When is immunotherapy appropriate and what are the recommended agents, dosing regimens, and eligibility criteria for solid tumors, hematologic malignancies, and autoimmune diseases?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Immunotherapy: Appropriate Use, Agents, and Eligibility Criteria

Solid Tumors

Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)

Every patient with advanced RCC should receive anti-PD-1-based therapy as initial treatment unless a specific contraindication exists. 1

  • First-line therapy selection:

    • Anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination with CTLA-4 inhibitors (nivolumab/ipilimumab) or VEGFR TKIs are standard options 1
    • Patients with sarcomatoid histology derive particularly strong benefit from immunotherapy relative to VEGF TKI therapy 1
    • Papillary and unclassified RCC should also receive IO-based therapy in the first-line setting 1
  • Eligibility criteria for RCC immunotherapy:

    • Patients must NOT have active autoimmune conditions requiring immunosuppressive therapy 1
    • Patients must NOT have a history of potentially life-threatening autoimmune conditions 1
    • Patients must NOT require corticosteroids for other conditions (e.g., brain metastases, spinal cord compression, lymphangitic tumor spread) 1
    • Baseline CNS imaging is recommended for all patients; bone imaging should be considered for symptomatic patients 1

Cutaneous Melanoma

For stage IIB or IIC melanoma, clinical trial enrollment is the preferred recommendation, with interferon-α2b as an alternative only in highly selected patients. 1

  • Adjuvant therapy for high-risk stage II melanoma (>4mm depth or >2-4mm with ulceration):

    • Clinical trial participation is preferred (45% panel recommendation) 1
    • Interferon-α2b may be considered (10% panel recommendation) only in patients with good performance status, no significant depression, no psychiatric history, and no underlying autoimmune disease 1
    • Observation is acceptable for lower-risk patients (20% panel recommendation) 1
  • Critical limitation: No survival benefit has been demonstrated for interferon-α2b in stage II melanoma across multiple randomized trials, despite some showing relapse-free survival improvements 1

Special Populations

HIV-Infected Patients

HIV-infected individuals with undetectable viral load on cART should be considered for immunotherapy without restriction. 1

  • Eligibility requirements:

    • Plasma viral load (pVL) must be undetectable before starting immunotherapy 1
    • Patients must continue cART throughout immunotherapy 1
    • CD4+ T cell counts should preferably be above 200 cells/mm³ 1
    • CD4+ counts below 100 cells/mm³ are not an absolute contraindication but require careful risk-benefit assessment 1
  • Preferred agents:

    • Pembrolizumab is the preferred anti-PD-1 antibody based on concordant prospective and retrospective safety data 1
    • Durvalumab is the preferred anti-PD-L1 antibody based on clinical trial safety data 1
    • Nivolumab has been used with good tolerance but has less robust prospective data 1
  • Monitoring: HIV screening is not mandatory before immunotherapy except for AIDS-defining cancers or high-risk populations (sex workers, men who have sex with men, intravenous drug users) 1

Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Previous allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is not an absolute contraindication to anti-PD-1 therapy, though graft-versus-host disease risk is substantially elevated. 1

  • Anti-PD-1 therapy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation carries high risk of graft-versus-host disease and immune-related toxicities but may be considered when no other treatment options exist 1

Pregnancy

Pregnancy during immunotherapy must be avoided, but if cancer develops during pregnancy, checkpoint inhibitors are not absolutely contraindicated. 1

  • Three case reports document treatment with nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab during pregnancy without major obstetric complications 1
  • The risk of abortion and premature delivery is theoretically increased due to disruption of maternal-fetal immune tolerance 1
  • Data on teratogenic potential in humans are lacking 1

Pre-existing Autoimmune Disease

Autoimmune disorders are not an absolute contraindication to immunotherapy, but individual risk-benefit assessment is mandatory. 1

  • Flare-ups of pre-existing autoimmune disease occur in 27-50% of cases, with 10-25% being high grade 1
  • Additional immune-related adverse events occur in 25-30% of cases 1
  • Response rates appear favorable in this population despite increased toxicity 1

Contraindications and Precautions

Absolute Contraindications

  • Active autoimmune conditions requiring immunosuppressive therapy 1
  • History of potentially life-threatening autoimmune conditions 1
  • Concurrent need for corticosteroids (for brain metastases, spinal cord compression, etc.) 1
  • Severe immunodeficiency (for live vaccines in immunotherapy patients) 2

Relative Contraindications Requiring Careful Assessment

  • CD4+ T cell counts below 100 cells/mm³ in HIV patients 1
  • Pregnancy (not absolute, but requires careful consideration) 1
  • Pre-existing autoimmune disease (requires individual evaluation) 1
  • Recent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (high GVHD risk) 1

Monitoring and Response Evaluation

Response evaluation should use RECIST v1.1 for reporting endpoints, but immune-related response criteria (irRC or iRECIST) better capture immunotherapy-specific response patterns. 1

  • Pseudo-progression (initial tumor size increase followed by reduction) is uncommon but possible 1
  • Most progression is real and requires treatment change 1
  • Patients tolerating immunotherapy with asymptomatic disease progression or mixed response should be considered for treatment beyond RECIST-defined progression 1

Critical Management Considerations

Immune-Related Adverse Events with Bulbar Involvement

Any bulbar symptoms from immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myositis require immediate high-dose corticosteroids plus IVIG and/or plasma exchange. 3

  • ICI-induced myositis occurs in approximately 1% of patients, with median onset at 4 weeks 3
  • Bulbar involvement carries approximately 20% mortality rate (compared to <10% for idiopathic inflammatory myositis) 3
  • Immunotherapy must be withdrawn for grade 2 or higher symptoms 3
  • Cardiac evaluation is mandatory as myocarditis is part of the myositis spectrum 3

Patient Education

  • Patients should receive written literature or online resources about immunotherapy mechanisms, available treatments, and expected toxicities 1
  • Clear guidance on when to contact providers is essential given the unpredictable toxicity profile 1
  • Early symptom reporting helps prevent grade 3 adverse events 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume all progression on imaging represents treatment failure—consider immune-related response patterns 1
  • Do not withhold immunotherapy from HIV patients with well-controlled disease and adequate CD4+ counts 1
  • Do not delay cardiac evaluation in patients with suspected myositis, as myocarditis can be fatal 3
  • Do not use interferon-α2b for stage II melanoma expecting survival benefit—clinical trials are preferred 1
  • Do not assume autoimmune disease is an absolute contraindication—individual assessment is required 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Indications for Postponing Vaccines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Rheumatological Causes of Bulbar Palsy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.