These risks were present in both standard-dose and reduced-dose rivaroxaban groups 3.

Real-World Dosing Concerns

  • A German study found that 52.1% of patients receiving reduced-dose rivaroxaban (15 mg) did not meet labeling criteria for dose reduction, suggesting widespread inappropriate underdosing 7.
  • Inappropriate rivaroxaban dose reduction was associated with higher ischemic stroke rates in real-world data 8.

Special Considerations for Fall-Risk Patients

The Fall-Risk Paradox

  • Anticoagulation remains beneficial even in high-fall-risk patients because the stroke risk from untreated AF far exceeds the intracranial hemorrhage risk from falls 1.
  • However, choosing the anticoagulant with the lowest intracranial bleeding risk is critical—this is apixaban 1, 2, 3.

Guideline Support

  • The 2012 ESC guidelines note that apixaban had lower major bleeding than warfarin (31% reduction) and suggest it may be preferable in patients where bleeding risk is a concern 1.
  • The 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines emphasize that apixaban demonstrated superiority over warfarin for both efficacy and safety, including in older patients 1.

Drug Interactions to Screen

Reduce Apixaban to 2.5 mg Twice Daily If:

  • Patient is taking combined P-glycoprotein AND strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole, ritonavir, itraconazole) 2.

Avoid Apixaban If:

  • Patient is taking strong CYP3A4 inducers (rifampin, carbamazepine, phenytoin) 2.

Monitoring After the Switch

No Routine Lab Monitoring Required

  • No INR monitoring needed with apixaban 1.
  • Monitor clinically for bleeding symptoms, particularly gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly patients 2.

When to Reassess

  • Renal function annually (or every 3-6 months if declining) 2.
  • Review fall-prevention strategies and consider physical therapy to address balance issues 2.

Bottom Line Algorithm

  1. Assess the 3 dose-reduction criteria (age, weight, serum creatinine).
  2. Count criteria: 0-1 → 5 mg twice daily; ≥2 → 2.5 mg twice daily.
  3. Calculate CrCl using Cockcroft-Gault.
  4. Screen for drug interactions (P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors/inducers).
  5. Stop rivaroxaban and start apixaban at the next scheduled dose.
  6. Monitor renal function per schedule above.

The evidence strongly favors apixaban in this high-fall-risk, elderly patient due to its superior bleeding safety profile, particularly for intracranial hemorrhage, while maintaining equivalent stroke prevention 3, 4, 5.

Related Questions

What are the risks and benefits of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in different age groups, considering Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) like apixaban (Eliquis) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto)?
What is the dose of rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation?
Are weight loss medications safe to use while taking anticoagulants like Eliquis (apixaban) or Xarelto (rivaroxaban)?
Can a patient be on both Eliquis (apixaban) and Xarelto (rivaroxaban) at the same time?
Is there a clinically significant relationship between atrial fibrillation (afib) and pulmonary artery stenosis?
What are appropriate pharmacologic add‑on options to an SSRI for treating persistent anxiety in a 15‑year‑old female?
Which specialist is most appropriate for referring an adult patient with suspected or confirmed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?
How can clonidine be used off‑label to treat severe agitation in a child aged ≥2 years after non‑pharmacologic measures have failed and other agents are unsuitable, including dosing, monitoring, contraindications, and alternatives?
Can I increase Abilify (aripiprazole) from 10 mg to 15 mg in an adult patient without contraindications?
In an 80‑year‑old woman with mean corpuscular hemoglobin 25.3 pg, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration 30.8 g/dL, red cell distribution width 15.5 %, and hemoglobin A1c 6.5 %, what is the most likely diagnosis and appropriate treatment?
In an elderly hospice patient with non‑draining lower‑extremity cellulitis and a sulfa allergy, should clindamycin 300 mg orally every six hours be prescribed for five days or seven days?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.