Renal Cortical Thickness in Chronic Kidney Disease
In adults with CKD, cortical thickness <7 mm indicates advanced disease with poor prognosis, while thickness ≥7 mm suggests preserved renal parenchyma; cortical thickness correlates more strongly with eGFR than renal length and should be routinely measured and reported on ultrasound. 1
Specific Cortical Thickness Measurements and Clinical Significance
Normal and Abnormal Thresholds
- Normal cortical thickness ranges from approximately 7-11 mm in adults without kidney disease 2, 3
- Cortical thickness <7 cm is definitely abnormal and indicates significant parenchymal loss, though the ACR guidelines reference this as renal length rather than cortical thickness 1
- Mean cortical thickness of 5.76 mm correlates with mean eGFR of 35.92 mL/min (CKD Stage 3b), while thickness of 5.28 mm correlates with eGFR of 28.38 mL/min (CKD Stage 4) 2
- Cortical thickness <5 mm strongly suggests advanced CKD requiring immediate nephrology referral 4
Prognostic Value for CKD Progression
- Height-adjusted cortical thickness ≤4.0 mm/cm predicts >30% decline in renal function or dialysis initiation with 72.5% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity over 2 years 5
- Cortical thickness shows stronger correlation with eGFR (r=0.85, P<0.01) than renal length (r=0.66, P<0.01), making it the superior measurement for assessing kidney function 2
- Reduced cortical thickness is an independent predictor of CKD presence (OR 6.14,95% CI 1.59-23.62), second only to increased cortical echogenicity 6
Measurement Technique
Proper Ultrasound Protocol
- Measure cortical thickness in the sagittal plane over a medullary pyramid, perpendicular to the capsule to ensure accurate and reproducible measurements 3
- Measure both kidneys and report mean cortical thickness along with renal length in all CKD patients 2, 3
- Adjust cortical thickness for body height (divide by height in cm) when assessing progression risk, as height-adjusted values provide better prognostic accuracy 5
Clinical Decision Algorithm Based on Cortical Thickness
Cortical Thickness ≥7 mm (Relatively Preserved)
- CKD diagnosis still requires laboratory confirmation with eGFR and UACR, as normal ultrasound does not exclude disease, particularly in diabetic nephropathy or hypertension 1, 4
- Consider kidney biopsy if clinical features are atypical (rapid decline, active sediment, nephrotic-range proteinuria without diabetic retinopathy) despite preserved cortical thickness 4
- Monitor with ultrasound every 6-12 months to track progression, as cortical thinning precedes significant functional decline 2, 7
Cortical Thickness 5-7 mm (Moderate Loss)
- Expect eGFR in the range of 25-40 mL/min (CKD Stage 3b-4) based on correlation studies 2, 3
- Increase monitoring frequency to every 3-6 months with both laboratory testing and ultrasound 7
- Initiate nephrology referral if not already established, as patients are approaching need for renal replacement therapy planning 4
Cortical Thickness <5 mm (Severe Loss)
- Immediate nephrology referral is mandatory, as this indicates advanced CKD with high risk of progression to ESKD 4
- Avoid all nephrotoxic agents (NSAIDs, aminoglycosides, iodinated contrast) and adjust all medications for reduced GFR 4
- Initiate renal replacement therapy planning including vascular access evaluation and transplant eligibility assessment 4
- Loss of corticomedullary differentiation typically accompanies severe cortical thinning and confirms advanced disease 1
Important Caveats and Pitfalls
When Cortical Thickness May Be Misleading
- Diabetic nephropathy and infiltrative disorders initially preserve kidney size and cortical thickness despite declining function, so normal measurements do not exclude significant CKD in these populations 1, 8
- Polycystic kidney disease maintains or increases kidney size despite progressive dysfunction, making cortical thickness measurements less useful 8
- Acute kidney injury superimposed on CKD may show preserved cortical thickness if the chronic component is mild 1
Complementary Assessments Required
- Always measure renal resistive index (RI) with Doppler ultrasound, as RI >0.8 predicts CKD progression independent of cortical thickness 1, 7
- Assess cortical echogenicity, as increased echogenicity (OR 27.33) is the strongest ultrasonographic predictor of CKD, even more than cortical thickness 6
- Evaluate for hydronephrosis, stones, and renal artery stenosis during the same examination, as these findings may alter management 1
Limitations of Ultrasound in CKD
- Ultrasound findings contributed to diagnosis in only 5.9% and affected management in only 3.3% of 1,007 CKD patients, indicating limited utility for routine surveillance 1
- Ultrasound has minimal impact on diagnosis and management in patients with CKD from diabetes or hypertension, the two most common causes 1
- Ultrasound is most useful when there is prior history of stones, obstruction, renal artery stenosis, frequent UTIs, or family history of polycystic kidney disease 1