Split Liver Transplantation: Technical Steps
Split liver transplantation involves dividing a deceased donor liver into two functional grafts—typically a left lateral segment (segments II-III) for a pediatric recipient and an extended right lobe (segments I, IV-VIII) for an adult recipient, or alternatively splitting along the line of Cantlie into full right and full left lobes for two recipients. 1
Pre-Splitting Assessment and Planning
Donor Selection Criteria
- Evaluate donor liver anatomy, parenchymal quality, and volumetric adequacy to ensure both grafts will meet minimum size requirements 1
- The graft-to-recipient weight ratio must be at least 0.8% (e.g., a minimum graft weight of 640g for an 80kg recipient) 1
- Careful preoperative interrogation of aberrant hepatic arterial anatomy is essential to prevent vascular complications 2
- Assess hepatic vein patency and anatomical relations, particularly middle hepatic vein tributaries 2
Recipient Matching
- For adult-child splits: the left lateral lobe (segments II-III, approximately 450g) is suitable for small children, while the extended right lobe goes to adults 1, 3
- For adult-adult splits: division along Cantlie's line creates right lobe (segments V-VIII) and left lobe (segments I-IV) 1
- The left lobe typically weighs approximately 450g, limiting its use to recipients weighing 50-55kg 1, 3
Surgical Technique: Splitting Procedure
In Situ vs Ex Situ Splitting
- Splitting can be performed either in situ (in the donor) or ex situ (on the back table after procurement) 4, 5
- Both approaches are viable, with selection based on local expertise and donor stability 4
Parenchymal Division Steps
- For adult-child splits: Divide the liver to create a left lateral segment (II-III) and extended right lobe (I, IV-VIII) 1
- For adult-adult splits: Divide along the line of Cantlie, creating anatomically complete right and left lobes 1, 6
- The falciform ligament marks the division between medial and lateral segments of the left lobe 3
Vascular Reconstruction
- Complete parenchymal division before ligating and transecting the right hepatic artery to minimize vascular complications 2
- Arterial anastomoses are particularly challenging due to small vessel diameter (3-4mm), requiring precise microsurgical technique 2
- Each graft requires separate reconstruction of hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic veins 1
- The left lateral graft typically has three separate suprahepatic veins requiring bench surgery reconstruction 1
Biliary Reconstruction
- Liberal use of cholangiograms and bile leak tests is critical, as bile duct complications represent the most common donor complication 2
- Each graft requires separate biliary reconstruction, typically with duct-to-duct anastomosis 1
Implantation Technique
Recipient Hepatectomy
- The piggy-back technique (preserving recipient IVC) is most commonly used in Europe 1
- Anastomosis of donor suprahepatic IVC to recipient's three hepatic veins is performed 1
- Selective use of temporary portocaval shunt or veno-venous bypass may be considered 1
Vascular Anastomoses
- Reconstruct portal vein with end-to-end anastomosis 1
- Hepatic artery reconstruction requires meticulous technique given small vessel caliber 2
- Hepatic vein anastomosis connects donor suprahepatic IVC to recipient hepatic vein confluence 1
Biliary Anastomosis
- Duct-to-duct anastomosis between donor and recipient bile ducts is standard 1
- In recipients with diseased ducts, Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is performed 1
Critical Technical Considerations
Avoiding Small-for-Size Syndrome
- Ensure minimum graft-to-recipient weight ratio of 0.8% to prevent graft dysfunction 1
- For adult recipients, right lobe grafts are typically required to meet volume requirements 1
Complication Prevention
- Approximately one-third of living donors experience complications, with right lobe donors having significantly higher rates than left lobe donors 2
- Biliary complications and hepatic artery thrombosis are more common in split grafts compared to whole organs 7
- Despite increased short-term complications, long-term graft and patient survival are comparable to whole organ transplantation when performed at experienced centers 4, 5, 7