Is a tampon (intravaginal absorbent device) visible on medical imaging?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Tampons can be visible on imaging modalities, including ultrasound, as they typically appear as hyperechoic structures within the vagina, often creating acoustic shadowing. When it comes to imaging the female reproductive system, particularly the cervix, transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is the preferred method due to its high reproducibility and ability to provide complete visualization of the cervix 1.

In the context of assessing the gravid cervix, TVUS allows for the measurement of cervical length (CL), which is a significant predictor of spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) 1. However, the visibility of tampons on TVUS is not explicitly mentioned in the provided evidence.

Considering the principles of ultrasound imaging, it is reasonable to assume that tampons would be visible on TVUS as hyperechoic structures, similar to their appearance on other ultrasound modalities. This is because tampons are typically made of absorbent materials that would reflect sound waves and appear bright on ultrasound images.

Key points to consider when interpreting pelvic imaging include:

  • Asking patients about tampon use before undergoing pelvic imaging to help radiologists accurately interpret findings
  • Being aware of the potential for tampons to be mistaken for pathological conditions or foreign bodies
  • Using TVUS as the preferred method for assessing the gravid cervix due to its high reproducibility and ability to provide complete visualization of the cervix 1.

Overall, while the provided evidence does not directly address the visibility of tampons on TVUS, it is likely that tampons would be visible as hyperechoic structures on ultrasound imaging, and clinicians should be aware of this when interpreting pelvic imaging results.

From the Research

Imaging of Tampons

  • There is no direct evidence in the provided studies that discusses the visibility of tampons on imaging 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • The studies primarily focus on toxic shock syndrome, tampon loss, and the regulation of intravaginal medical devices, but do not address the visibility of tampons on imaging modalities such as X-rays, CT scans, or ultrasounds.
  • However, it can be inferred that if a tampon is lost or retained, imaging studies may be used to locate it, but the provided evidence does not specifically mention the visibility of tampons on imaging 4.

Tampon Loss and Retrieval

  • A study on tampon loss found that in 25% of cases, a lost tampon was found on physical examination, suggesting that imaging may not always be necessary for retrieval 4.
  • The same study highlights the importance of thorough examination of adolescents presenting with tampon loss, as the lost tampon was found in a higher rate among adolescents compared to older women 4.

Regulation of Intravaginal Medical Devices

  • The US FDA regulates menstrual tampons and vaginal pessaries as medical devices, subject to premarket and postmarket regulatory controls 6.
  • However, this information does not provide insight into the visibility of tampons on imaging modalities.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

[Toxic shock syndrome].

Harefuah, 1997

Research

[Toxic shock syndrome].

Ugeskrift for laeger, 2021

Research

Tampon loss - management among adolescents and adult women.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2021

Research

[Toxic shock syndrome].

Ugeskrift for laeger, 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.