Treatment of Metastatic Bladder Cancer
First-Line Therapy: The New Standard
Pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin (EV + P) is now the preferred first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial bladder cancer, regardless of cisplatin eligibility, based on dramatic survival improvements showing median overall survival of 31.5 months versus 16.1 months with chemotherapy. 1
Evidence Supporting EV + P as First-Line
- The EV-302 phase III trial demonstrated overwhelming superiority with hazard ratios of 0.47 for overall survival and 0.45 for progression-free survival (12.5 vs 6.3 months) compared to platinum-based chemotherapy 1
- Objective response rate reached 67.7% versus 44.4% with chemotherapy, including complete responses in 29.1% versus 12.5% 1
- This represents a category 1 recommendation from NCCN, the highest level of evidence 1
- Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 55.9% (versus 69.5% with chemotherapy), demonstrating a more favorable toxicity profile 1
Key Toxicities to Monitor with EV + P
- Skin reactions (67.1% any grade, 17.1% grade ≥3) 2
- Peripheral neuropathy (60.5% any grade, 6.8% grade ≥3) 3
- Hyperglycemia (6.1% grade ≥3) 3
- Fatigue (9.2% grade ≥3) 2
Alternative First-Line Regimens When EV + P Is Unavailable
For Cisplatin-Eligible Patients
If pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin is not available, gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) remains the historical standard for cisplatin-eligible patients. 1
Cisplatin Eligibility Criteria
Patients must meet ALL of the following 3, 4:
- ECOG performance status 0-1
- Creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min
- No grade ≥2 hearing loss
- No grade ≥2 neuropathy
- No New York Heart Association Class III heart failure
Dosing for Gemcitabine-Cisplatin
- Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² IV on days 1,8, and 15 4
- Cisplatin 70 mg/m² IV on day 1 or 2 4
- Repeat every 21-28 days 4
- Expected median overall survival: 9-15 months 3, 1
Alternative Cisplatin-Based Option
- Dose-dense MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin) with growth factor support is an equivalent alternative 3, 1
- At 7.3 years median follow-up, 24.6% of patients were alive with ddMVAC versus 13.2% with standard MVAC 3
- ddMVAC showed improved toxicity and efficacy compared to standard 28-day MVAC, making standard MVAC obsolete 3
For Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients
Pembrolizumab plus enfortumab vedotin remains the preferred option (category 1) even for cisplatin-ineligible patients. 1
When EV + P Is Not Available
If EV + P cannot be used, the treatment algorithm depends on patient fitness and PD-L1 status 3:
Option 1: Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy
- Gemcitabine plus carboplatin for patients fit for carboplatin but not cisplatin 3, 1
- Response rates: 26-42% (lower than cisplatin-based regimens) 3, 4
- Increased toxicity in renally impaired patients 4
- This is a category 2B recommendation 3
Option 2: Checkpoint Inhibitor Monotherapy (Restricted)
- Atezolizumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy only for 3, 1:
- Patients with positive PD-L1 expression who are cisplatin-ineligible, OR
- Patients ineligible for any platinum-containing chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status
- Critical caveat: A 2018 FDA safety alert restricted first-line immunotherapy after trials demonstrated decreased survival versus platinum chemotherapy in patients with low PD-L1 expression 4
- Do not use checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in cisplatin-eligible patients, even with high PD-L1 expression 4
Treatment Duration and Response Assessment
- Re-evaluate after 2-3 cycles of chemotherapy 3
- Continue treatment for 2 more cycles if disease responds or remains stable 3
- Maximum of 6 cycles depending on response 3, 1
- Change therapy if no response after 2 cycles or if significant morbidities occur 3, 1
Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Avelumab maintenance should be initiated in patients with stable or improved disease after 4-6 cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. 1
- This represents a practice-changing treatment with the highest survival rates among maintenance strategies 5
- Extrapolated from urothelial carcinoma trials showing improved outcomes 4
