Calculating Harris-Benedict Basal Metabolic Rate and Total Daily Energy Expenditure
Use the Harris-Benedict equations with the original 1919 formulas to calculate basal metabolic rate (BMR), then multiply by an appropriate activity factor to estimate total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), but recognize that indirect calorimetry is the gold standard when available, especially for patients at extremes of BMI, the elderly, or those with acute/chronic illness. 1
The Harris-Benedict Equations
The original formulas for calculating 24-hour basal metabolic rate are 1:
For men:
- BMR (kcal/day) = 66.4730 + (13.7516 × weight in kg) + (5.0033 × height in cm) - (6.7550 × age in years)
For women:
- BMR (kcal/day) = 655.0955 + (9.5634 × weight in kg) + (1.8496 × height in cm) - (4.6756 × age in years)
These equations were developed for individuals with height from 151 to 200 cm and age from 21 to 70 years. 1
Calculating Total Daily Energy Expenditure
Once you have calculated BMR, multiply by an activity factor to estimate TDEE 1, 2:
- Sedentary/hospitalized patients: Activity factor = 1.1-1.3 1, 3
- Light activity: Activity factor = 1.5 1, 3
- Moderate activity: Activity factor = 1.7 3
- Vigorous activity: Activity factor = 2.0 3
Important caveat: The suggested activity factors of 1.5 for healthy subjects, 1.3 for acute/chronic illness, and 1.1 for critical illness are hypothesized rather than proven and cannot be generally recommended without caution. 1 Total energy expenditure is typically reduced or normal in chronic illnesses, not elevated. 1
When Harris-Benedict Equations Work Best
The Harris-Benedict equations perform most accurately in healthy, normal-weight adults, with accuracy rates of approximately 68.5% in individuals with BMI 25-40 kg/m² and 62.4% in those with BMI >40 kg/m². 1 They remain among the better equations for estimation despite being a century old. 1
Critical Limitations and When to Avoid
The accuracy of Harris-Benedict equations decreases significantly in 1:
- Elderly patients (≥65 years): Consider using simplified weight-based approach of 18-20 kcal/kg/day for resting energy expenditure instead 2
- Severely underweight patients (low BMI): Accuracy drops to only 45% in severely malnourished patients with anorexia nervosa 1
- Patients with obesity (BMI >30 kg/m²): Accuracy decreases, though Harris-Benedict still performs better than many alternatives in this population 1
- Acutely or chronically ill patients: Wide variations occur, with 15-20% underestimation common in cancer patients 1
- Post-bariatric surgery patients: Energy expenditure changes significantly after major weight loss 1
The Gold Standard Alternative
Indirect calorimetry is recommended to evaluate energy requirements when available, as it measures actual oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production rather than estimating from anthropometrics. 1 This is particularly critical for patients at extremes of BMI, those with metabolic alterations, or when initial weight management approaches have failed. 2, 3
However, surveys show that 80% of nutrition staff members lack access to indirect calorimetry, necessitating the use of predictive equations. 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not reduce caloric prescriptions arbitrarily: There is a tendency to prescribe fewer calories than required in patients with obesity when using equations, leading to underfeeding. 1
- Always use actual body weight: Never use ideal or adjusted weight in the calculations, as the equations were developed using actual weight. 3
- Beware of refeeding syndrome: In severely underweight patients with high stress, start with lower caloric intake and gradually increase over 7-10 days, even if calculations suggest higher needs. 2
- Recognize the 10% error margin: Estimations are generally considered accurate only if they fall within a 10% error range compared to indirect calorimetry. 1
- Historical overestimation: Studies have shown the Harris-Benedict equation overestimates basal energy requirements by 10-15% in healthy individuals. 4
Alternative Equations for Specific Populations
When Harris-Benedict is inadequate 1: