Antifibrotic Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
For first-line treatment of RA-ILD, antifibrotics are not recommended; instead, use immunosuppression with mycophenolate, azathioprine, rituximab, or cyclophosphamide. 1 For progressive RA-ILD despite first-line immunosuppression, add nintedanib as the preferred antifibrotic, with pirfenidone as an alternative option. 1, 2
First-Line Treatment: Immunosuppression, Not Antifibrotics
The 2023 ACR/CHEST guidelines explicitly state that the expert panel could not reach consensus on recommending nintedanib as first-line therapy for RA-ILD, and they conditionally recommend against pirfenidone as first-line treatment for all systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated ILD (SARD-ILD), including RA-ILD. 1
Preferred first-line agents include:
- Mycophenolate (most preferred immunosuppressant) 2
- Rituximab (particularly beneficial when active inflammatory arthritis coexists with ILD) 2
- Azathioprine 1, 2
- Cyclophosphamide (especially for severe cases) 2
Short-term glucocorticoids (≤3 months) can be used as part of initial therapy, but long-term glucocorticoids should be avoided. 2
When to Add Antifibrotic Therapy
Defining Progressive Disease
Add antifibrotic therapy when RA-ILD progresses despite first-line immunosuppression, defined as: 1
- FVC decline ≥10% predicted within 24 months, OR
- FVC decline 5-10% predicted PLUS worsening respiratory symptoms or increased fibrosis on HRCT, OR
- Worsening respiratory symptoms AND increased fibrosis on HRCT
Critical distinction: Residual fibrotic changes on HRCT alone do not equal progression—comparison to baseline imaging is necessary to document increased fibrosis. 3
Nintedanib for Progressive RA-ILD
Nintedanib is the preferred antifibrotic for progressive RA-ILD. 1, 2
- Dosing: 150 mg twice daily (can reduce to 100 mg twice daily if not tolerated) 3
- Evidence: In the INBUILD trial subgroup analysis, nintedanib reduced FVC decline by 60% in progressive RA-ILD patients over 52 weeks 4
- Mechanism: Slows disease progression but does not reverse existing fibrosis 3
Adverse effects to anticipate: 3
- Diarrhea (most common—occurs in 75.7% vs 31.6% placebo)
- Other GI effects: abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss
- Liver enzyme elevations (AST, ALT)
- Real-world discontinuation rates are 18.5-30% due to adverse events 5, 6
Pirfenidone as Alternative
Pirfenidone can be added for progressive RA-ILD when nintedanib is not tolerated or contraindicated. 1, 2
- The ACR/CHEST guidelines conditionally recommend adding pirfenidone specifically for RA-ILD progression (but recommend against it for other SARD-ILD types) 1
- Real-world data show similar drug persistence between nintedanib and pirfenidone (median 150.3 weeks) 6
- Dose reduction required in 14% of patients due to adverse effects 5
Important Caveats
Do NOT add antifibrotics to stable patients: For patients on mycophenolate without evidence of ILD progression, the guidelines conditionally recommend against adding nintedanib or pirfenidone. 1, 3 Continue immunosuppression alone and monitor closely with PFTs every 3-6 months and HRCT within 6 months. 3, 7
Do NOT use upfront combination therapy: The guidelines conditionally recommend against combining nintedanib or pirfenidone with mycophenolate as initial therapy (before documented progression). 1
Additional Options for Refractory Progressive Disease
If RA-ILD continues to progress despite immunosuppression plus antifibrotic therapy: 1, 2
- Tocilizumab is conditionally recommended for RA-ILD progression
- Consider early referral for lung transplantation in severe, progressive cases 2, 3
Monitoring Strategy
Initial 3 years after diagnosis are critical for identifying progressive disease: 3
- PFTs every 3-6 months 3, 7
- HRCT within 6 months of diagnosis, then as needed to assess progression 2, 3
- Maintain low threshold for bronchoscopy in patients receiving pulse corticosteroids and immunosuppression due to high infection risk 7
Real-World Effectiveness
Real-world studies demonstrate that antifibrotics stabilize lung function in progressive RA-ILD: 5, 6
- FVC stabilization or modest improvement after antifibrotic initiation (mean improvement +4.7% at 1 year, +7.7% at 2 years) 5
- TLC improvement (600 ± 900 mL improvement vs 800 ± 300 mL decline pre-treatment) 6
- However, DLCO may continue to decline despite treatment 5, 6
- Drug retention at end of follow-up: 63% of patients remain on therapy 5