From the Guidelines
Febrile neutropenia should be managed using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Risk-Index Score to stratify risk and guide treatment decisions, with low-risk patients potentially eligible for oral antibiotics and outpatient care, as supported by the 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America 1. The MASCC scoring system assesses various factors, including patient age, history, outpatient or inpatient status, acute clinical signs, medical comorbid conditions, and severity of fever and neutropenia, to identify low-risk patients with a cumulative score >21 points. Key characteristics and their corresponding weights in the MASCC Risk-Index Score include:
- Burden of febrile neutropenia with no or mild symptoms: 5 points
- No hypotension: 5 points
- No chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 4 points
- Solid tumor or hematologic malignancy with no previous fungal infection: 4 points
- No dehydration requiring parenteral fluids: 3 points
- Outpatient status: 3 points
- Age < 60 years: 2 points The use of the MASCC assessment tool has been validated, with a study showing that low-risk patients had a rate of serious medical complications of only 5% 1. Some important considerations in the management of febrile neutropenia include:
- Immediate broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as an antipseudomonal beta-lactam, should be initiated in all patients
- Blood cultures, chest imaging, and other site-specific evaluations should be performed before starting antibiotics if possible
- Vancomycin may be added for suspected catheter-related infection, skin/soft tissue infection, pneumonia, or hemodynamic instability
- Antifungal therapy should be considered if fever persists beyond 4-7 days of antibiotics
- Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors may be used in high-risk patients
- Antibiotics should continue until neutropenia resolves and the patient has been afebrile for at least 48 hours, even if no source is identified.
From the FDA Drug Label
Decrease the incidence of infection‚ as manifested by febrile neutropenia‚ in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anti‑cancer drugs associated with a significant incidence of severe neutropenia with fever Reduce the time to neutrophil recovery and the duration of fever, following induction or consolidation chemotherapy treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Reduce the duration of neutropenia and neutropenia-related clinical sequelae‚ e.g. ‚ febrile neutropenia, in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies undergoing myeloablative chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation (BMT)
The illness script for febrile neutropenia includes:
- Definition: Febrile neutropenia is defined as an ANC < 1,000/mm3 and temperature > 38.2°C.
- Causes: Febrile neutropenia is caused by myelosuppressive anti-cancer drugs, induction or consolidation chemotherapy treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and myeloablative chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation (BMT).
- Symptoms: Symptoms of febrile neutropenia include fever, infections, and oropharyngeal ulcers.
- Treatment: Treatment of febrile neutropenia includes the use of filgrastim to decrease the incidence of infection and reduce the time to neutrophil recovery and the duration of fever. 2 2 2
From the Research
Illness Script for Febrile Neutropenia
The illness script for febrile neutropenia involves the following key components:
- Definition: Febrile neutropenia is a medical condition characterized by fever and a low neutrophil count, typically occurring in patients undergoing chemotherapy or with hematological malignancies 3, 4.
- Diagnosis: Diagnosis is based on the presence of fever and neutropenia, with or without a documented infection 3, 4.
- Treatment: Empirical antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment, with broad-spectrum antibiotics such as cefepime being commonly used 3, 4, 5.
- Management: Management involves prompt administration of antibiotics, usually within one hour of fever onset, and monitoring for response to treatment and potential complications 6.
Key Considerations
Some key considerations in the management of febrile neutropenia include:
- The use of monotherapy versus combination antibiotic therapy, with studies suggesting that monotherapy with cefepime can be effective in many cases 3, 4.
- The role of vancomycin in empirical therapy, with some studies suggesting that it may not be necessary in all cases 7.
- The importance of prompt antibiotic administration, with delays in treatment being associated with increased morbidity and mortality 6.
- The need for individualized treatment approaches, taking into account factors such as the duration of neutropenia and the presence of underlying comorbidities 4, 5.
Treatment Outcomes
Treatment outcomes for febrile neutropenia can vary depending on several factors, including:
- The effectiveness of the antibiotic regimen, with response rates ranging from 55% to 91.7% in different studies 3, 4.
- The presence of complications, such as breakthrough bacteremia or sepsis, which can occur in a subset of patients 4, 5.
- The impact of treatment on patient outcomes, including mortality rates, which can range from 0% to 2.5% in different studies 3, 4.