How can a gap between the vocal cords (glottic insufficiency) be repaired in an adult patient?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Repairing Glottic Insufficiency (Vocal Cord Gap)

For adults with a gap between the vocal cords, injection medialization with temporary resorbable materials (collagen, hyaluronic acid gel, or lyophilized dermis) is the first-line surgical intervention, ideally performed within six months of onset to reduce the need for more invasive permanent procedures. 1

Treatment Algorithm

Initial Management: Voice Therapy

  • Voice therapy should be the first-line treatment for glottic insufficiency, including presbylarynx and vocal fold paralysis, before considering surgical intervention 2
  • Voice therapy can be combined with surgical approaches to optimize outcomes, including pre- and post-operative therapy 2
  • Surgery is reserved for cases where satisfactory voice results cannot be achieved with conservative management alone 2

Surgical Intervention: Injection Medialization (First-Line)

Timing & Materials:

  • Early intervention within six months of onset significantly decreases the need for permanent transcervical medialization procedures 1
  • Use temporary, resorbable injectable implants (collagen, hyaluronic acid gel, or lyophilized dermis) as they allow time for potential neural recovery while avoiding permanent tissue alteration 1
  • These materials leave no lasting adverse effect on vocal fold function if native motion returns 1

Procedure Setting:

  • Can be performed in the office under local anesthesia or in the operating room under general anesthesia with comparable voice outcomes 1
  • Office-based injection is cost-effective, well-tolerated, associated with minimal complications, and yields outcomes comparable to operating-room procedures 1

Expected Outcomes:

  • Prospective trials demonstrate significant improvement in validated voice quality-of-life measures in 94%–100% of patients with no major complications at six-month follow-up 1
  • Observational studies show comparable objective and subjective voice improvement between injection laryngoplasty and laryngeal framework surgery 1
  • Patients receiving temporary injection medialization are statistically less likely to require permanent surgical intervention compared to those managed conservatively 1

Surgical Intervention: Laryngeal Framework Surgery (Second-Line)

Indications:

  • Reserved for cases where injection medialization fails to achieve adequate closure or when permanent medialization is required 2, 3
  • Particularly useful for large glottic gaps that cannot be closed completely with injection alone 3
  • Can be combined with other phonosurgical procedures and is reversible and revisable 3

Technique:

  • External vocal fold medialization (thyroplasty) using implants to move the vocal fold to midline 3
  • Modified techniques using titanium sheets or glass ionomer cement implants have been developed 3
  • Significantly reduces the degree of glottic insufficiency, though complete closure of large gaps may not always be achievable 3

Critical Contraindication

Never use polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) as a permanent injectable implant—it causes foreign-body granulomas leading to voice deterioration, airway compromise, loss of mucosal wave, and poor vocal function 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Delaying intervention beyond six months: Early medialization establishes favorable vocal fold positioning that can be maintained by synkinetic reinnervation, whereas delayed treatment may result in lateralized fold position dependent solely on later reinnervation 1
  • Using permanent materials prematurely: Temporary materials should be preferred initially to allow for potential neural recovery 1
  • Skipping voice therapy: Even when surgery is planned, voice therapy should be integrated as it addresses behavioral and muscular issues contributing to dysphonia 2

Potential Complications

  • Dysphagia, airway obstruction, and breathy voice are possible complications 1
  • The overall benefit-harm assessment shows a clear preponderance of benefit over harm with current techniques 1
  • Current resorbable injectable agents minimize long-term complications 1

Special Populations

  • Pediatric patients: Collagen or lyophilized-dermis injections can achieve adequate vocal rehabilitation 1
  • Bilateral glottic insufficiency: Medialization techniques may be applied unilaterally or bilaterally depending on clinical scenario 1

References

Guideline

Guidelines for Vocal Cord Medialization (American Academy of Otolaryngology‑Head and Neck Surgery)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.