How should I manage a 69-year-old female diagnosed with osteopenia (bone mineral density T-score –1.0 to –2.5)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 17, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Osteopenia in a 69-Year-Old Female

For a 69-year-old woman with osteopenia (T-score -1.0 to -2.5), treatment decisions should be based on calculated 10-year fracture risk using FRAX, not the T-score alone, with pharmacological therapy reserved for those meeting specific high-risk criteria. 1

Initial Risk Stratification

Calculate the patient's 10-year fracture risk using FRAX immediately to determine whether pharmacological intervention is warranted. 1, 2 The diagnosis of osteopenia alone does not constitute a treatment imperative, as the number needed to treat exceeds 100 in this population compared to 10-20 in patients with established osteoporosis. 2

Key Risk Factors to Assess

  • Personal history of fragility fracture after age 50 (strongest indicator for treatment) 1
  • Family history of hip fracture (particularly maternal hip fracture after age 50) 3, 1
  • Current smoking status 3, 1
  • Low body weight (BMI <24 or weight <127 lbs) 3, 1
  • History of prolonged glucocorticoid use (>6 months) 1
  • Height loss >4 cm (suggests vertebral compression fractures) 3

Non-Pharmacological Management (First-Line for All Patients)

All osteopenic patients should receive comprehensive lifestyle interventions regardless of fracture risk: 1

  • Calcium supplementation: 1,000-1,200 mg daily (through diet or supplements) 4, 1
  • Vitamin D supplementation: 800-1,000 IU daily 4, 1
  • Weight-bearing and resistance exercise regimen 4, 1
  • Smoking cessation and alcohol limitation 4, 1

These interventions may reduce hip fracture risk independent of bone density and should be implemented before considering pharmacological therapy. 3, 5

Indications for Pharmacological Therapy

Initiate bisphosphonate therapy if the patient meets ANY of the following criteria: 1, 2

  • 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk ≥20% (based on FRAX calculation) 6
  • 10-year hip fracture risk ≥3% 6
  • History of fragility fracture after age 50 (hip, vertebral, proximal humerus, or pelvis) 1, 6
  • Two or more additional risk factors (family history of hip fracture, current smoking, BMI <24, glucocorticoid use >6 months) 1

A 2024 Lancet review supports that major osteoporotic fracture risks of 10-15% could be acceptable indications for treatment with generic bisphosphonates in motivated patients older than 65 years, as most fractures occur in osteopenic individuals due to their greater numbers. 7

Pharmacological Treatment Options

If treatment is indicated, oral bisphosphonates are first-line therapy: 1, 2

  • Alendronate 70 mg once weekly 4
  • Risedronate 35 mg once weekly or 150 mg once monthly 4, 1
  • Ibandronate 150 mg once monthly 4, 1

Alternative Options

  • Zoledronic acid 5 mg IV every 2 years (for patients unable to tolerate oral bisphosphonates or with adherence concerns) 1
  • Denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months (particularly for patients who cannot tolerate bisphosphonates) 1

Critical Administration Requirements for Oral Bisphosphonates

Patients must meet ALL of the following criteria to safely use oral bisphosphonates: 4

  • Ability to stand or sit upright for at least 30 minutes after taking medication 4
  • Take medication on an empty stomach with plain water only 4
  • No esophageal abnormalities or swallowing difficulties 4

The American Geriatrics Society case example illustrates that patients with hiatal hernia or poor medication adherence may not be suitable candidates for oral bisphosphonates. 3

Monitoring Strategy

Repeat BMD measurement in 1-2 years to assess for progression or treatment response. 4, 1 Ensure measurements are conducted at the same facility using the same DXA system for accurate comparison, as a significant change is considered 1.1% or greater. 1

Evaluate for secondary causes of osteoporosis if initiating treatment, including serum calcium, phosphate, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, thyroid function, and renal function. 4

Treatment Duration

Bisphosphonate therapy typically continues for 3-5 years, then reassess the need for continuation based on fracture risk and BMD response. 4 Evidence shows benefits begin after 9-12 months of treatment in high-risk patients. 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not initiate pharmacologic therapy based solely on T-score without calculating fracture risk, as osteopenia encompasses a wide range of fracture risks. 5, 2
  • Address calcium and vitamin D deficiency before initiating pharmacologic therapy to optimize treatment response. 1
  • If denosumab is used, never discontinue without transitioning to another antiresorptive agent due to risk of rebound bone loss and increased fracture risk. 1
  • Proton pump inhibitors decrease calcium absorption and increase fracture risk, which should be considered in the overall risk assessment. 3
  • Degenerative changes in the lumbar spine may artificially elevate BMD measurements, potentially masking true bone loss. 1

Special Consideration for Vertebral Fractures

Consider DXA vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) if the patient has: 3

  • Age ≥70 years with T-score <-1.0 3
  • Historical height loss >4 cm 3
  • Self-reported but undocumented prior vertebral fracture 3
  • Glucocorticoid use ≥5 mg prednisone daily for ≥3 months 3

Vertebral fractures are diagnostic of osteoporosis even with osteopenic BMD values and significantly elevate future fracture risk. 8, 6

References

Guideline

Management of Osteopenia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Treatment of osteopenia.

Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2012

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Osteoporosis Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2014

Research

Osteopenia: a key target for fracture prevention.

The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2024

Research

Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis.

The Practitioner, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.