What is the diagnosis based on the findings of clear sinuses, no mucosal thickening, and intact cranial fossa walls?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The patient's sinus X-ray shows no evidence of mucosal sinus disease, and therefore, no treatment for sinusitis is warranted based on these findings. The sinuses are aerated and clear with no mucosal thickening, no soft tissue masses, and no air-fluid levels, which is consistent with the guidelines for diagnosing acute sinusitis 1. According to the clinical practice guideline for adult sinusitis, radiographic imaging of the paranasal sinuses is unnecessary for diagnosis in patients who already meet clinical diagnostic criteria for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) 1.

The key findings from the X-ray include:

  • The sinuses are properly air-filled with no fluid
  • No mucosal thickening
  • No masses
  • The sinus walls are intact
  • No significant deviation of the nasal septum or enlargement of adenoid tissue
  • The fourth portion of the anterior cranial fossa appears intact on the lateral view

However, for a more detailed assessment of the cribriform plate, additional imaging such as CT or MRI would be more appropriate as X-rays have limitations in visualizing this delicate structure 1. The American College of Radiology (ACR) has stated that plain films of the sinuses are inaccurate in a high percentage of patients and should be supplanted by CT imaging 1.

Given the normal findings on the X-ray, any symptoms the patient may be experiencing are not explained by sinus disease according to this imaging study. It is essential to consider other potential causes of the patient's symptoms and to evaluate them accordingly. The patient's symptoms should be reassessed, and a thorough medical history should be taken to determine the underlying cause of their symptoms.

From the Research

Findings and Impressions

  • The sinuses are aerated and clear with no mucosal thickening, no soft tissue masses, and no air-fluid levels.
  • The walls of the sinuses are intact, and on the lateral view, the fourth of the anterior cranial fossa appears intact.
  • No significant nasal septal deviation or adenoidal enlargement is observed.
  • The impression is that there is no mucosal sinus disease demonstrated, and the assessment of the cribriform plate is better.

Comparison with Existing Studies

  • There are no direct studies available for comparison with the given findings.
  • However, studies such as 2 discuss the effects of treatments in people with clinically diagnosed acute sinusitis, which may be relevant in understanding the absence of mucosal sinus disease in this case.

Relevance of Other Studies

  • Studies like 3 focus on the experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment, which may not be directly relevant to this specific case.
  • Other studies, such as 4 and 5, discuss the importance of surveillance and monitoring in patient care, as well as the assessment of vital signs, which may be relevant in a broader clinical context but not specifically to the given findings.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Sinusitis (acute).

BMJ clinical evidence, 2011

Research

Improving Patient Safety through the Use of Nursing Surveillance.

Biomedical instrumentation & technology, 2017

Research

The global elements of vital signs' assessment: a guide for clinical practice.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.