What is the specificity of soluble interleukin-2 (sIL-2) for diagnosing sarcoidosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL2R) has limited specificity for sarcoidosis, and its diagnostic value is enhanced when used in conjunction with clinical, radiological, and histological evidence of non-caseating granulomas. The specificity of sIL2R for sarcoidosis is not well-defined in the provided evidence, but it is known that elevated levels of sIL2R can be associated with various inflammatory and granulomatous conditions, including tuberculosis, lymphoma, and autoimmune disorders 1. The table provided in the evidence does not offer clear insights into the specificity of sIL2R for sarcoidosis, with percentages that seem unrelated to the question at hand.

Key Points to Consider

  • sIL2R levels are useful in evaluating disease activity and monitoring treatment response in patients with established sarcoidosis diagnosis 1.
  • Elevated serum levels of ACE, IL-2R, and lysozyme are usually associated with more aggressive disease and multiple-organ involvement 1.
  • Serum ACE is the most widely used laboratory test for the investigation of sarcoidosis, but sIL2R can provide additional information on disease activity 1.
  • The interpretation of sIL2R results should always consider the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and other laboratory markers, as well as the specific assay used and its reference ranges.

Clinical Application

In clinical practice, the use of sIL2R as a diagnostic tool for sarcoidosis should be approached with caution, considering its limited specificity and the potential for elevation in other conditions. Instead, sIL2R is more valuable for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Clinicians should rely on a comprehensive assessment, including clinical, radiological, and histological evidence, to diagnose sarcoidosis, and use sIL2R levels as one of several biomarkers to evaluate disease activity and guide management decisions 1.

From the Research

Specificity of sIL2 for Sarcoidosis

  • The specificity of sIL2 for sarcoidosis has been investigated in several studies, with varying results:
    • A systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2023 found a pooled specificity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.73-0.94) for sIL-2R levels in diagnosing sarcoidosis 2.
    • Another study published in 2019 reported a specificity of 85% for serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor levels in detecting sarcoidosis 3.
    • A systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2023 found a pooled specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.72-0.96) for sIL-2R in diagnosing sarcoidosis 4.
  • These studies suggest that sIL2 has a relatively high specificity for sarcoidosis, making it a useful diagnostic tool.

Comparison with Other Biomarkers

  • The specificity of sIL2 has been compared to other biomarkers, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE):
    • A study published in 2019 found that sIL-2R had a higher specificity (85%) than ACE (76%) in diagnosing sarcoidosis 3.
  • These findings suggest that sIL2 may be a more specific biomarker for sarcoidosis than ACE.

Clinical Implications

  • The high specificity of sIL2 for sarcoidosis makes it a useful tool for confirming the diagnosis in patients with suspected sarcoidosis:
    • A study published in 2020 found that high levels of sIL-2R were suggestive of sarcoidosis, although there was some overlap with other interstitial lung diseases 5.
  • The specificity of sIL2 can help clinicians distinguish between sarcoidosis and other conditions, allowing for more targeted treatment and management.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.