Should denosumab (Prolia) be discontinued upon resolution of osteoporosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Prolia (denosumab) should not be automatically discontinued when osteoporosis appears to resolve, as discontinuation can lead to a rebound effect with rapid bone mineral density loss and increased fracture risk within 12 months of stopping treatment. Discontinuation of Prolia requires careful consideration, and if being considered after achieving good bone density results, patients should transition to an alternative osteoporosis medication, typically a bisphosphonate like alendronate, to maintain bone protection 1. This transition should occur at the time the next Prolia dose would be due. The decision to discontinue should be made by a healthcare provider based on individual fracture risk assessment, duration of treatment (typically at least 5-10 years), and bone mineral density measurements.

Some key points to consider when deciding whether to discontinue Prolia include:

  • The risk of rebound increased bone turnover and associated vertebral fracture risk after stopping denosumab 1
  • The potential benefits of long-term continuation of Prolia for patients with high fracture risk, with periodic reassessment of benefits versus risks
  • The importance of transitioning to an alternative osteoporosis medication, such as a bisphosphonate, to maintain bone protection if discontinuation is being considered

According to the European Calcified Tissue Society, a re-evaluation should be carried out after 5 years of denosumab treatment, and bisphosphonate therapy should be considered to reduce or prevent the rebound increase in bone turnover 1. However, as the optimal bisphosphonate regimen post-denosumab is currently unknown, continuation of denosumab can also be considered until results from ongoing trials become available.

In terms of specific bisphosphonates, there is good evidence of benefit from treatment with several oral bisphosphonates, including alendronate (70 mg once per week), risedronate (35 mg once per week), and ibandronate (150 mg once per month) 1. These treatments prevent bone loss and decrease bone turnover, but the challenge is to maintain good adherence due to potential GI adverse effects.

Ultimately, the decision to discontinue Prolia should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the individual patient's fracture risk, treatment duration, and bone mineral density measurements, as well as the potential risks and benefits of continued treatment versus transition to an alternative osteoporosis medication.

From the FDA Drug Label

Following discontinuation of Prolia treatment, fracture risk increases, including the risk of multiple vertebral fractures Treatment with Prolia results in significant suppression of bone turnover and cessation of Prolia treatment results in increased bone turnover above pretreatment values 9 months after the last dose of Prolia. Bone turnover then returns to pretreatment values 24 months after the last dose of Prolia In addition, bone mineral density (BMD) returns to pretreatment values within 18 months after the last injection New vertebral fractures occurred as early as 7 months (on average 19 months) after the last dose of Prolia. Prior vertebral fracture was a predictor of multiple vertebral fractures after Prolia discontinuation. Evaluate an individual's benefit-risk before initiating treatment with Prolia If Prolia treatment is discontinued, patients should be transitioned to an alternative antiresorptive therapy

The decision to discontinue Prolia in patients with resolved osteoporosis should be based on an individual benefit-risk assessment.

  • Key considerations include the increased risk of fractures after discontinuation of Prolia treatment, particularly multiple vertebral fractures.
  • Patients should be transitioned to an alternative antiresorptive therapy if Prolia treatment is discontinued 2.
  • The benefit-risk profile should be evaluated for each patient before making a decision to discontinue Prolia 2.

From the Research

Discontinuation of Prolia with Osteoporosis Resolution

  • The decision to discontinue Prolia (denosumab) in patients with resolved osteoporosis should be based on individual patient factors and risk assessment 3.
  • Studies suggest that discontinuation of bisphosphonates, another class of osteoporosis medications, can be considered in many patients, although high-risk patients may benefit from continued therapy 4, 5.
  • Denosumab, however, has a pronounced loss of anti-resorptive effect after discontinuation, which can result in rebound vertebral fractures 6.
  • There is limited data on the optimal duration of Prolia treatment and the effects of discontinuation, but sequential treatment regimens are being explored to minimize long-term safety issues 7.
  • Clinicians should consider the individual patient's risk factors, bone density, and fracture history when deciding whether to discontinue Prolia or switch to another treatment 4, 6, 7.
  • It is essential to weigh the benefits and risks of continued treatment with Prolia, considering the potential for atypical femoral fractures and other long-term safety issues 6, 7.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Osteoporosis treatment: an evidence-based approach.

Journal of gerontological nursing, 2011

Research

Osteoporosis: how long should we treat?

Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity, 2008

Research

Bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America, 2012

Research

Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults.

Lancet (London, England), 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.