Management of Full-Thickness Chondral Fissuring of the Knee
For full-thickness chondral fissuring of the knee, microfracture is the recommended first-line surgical treatment for focal, contained lesions smaller than 4 cm² in patients with minimal osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade ≤1). 1
Classification and Diagnostic Framework
Full-thickness chondral fissuring corresponds to Outerbridge Grade 4 lesions, characterized by complete loss of cartilage with exposed subchondral bone. 2 This classification system guides treatment decisions and helps predict outcomes. 1
The natural history of untreated full-thickness cartilage defects typically results in progressive disability and further cartilage loss. 3 Subchondral bone changes occur dynamically after cartilage injury, with bone resorption peaking around 14 days post-injury, followed by sclerotic changes that correlate with increased pain levels. 4
Treatment Algorithm Based on Lesion Characteristics
Lesions <4 cm² with Minimal Osteoarthritis
Microfracture is the indicated procedure, involving the following technical steps: 1
- Debride all friable cartilage using a shaver to remove unstable tissue 2
- Create a perpendicular edge of healthy, well-attached cartilage around the defect using ringed curettes 2
- Penetrate subchondral bone with an awl to create 3-4 mm deep holes spaced 3-4 mm apart 2, 1
- Preserve subchondral bone bridges between holes to maintain structural integrity 2
The mechanism relies on bringing pluripotent marrow cells and growth factors from underlying bone marrow into the defect, which form fibrocartilage to fill the lesion. 2 Studies demonstrate mean 93% ± 17% fill at second-look arthroscopy with macroscopically good-quality cartilage. 1
Lesions 2-6 cm²
- Microfracture remains first-line for acetabular lesions 1
- Mosaicplasty or single-plug osteochondral allograft should be considered for femoral head lesions 1
Lesions >6 cm²
Conversion to total joint arthroplasty should be considered in appropriate surgical candidates, as the defect size exceeds the reliable treatment threshold for cartilage repair techniques. 1
Critical Contraindications
Microfracture must NOT be performed for partial-thickness chondral delamination with an intact basal layer, as the technique requires exposed subchondral bone and is reserved exclusively for contained, full-thickness defects. 1 Attempting microfracture on partial-thickness lesions violates the fundamental principle that subchondral bone must be accessible for marrow cell recruitment.
Non-Surgical Adjuncts
Pain Management
- Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is the preferred first-line oral analgesic, though efficacy is uncertain and likely small 1
- NSAIDs can be used when acetaminophen is insufficient, but long-term use carries gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks 1
- Intra-articular anesthetic and steroid injections serve both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes 5
Bracing and Orthoses
- Patellofemoral braces are conditionally recommended for patients with significant impact on ambulation, joint stability, or pain 1
- Kinesiotaping is conditionally recommended for knee joint involvement 1
- Optimal bracing requires clinician familiarity with various brace types and expertise in fitting 1
Interventions to Avoid
Stem cell injections for cartilage regeneration are NOT recommended due to concerns regarding heterogeneity and lack of standardization, with low-quality supporting evidence. 1
Common Pitfalls and Monitoring
The primary pitfall is attempting microfracture on inappropriate lesions—either those with intact basal cartilage layers or those in patients with advanced osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade >1). 1 The subchondral bone plate must be exposed and intact for the procedure to succeed. 2
Long-term monitoring is essential as chondromalacia may progress to osteoarthritis if not properly managed. 1 Patients with more extensive cartilage damage have less favorable outcomes and may require additional interventions. 5
At second-look arthroscopy, the wave sign (indicating chondral delamination) resolves in approximately 85% of successfully treated cases. 6 Persistent delamination at revision is associated with residual impingement, age ≥58 years, or delayed revision >6 months. 6
The repair tissue formed after microfracture is fibrocartilage rather than native hyaline cartilage, which is less durable and smooth than the original tissue. 7 However, this fibrocartilage can achieve biomechanical properties similar to normal articular cartilage by 12 weeks post-procedure. 8