What is the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) study that recommends a cut-off point of 120 minutes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The PCI recommended cut-off point of 120 minutes is based on the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, which states that interhospital transfer to a PCI-capable hospital is the recommended triage strategy if primary PCI can be performed within 120 minutes of first medical contact (FMC) 1. This guideline is crucial in the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as it emphasizes the importance of timely restoration of coronary blood flow to minimize myocardial tissue death. The 120-minute threshold is supported by an analysis of approximately 19,000 propensity score–matched patients with STEMI, which showed that delays related to transfer for primary PCI exceeding 120 minutes from FMC negated the survival advantage of primary PCI over fibrinolysis 1. Key points to consider in this context include:

  • The importance of minimizing transfer delays to ensure that primary PCI can be performed within the recommended 120-minute time frame 1.
  • The use of fibrinolytic therapy as an alternative reperfusion strategy when primary PCI cannot be performed within the 120-minute window, especially in facilities without PCI capabilities 1.
  • The emphasis on the "time is muscle" concept, which recognizes that shorter door-to-balloon times correlate with improved patient outcomes, reduced mortality, and better preservation of cardiac function following a heart attack 1. While other studies, such as the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, also discuss the importance of timely primary PCI, the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline provides the most recent and highest-quality evidence to support the 120-minute cut-off point 1.

From the Research

PCI Recommended Cut Off Point

The PCI recommended cut off point is related to the door-to-balloon time, which is the time from the patient's arrival at the hospital to the time of balloon inflation in the coronary artery.

  • The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association recommend a door-to-balloon time of 90 minutes or less for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 2.
  • However, the question asks about a 120-minute cut off point, which is not directly mentioned in the provided studies.
  • One study mentions that a door-in to door-out (DIDO) time of 30 minutes or less is recommended to expedite reperfusion care, and the median DIDO time was 68 minutes (interquartile range, 43-120 minutes) 3.
  • This suggests that a DIDO time of 120 minutes or less may be considered acceptable in some cases, but it is not a specific recommended cut off point for PCI.

Studies on PCI Timing

  • A study published in 2009 found that transfer for PCI within 6 hours after fibrinolysis was associated with significantly fewer ischemic complications than standard treatment 4.
  • Another study published in 2011 found that a DIDO time of 30 minutes or less was associated with shorter reperfusion delays and lower in-hospital mortality 3.
  • A study published in 2013 found that median door-to-balloon times declined significantly from 83 minutes to 67 minutes, but in-hospital mortality remained virtually unchanged 2.
  • These studies suggest that timely PCI is important for improving outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction, but the optimal timing and recommended cut off points may vary depending on the specific clinical context.

Related Questions

What is the appropriate thrombolytic treatment for a patient with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) when primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cannot be performed promptly?
When should percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) be performed in a patient with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after receiving fibrinolytic therapy?
Which study recommends a 120-minute cut-off point for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)?
Is routine Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) preferred after successful fibrinolytic therapy?
What are the SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions) guidelines for managing patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)?
What is Urelle (Urinary Tract Analgesic)?
What is the diagnosis for a 66-year-old patient with persistent lumbar pain, despite using analgesics, with a history of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), morning predominant pain, difficulty walking, and changing positions, without any traumatic history?
What are the clinical trials for pediatric infectious diseases?
What is the differential diagnosis and next steps in management for an 81-year-old white female with a past medical history (PMH) of anxiety, insomnia, hyperlipidemia (HLD), osteoporosis, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), prediabetes, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), presenting with intermittent abdominal pain, bloating, and mild tenderness to palpation (TTP) in the right lower quadrant (RLQ) and left lower quadrant (LLQ), following a recent episode of eating fried chicken, with a temperature of 99.5 degrees Fahrenheit, and a history of diverticulitis and diverticula, as well as a recent hiatal hernia surgery in March 2025?
What is the name of the study that recommends a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) cutoff point of 120 minutes?
What does Nystatin (antifungal medication) oral rinse treat?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.