What is the best therapy for a patient with acute anterior STEMI, no cardiogenic shock, and no contraindications to fibrinolysis, with a 2-hour transfer time to a PCI-capable hospital?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The best therapy for this 76-year-old man with an acute anterior STEMI is to administer fibrinolysis and then transfer immediately for PCI, with the plan to take him to the cath lab even if he successfully reperfuses within 24 hours. This approach is supported by the most recent guidelines, including the 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation 1. The patient's presentation within 2 hours of symptom onset makes him an excellent candidate for fibrinolytic therapy, and the lack of contraindications to fibrinolysis further supports this approach. Key points to consider in this decision include:

  • The importance of prompt reperfusion therapy in STEMI patients, with a goal of restoring coronary flow as quickly as possible 1
  • The role of fibrinolysis in STEMI patients who cannot undergo primary PCI within the recommended timeframe, with the goal of improving outcomes by reducing the time to reperfusion 1
  • The benefits of a pharmacoinvasive strategy, which combines the immediate benefits of fibrinolysis with the definitive treatment of PCI, in improving outcomes and reducing the risk of recurrent ischemia 1 Some of the key evidence supporting this approach includes:
  • The 2017 ESC guidelines, which recommend immediate transfer to a PCI-capable center following fibrinolysis, with the goal of performing PCI within 24 hours 1
  • The TRANSFER-AMI study, which demonstrated improved outcomes with a pharmacoinvasive strategy in high-risk STEMI patients 1
  • The CARESS-in-AMI trial, which showed that immediate transfer for PCI after fibrinolytic therapy improved outcomes in high-risk STEMI patients 1

From the FDA Drug Label

The Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ASSENT 4 PCI) was a phase IIIb/IV study designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a strategy of administering full dose TNKase with a single bolus of 4000 U of unfractionated heparin in patients with STEMI, in whom primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was planned, but in whom a delay of 1-3 hours was anticipated before PCI The incidence of the 90-day primary endpoint, a composite of death or cardiogenic shock or congestive heart failure (CHF) within 90 days, was 18.6% in patients treated with TNKase plus PCI versus 13.4% in those treated with PCI alone (p = 0.0045; RR 1.39 (95% CI 1.11–1. 74)).

The best therapy is Transfer for primary PCI 2.

From the Research

Best Therapy for Acute Anterior STEMI

The best therapy for a 76-year-old man presenting with an acute anterior STEMI, symptom onset 2 hours ago, and no contraindications to fibrinolysis, is:

  • Administer fibrinolysis, transfer now, take to cath lab even if successfully re-perfuses within 24 hours 3, 4 This approach is supported by the guidelines that recommend fibrinolysis when the anticipated time for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) exceeds two hours 4.

Rationale

The rationale for this approach is based on the following points:

  • Fibrinolysis is a recommended treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) when PCI is not available within two hours 3, 4
  • Prehospital administration of fibrinolysis may improve outcomes and decrease mortality rate in AMI patients 4
  • The combination of fibrinolysis and subsequent PCI, even if the patient has successfully re-perfused, is a recommended approach to ensure optimal outcomes 3, 4

Comparison of Fibrinolytic Agents

Studies have compared the outcomes of different fibrinolytic agents, such as streptokinase and tenecteplase, in STEMI reperfusion therapy 5. However, the choice of fibrinolytic agent is not the primary consideration in this scenario, as the focus is on the timing and approach to reperfusion therapy rather than the specific agent used.

Related Questions

What are the timing criteria for administering intravenous fibrinolytics (e.g. alteplase, tenecteplase, streptokinase) to a patient with ongoing chest pain and no immediate access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)?
What is the recommended approach to using intrapleural (within the pleural space) lytics, such as alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator, tPA), in patients at risk of bleeding, considering the results of the MIST2 (Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial 2) trial on intrapleural lytics bleeding rate?
What are the guidelines for antiplatelet and fibrinolytic (thrombolytic) therapy in a 62-year-old man presenting with sudden onset of aphasia (difficulty speaking) and left-sided weakness, who meets initial criteria for fibrinolytic therapy and is undergoing a computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain?
What is the most appropriate reperfusion strategy for a patient with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presenting with elevated troponin I and ST elevations on electrocardiogram (ECG), located at a critical access hospital far from a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) site?
What are the considerations for fibrinolytic therapy in an elderly male with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) and ongoing chest pain 24 hours post-onset, where Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is not available?
What is the recommended antibiotic regimen for a 45-year-old female with a puncture wound (from a fishhook injury)?
What are the effects of nicotine pouches (Nicotine Replacement Therapy - NRT)?
What is the clinical significance of a normal tricuspid valve structure with respiratory variation greater than 50% (Resp >50%), tricuspid regurgitation (TR) gradient variation, no stenosis, inferior vena cava (IVC) calibre of 1.3 centimeters, trivial regurgitant right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), normal right atrial (RA) pressure, and a tricuspid regurgitation velocity of 1.2 meters per second?
What are the injuries associated with nicotine (Nicotine) vaping?
What are the causes of unilateral lower limb edema with scrotal swelling?
What does abdominal cramping during sexual intercourse signify?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.