What are the diagnostic criteria for Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The diagnostic criteria for Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) should include a predisposing condition, such as asthma or cystic fibrosis, along with essential components like A. fumigatus-specific IgE ≥0.35 kUA·L−1 and serum total IgE ≥500 IU·mL−1, as well as any two other components, including positive IgG against A. fumigatus, blood eosinophil count ≥500 cells·μL−1, or thin-section chest computed tomography consistent with ABPA 1. The diagnosis of ABPA should be suspected in patients with predisposing conditions or a compatible clinico-radiological presentation, such as expectoration of mucus plugs, fleeting opacities on chest imaging, finger-in-glove opacities, and lung collapse. Key diagnostic criteria include:

  • Predisposing conditions, such as asthma, cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive lung disease, or bronchiectasis
  • Essential components:
    • A. fumigatus-specific IgE ≥0.35 kUA·L−1
    • Serum total IgE ≥500 IU·mL−1
  • Other components (any two):
    • Positive IgG against A. fumigatus
    • Blood eosinophil count ≥500 cells·μL−1
    • Thin-section chest computed tomography consistent with ABPA Important considerations for the diagnosis of ABPA include the presence of high-attenuation mucus, which is pathognomonic of ABPA, and elevated IgE against rAsp f1, f2, and f4, which supports the diagnosis of ABPA 1.

From the Research

Diagnostic Criteria for ABPA

The diagnostic criteria for Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) are based on a combination of clinical, radiological, and immunological findings. The key criteria include:

  • Elevation of total and specific IgE against Aspergillus fumigatus 2
  • Presence of suggestive CT abnormalities such as mucoid impaction and consolidations 2
  • Central bronchiectasis (CB) with normal tapering bronchi, a feature considered pathognomonic of ABPA 3
  • Recurrent wheezing, fleeting pulmonary infiltrates, and bronchiectasis 4

Evolution of Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnostic criteria for ABPA have evolved over time, with various proposals and revisions:

  • Rosenberg criteria (1977) were the first diagnostic criteria for ABPA, but lacked further elaboration on the weighting of diagnostic items and thresholds 4
  • International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) proposed more specific diagnostic criteria in 2013 4
  • Asano et al. proposed the ABPM diagnostic criteria in 2021, which showed superior diagnostic sensitivity compared to Rosenberg and ISHAM criteria 4
  • ISHAM revised the ABPA diagnostic criteria again in 2024 and proposed diagnostic criteria for ABPM 4

Importance of Early Diagnosis

Early diagnosis of ABPA is crucial to prevent late complications such as bronchiectasis and fibrotic lung remodelling 5. Symptoms of ABPA can be highly variable and non-specific, overlapping with those of the underlying primary disease, making it essential to consider ABPA in patients with severe asthma, mould allergic patients with high serum IgE levels, and patients with cystic fibrosis 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

[Evolution of diagnostic criteria for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis].

Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2024

Research

[Allergic bronchopullmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) - an Update].

Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany), 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.