What is the median time to disease recurrence after a bilobectomy for stage IIIA non‑small cell lung cancer with a matted N2 lymph‑node station?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Mean Recurrence Timeline After Bilobectomy for Stage IIIA NSCLC with Matted N2 Lymph Nodes

The median time to recurrence after bilobectomy for stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer with matted N2 disease is approximately 15.9-18.8 months, with the highest risk period occurring at 9-11 months post-operatively. 1, 2

Recurrence Timeline and Risk Profile

Stage IIIA disease with N2 involvement carries a substantially elevated recurrence risk of 52-72%, compared to only 11-22% in early-stage disease. 3, 1 The temporal pattern shows:

  • Peak recurrence risk occurs at 9-11 months after surgery, representing the modal time point for relapse 1
  • Median time to any recurrence ranges from 15.9 to 18.8 months across multiple studies 2, 4
  • Additional smaller peaks in recurrence occur at 2 years and 4 years post-resection 5

Bilobectomy-Specific Considerations

Bilobectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for stage IIIA-N2 disease carries particularly poor outcomes, with survival and recurrence patterns similar to pneumonectomy rather than standard lobectomy. 6 Key findings include:

  • Late postoperative mortality (within 90 days) for bilobectomy is 13%, compared to 5.9% for lobectomy 6
  • Overall survival is significantly worse after bilobectomy compared to lobectomy (p = 0.041) 6
  • Recurrence rates are elevated, though not statistically different from pneumonectomy 6

Impact of Matted N2 Disease on Recurrence

The presence of persistent N2 disease after neoadjuvant therapy dramatically worsens prognosis, with only 9% five-year survival compared to 35.8% for patients downstaged to N0. 4 Specific risk factors include:

  • Positive lymph node status doubles the hazard of any recurrence (HR 2.00; 95% CI 1.54-2.61) 3, 1
  • For distant metastatic recurrence specifically, N2 involvement increases risk (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.4-2.18) 3, 1
  • Multiple mediastinal station involvement (matted nodes) confers under 5% five-year survival, compared to 30-47% for single-station N2 disease 7

Pattern of Recurrence

Distant metastases predominate in stage IIIA disease, accounting for 50-66% of all recurrences, with locoregional recurrence occurring in 34-50% of patients. 3, 1 The distribution shows:

  • Most recurrences (approximately 82%) involve distant sites, either alone (50%) or combined with locoregional disease (32%) 2
  • Common distant sites include brain, bone, liver, adrenal glands, and distant lymph nodes 3, 1
  • Stage IIIA patients present symptomatically in 61% of recurrences, compared to only 32% in early-stage disease, indicating more aggressive biology 3, 1

Critical Surveillance Requirements

Contrast-enhanced chest CT should be performed every 6 months for the first 2-3 years post-bilobectomy, as this captures the highest-risk period for recurrence. 3, 1, 5 The surveillance strategy should include:

  • CT chest with IV contrast at minimum at 12 and 24 months, though every 6 months is preferred for stage IIIA 5
  • Full restaging with PET/CT and brain MRI when recurrence is suspected 3
  • Scheduled imaging detects 60-100% of recurrences when asymptomatic, but patients must be counseled to report new symptoms immediately rather than waiting for scheduled visits 3, 1, 5

Prognostic Factors Affecting Recurrence Timeline

Several factors modify the expected recurrence timeline:

  • Adenocarcinoma histology worsens prognosis compared to squamous cell carcinoma 4
  • Nonsquamous tumors paradoxically show protective effect in some analyses (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.33-0.49) 3, 1
  • Incomplete resection (R1/R2) dramatically increases recurrence risk, with approximately 75% of patients experiencing recurrence 3
  • Limited mediastinal lymph node sampling (versus systematic dissection) increases recurrence risk (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.10-1.86) 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume normal surveillance imaging excludes recurrence in symptomatic patients—proceed directly to comprehensive restaging 3, 8
  • Do not rely on chest radiography for surveillance, as it has only 21% sensitivity for detecting recurrence 8
  • Do not discontinue surveillance after 5 years, as second primary lung cancers continue to occur at a constant rate of 3-6% per person-year indefinitely 8, 5

References

Guideline

Recurrence Risk in Stage III N1 T4 NSCLC with Recent Smoking Cessation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Follow-Up Care After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Significantly favourable outcome for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer stage IIIA/IIIB and single-station persistent N2 (skip or additionally N1) disease after multimodality treatment.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2022

Guideline

Post-Operative Surveillance After Bilobectomy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

After a bilobectomy for non‑small cell lung cancer with a matted mediastinal lymph node (stage IIIA), can I decline adjuvant platinum‑based chemotherapy and what alternative management options are appropriate?
Am I a candidate for chemotherapy after a post bilobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage 3 with T4 - N1 or N2, four weeks post-operative, currently recovering from pneumonia with significant weight loss and breathlessness?
Is a bilobectomy (surgical removal of two lobes of the lung) a suitable treatment option for an adult patient with stage 3 N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a history of smoking?
What is the 5‑year survival rate for a 67‑year‑old former smoker who underwent a bilobectomy for stage III non‑small‑cell lung cancer?
What is the risk of cancer recurrence in a patient with stage three T4 N1 (tumor size and lymph node involvement) cancer after undergoing a bilobectomy (surgical removal of two lobes of an organ)?
In a patient with a 3.7‑cm right‑lobe liver lesion identified on initial imaging, what is the appropriate next step—contrast‑enhanced hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), percutaneous core needle biopsy, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), or short‑term interval follow‑up?
In an 80‑year‑old man with urinary frequency 7–8 times daily, dysuria and hematuria, negative leukocyte‑esterase dipstick, no pyuria, and a culture showing only mixed normal flora, and who I plan to start tamsulosin (Flomax) and an unverified benzo‑pythium preparation, what additional treatment or management suggestions do you have?
What is the appropriate management for epistaxis?
What is the recommended clindamycin dosage, timing, and frequency for an adult patient with a dental abscess who has a penicillin allergy or suspected anaerobic infection?
Patient with urine culture showing 10,000‑49,000 CFU/mL Group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae), many bacteria on urinalysis, trace leukocyte esterase, ≤5 WBC per high‑power field, and no urinary symptoms—what is the appropriate next step in management?
What is the step‑by‑step management of an adult with an anterior nosebleed, including compression, topical vasoconstrictor (oxymetazoline or phenylephrine), cautery, nasal packing, and special considerations for hypertension and anticoagulation (warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants, aspirin)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.