- Only applicable if patient did not receive EV + P as first-line 3
Second-Line Therapy
After Progression on Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (Without Prior Immunotherapy)
Pembrolizumab monotherapy is the category 1 recommendation, demonstrating overall survival of 10.3 versus 7.4 months compared to chemotherapy (p=0.002). 1
- Only 15% grade 3-4 adverse events versus 49.4% with chemotherapy 1
- Other approved checkpoint inhibitors include atezolizumab, nivolumab, durvalumab, and avelumab, all approved regardless of PD-L1 expression 3, 1
After Progression on Immunotherapy
Enfortumab vedotin is strongly recommended for patients previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy who had disease progression during or after treatment with a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. 3
Subsequent-Line Therapy (Third-Line and Beyond)
For Patients Who Have Exhausted Standard Options
The treatment algorithm depends on prior platinum response and FGFR mutation status 6:
Option 1: Platinum Rechallenge (Preferred if Applicable)
- If platinum-free interval ≥6-12 months after initial therapy and patient remains platinum-eligible, rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy is preferred 6
- Retrospective analysis showed higher disease control rate and longer overall survival compared to non-platinum chemotherapy in platinum-sensitive patients 6
Option 2: Erdafitinib for FGFR-Altered Tumors
- Strong alternative if patient has FGFR2/3 mutations or FGFR3 fusions confirmed by FDA-approved testing 3, 6
- Specifically indicated for patients previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy who had disease progression during or after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment 3, 6
Option 3: Single-Agent Chemotherapy
- Paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine if platinum rechallenge not feasible 3, 6
- Gemcitabine/paclitaxel combination if patient has not recently received gemcitabine 6
- Expected response rates: 8-30% depending on agent 6
- Median overall survival: 5-7 months 3, 6
Molecular Testing Requirements
Molecular/genomic testing should be performed early, ideally at diagnosis, to facilitate therapeutic decisions and avoid delays in subsequent lines. 1
Essential Testing
- FGFR3/FGFR2 genetic alterations: Required for eligibility to erdafitinib in later lines 1, 6
- PD-L1 expression: Required if considering monotherapy immunotherapy as first-line 1
Role of Surgery and Radiation in Metastatic Disease
Metastasectomy for Oligometastatic Disease
Metastasectomy may be beneficial for highly selected patients meeting ALL of the following criteria 1:
- No evidence of rapid progression
- Favorable response to preoperative systemic therapy
- Solitary metastatic lesions
Critical pitfall: Do not perform metastasectomy in patients with rapidly progressive disease or multiple metastatic sites 1
Palliative Radiotherapy
- Useful for selected patients with symptomatic metastatic sites 1, 6
- Consider for control of local symptoms, particularly bone metastases or sites causing pain or obstruction 6
- Nephroureterectomy may be offered as palliative treatment to symptomatic patients with resectable locally advanced tumors 3
Special Populations
Poor-Risk Patients
Poor-risk patients are defined as those with 3:
- Poor performance status (ECOG ≥2)
- Visceral disease (liver, lung) or bone metastases
- Abnormal alkaline phosphatase or lactic dehydrogenase levels
These patients show very poor tolerance to multi-agent combination programs and few complete remissions 3. Regimens with lower toxicity profiles are recommended 3.
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder
- Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is recommended despite limited histology-specific data 4
- Expected median overall survival: 9-13 months (markedly lower than 13-15 months for urothelial carcinoma) 4
- Five-year overall survival: less than 5% 4
- Do not postpone platinum-based chemotherapy to use immunotherapy as first-line in cisplatin-eligible patients 4
Clinical Trial Enrollment
Clinical trial enrollment is strongly recommended for all patients, particularly for second-line and subsequent therapies, as data for later-line therapy are highly variable and limited. 3, 6
This recommendation is especially critical for patients with squamous histology given the paucity of histology-specific trials 4.