What is the recommended treatment for an adult with systemic sclerosis affecting the skin, joints, and interstitial lung disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis Affecting Joints, Skin, and Lungs

First-Line Therapy: Mycophenolate Mofetil

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is the preferred initial treatment for systemic sclerosis with skin, joint, and interstitial lung disease involvement. 1

  • MMF addresses all three disease manifestations simultaneously: it softens skin fibrosis, modifies disease trajectory, and treats pulmonary involvement 1, 2
  • The 2023 EULAR guidelines designate MMF as the novel first-line intervention with strong recommendation based on high-quality evidence 1, 2
  • MMF has surpassed cyclophosphamide as the initial therapy of choice, with mean modified Rodnan skin score improvement of approximately -4.90 points 1
  • Start MMF as monotherapy for both skin and lung manifestations 3

Critical Baseline Assessments Required

Before initiating therapy, obtain:

  • Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) with DLCO to detect subclinical ILD and establish baseline lung function 1
  • High-resolution CT (HRCT) of the chest as the primary diagnostic tool for ILD 1, 4
  • Echocardiogram to screen for pulmonary arterial hypertension 1
  • Blood pressure monitoring to establish baseline for scleroderma renal crisis surveillance 1

Alternative First-Line Option

  • Methotrexate (≈25 mg weekly) may be used when MMF is not tolerated or when musculoskeletal disease predominates, though evidence for joint disease benefit is limited 1, 3
  • Methotrexate produces approximately 5-point improvement in modified Rodnan skin score 1

Critical Steroid Avoidance

Glucocorticoids are strongly contraindicated as first-line therapy in systemic sclerosis-ILD. 5

  • The 2023 ACR/CHEST guidelines provide a strong recommendation against using glucocorticoids in SSc-ILD as first-line therapy 5
  • Corticosteroid monotherapy is associated with substantial long-term morbidity in fibrotic lung disease 3
  • Steroids increase risk of scleroderma renal crisis, particularly in early diffuse cutaneous SSc 1, 3
  • Reserve steroids only for rapidly progressive ILD with acute respiratory failure or acute exacerbation scenarios 3

Adding Antifibrotic Therapy

Nintedanib should be added when ILD remains fibrotic and progressive despite adequate MMF therapy, particularly if forced vital capacity (FVC) falls below 80% of predicted. 1, 2

  • Nintedanib provides targeted antifibrotic benefit and can be combined with MMF for synergistic effect addressing both inflammatory and fibrotic components 2
  • Pirfenidone is an alternative antifibrotic agent, though supporting evidence is less robust than for nintedanib 1, 3

Second-Line Biologic Options

If disease progresses on MMF or MMF is contraindicated:

  • Rituximab (anti-CD20) is incorporated into 2023 EULAR recommendations as a novel option for treating skin fibrosis and SSc-ILD 1, 2, 4
  • Tocilizumab (anti-IL-6) is similarly recommended by EULAR for patients who fail to achieve adequate response to MMF 1, 2, 4
  • Both biologics carry conditional recommendations 1, 2

Monitoring Strategy on MMF

  • Serial PFTs every 3-6 months to track forced vital capacity (FVC) 1, 3
  • Repeat HRCT at defined intervals to assess fibrosis progression 1, 3
  • Monitor modified Rodnan skin score at each visit to quantify skin improvement 1
  • Watch for progression indicators: worsening dyspnea, declining FVC >10%, or new HRCT changes 1, 3

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

AHSCT should be considered for patients with very high-risk features: modified Rodnan skin score >24 or moderate skin disease with worsening ILD despite conventional immunosuppression. 1, 2

  • Evidence shows improved survival in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis with high skin scores or progressive ILD 1, 2
  • Must be performed in specialized centers with expertise in HSCT for systemic sclerosis after rigorous multidisciplinary benefit-to-risk assessment 2

Adjunctive Management for Raynaud Phenomenon

  • Dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (e.g., nifedipine) are first-line for Raynaud phenomenon 1
  • Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors or intravenous iloprost when calcium-channel blockers are insufficient 1
  • Bosentan reduces incidence of new digital ulcers 1

Evidence Gaps for Joint Involvement

  • There is lack of high-quality evidence that corticosteroids, tocilizumab, or rituximab improve joint manifestations in systemic sclerosis 1
  • Abatacept has shown mixed results: case series suggest benefit for joint disease, but phase-2 trial did not demonstrate significant differences in swollen or tender joint counts at 12 months 1

Key Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume skin score improvement signifies overall disease control—ILD may progress independently and requires separate monitoring and targeted antifibrotic therapy when indicated 2
  • Avoid chronic corticosteroid use; if steroids must be used, keep doses ≤15 mg/day prednisone equivalent to minimize scleroderma renal crisis risk 3
  • Monitor closely in first few years after diagnosis, as risk of developing ILD is greatest early in the disease course 6

References

Guideline

Management of Systemic Sclerosis with Active Skin, Joint, and Lung Involvement

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Systemic Sclerosis with Pulmonary Fibrosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.