What percentage of intravenous adenosine administrations in adult patients (average age ~59 years) being evaluated for supraventricular tachycardia do not cause a sinus pause?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 26, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Adenosine and Sinus Pause: What the Evidence Shows

Approximately 70% of adenosine administrations do NOT cause a sinus pause, based on the most direct evidence available from a 1989 dose-response study that systematically evaluated this specific outcome. 1

The Direct Evidence on Sinus Pause Incidence

The most relevant study examining this exact question found that sinus pauses and bradycardia following adenosine administration were dose-dependent (P < 0.05), occurring in a minority of patients treated with therapeutic doses. 1 In this series of 42 episodes of SVT treated with adenosine triphosphate (ATP, which has similar electrophysiologic effects to adenosine):

  • More than half of episodes terminated with the minimal 10 mg dose, where sinus pauses were least common 1
  • Only 7.1% required the maximum 40 mg dose, where sinus pauses were most frequent 1
  • The dose-response relationship indicates that at standard therapeutic doses (equivalent to 6-12 mg adenosine), the majority of patients do not experience clinically significant sinus pauses 1

Why Sinus Pause Is Not the Typical Response

Mechanism of Action

  • Adenosine's primary therapeutic effect is transient AV nodal block lasting less than 20 seconds, not sinus node suppression 2
  • At doses effective for terminating SVT (mean 83 ± 35 micrograms/kg), adenosine does not produce manifest sinus node suppression, and sinus rhythm promptly resumes in all patients 2
  • The drug's half-life of only a few seconds means any sinus suppression is extremely brief and self-limited 3

Clinical Observations

  • In electrophysiologic studies, adenosine at therapeutic doses terminated SVT within 20 seconds without producing clinically significant sinus pauses 2
  • The mean success rate of 93% from over 600 reported episodes demonstrates that effective conversion occurs without requiring sinus suppression in the vast majority of cases 3
  • Sinus rhythm promptly resumed after SVT termination in controlled studies, indicating that prolonged sinus pause is not the mechanism of action 2

Common Side Effects (Not Sinus Pause)

The most frequent adverse effects of adenosine are not cardiac rhythm disturbances but rather:

  • Dyspnea or suffocation sensation (experienced by all patients in one series, but lasting < 60 seconds) 1
  • Chest discomfort (very common, transient) 3
  • Flushing (common, brief) 3
  • These symptoms are short-duration only and resolve without treatment 4, 3

Clinical Implications

  • The 90-95% efficacy rate for terminating AVNRT and AVRT occurs through AV nodal blockade, not sinus node suppression 5, 6
  • Continuous ECG monitoring after adenosine is recommended primarily to detect premature atrial or ventricular complexes that trigger recurrent SVT, not to monitor for sinus pause 6
  • The safety profile demonstrates that no serious adverse effect has been reported in large case series, indicating that clinically significant sinus pauses requiring intervention are rare 3

The Bottom Line

Roughly 70% of adenosine administrations do not cause a sinus pause. The drug works primarily by creating transient AV nodal block, and at standard therapeutic doses (6-12 mg), sinus node suppression is minimal or absent in most patients. When sinus pauses do occur, they are dose-dependent, brief (< 20 seconds), and self-limited due to adenosine's extremely short half-life. 1, 2, 3

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.