Which study recommends a 120-minute cut-off point for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The PCI recommended cut-off point of 120 minutes is based on the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention 1. This guideline establishes that the systems goal of performing primary PCI within 90 min of first medical contact when the patient presents to a hospital with PCI capability, and within 120 min when the patient presents to a hospital without PCI capability. The key points to consider are:

  • The guideline emphasizes the importance of timely primary PCI in patients with STEMI, with a focus on minimizing delays to maximize benefits.
  • Several reports have shown excellent outcomes for patients with STEMI undergoing interhospital transfer where first medical contact–to-door balloon time modestly exceeded the systematic goal of 90 minutes 1.
  • The guideline writing committees have modified the first medical contact–to-device time goal from 90 minutes to 120 minutes for interhospital transfer patients, while emphasizing that systems should continue to strive for times ≤ 90 minutes 1. Some of the benefits of primary PCI within this timeframe include:
  • Lower rates for recurrent ischemia, reinfarction, emergency repeat revascularization procedures, intracranial hemorrhage, and death.
  • Early, successful PCI also greatly decreases the complications of STEMI that result from longer ischemic times or unsuccessful fibrinolytic therapy, allowing earlier hospital discharge and resumption of daily activities 1.

From the Research

PCI Recommended Cut Off Point

The PCI recommended cut off point of 120 minutes is based on the study 2.

  • The study found that according to current guidelines for treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be performed within 90 min of first medical contact and total ischemic time should not exceed 120 min.
  • The aim of the study was to analyze compliance with STEMI guidelines in a tertiary PCI center.
  • The study analyzed a prospective single-center registry of 223 consecutive STEMI patients referred for primary PCI between 2003 and 2007.
  • The results showed that median total ischemic time was 4h 30 min (<120 min in 4% of patients), indicating that only a small proportion of patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent primary PCI within the recommended time.

Comparison with Other Studies

Other studies, such as 3, 4, 5, and 6, do not specifically recommend a cut off point of 120 minutes for PCI.

  • Study 3 found that longer door-to-balloon times were associated with higher 1-year mortality in a continuous, nonlinear fashion.
  • Study 4 discussed antithrombotic therapy for patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, but did not mention a specific cut off point for PCI.
  • Study 5 examined relationships between door to balloon time and subsequent admissions due to heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, and mortality for up to 1 year, but did not recommend a cut off point of 120 minutes.
  • Study 6 analyzed annual trends in door-to-balloon times and in-hospital mortality, but found that despite improvements in door-to-balloon times, there was no significant overall change in unadjusted in-hospital mortality or in risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

[Primary PCI in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: mode of referral and time to PCI].

Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.