Is hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone (Flu Cortizone) more effective than hydrocortisone alone in patients with septic shock?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Hydrocortisone alone is the recommended treatment for septic shock, not hydrocortisone with fludrocortisone (which I assume is what "flu Cortizone" refers to). For patients with septic shock, intravenous hydrocortisone at a dose of 200-300 mg per day, typically divided into 3-4 doses or given as a continuous infusion for 5-7 days or until vasopressor support is no longer needed, is the standard approach. Adding fludrocortisone to hydrocortisone does not provide additional benefit in most septic shock cases and is not routinely recommended. The rationale is that hydrocortisone alone at these doses provides sufficient glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid effects to help restore vascular tone, increase blood pressure, and potentially improve responsiveness to vasopressors in septic shock. While some older studies suggested a potential benefit of combination therapy, more recent evidence indicates that hydrocortisone monotherapy is equally effective and simpler to administer, as suggested by the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in critically ill patients 1.

Some key points to consider when treating septic shock with hydrocortisone include:

  • The dose of hydrocortisone should be less than 400 mg per day, as higher doses do not provide additional benefits and may increase the risk of adverse effects 1
  • Hydrocortisone should be administered for at least 3 days at the full dose, or longer in adult patients with septic shock that is not responsive to fluid and moderate to high-dose vasopressor therapy 1
  • The use of fludrocortisone in combination with hydrocortisone is not recommended, as it does not provide additional benefits and may increase the risk of adverse effects 1
  • Treatment should be initiated early in patients with septic shock who remain hypotensive despite adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy, as suggested by the surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016 1.

Overall, the current evidence suggests that hydrocortisone alone is the preferred treatment for septic shock, and that combination therapy with fludrocortisone is not necessary.

From the Research

Comparison of Hydrocortisone and Fludrocortisone vs Hydrocortisone Alone

  • The use of hydrocortisone in adult patients with septic shock is controversial, and the effectiveness of adding fludrocortisone to hydrocortisone remains uncertain 2.
  • A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found that fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality at last follow-up than hydrocortisone alone (RR, 0.88; 95% CrI, 0.74-1.03; 94.2% probability of superiority, moderate-certainty evidence) 2.
  • Another study found that the 28-day mortality rate was reduced after dual corticosteroid treatment with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone (risk ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.78-0.99) 3.
  • However, a retrospective observational study found that patients who received hydrocortisone had higher hospital mortality (52% vs 38%; P < .01) compared to those who did not receive hydrocortisone, although the study noted that patients who received hydrocortisone were more severely ill than those who did not 4.

Efficacy of Hydrocortisone Therapy

  • A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found that hydrocortisone did not improve survival or reversal of shock in patients with septic shock, either overall or in patients who did not have a response to corticotropin, although hydrocortisone hastened reversal of shock in patients in whom shock was reversed 5.
  • The use of stress dose corticosteroids, specifically hydrocortisone, in septic shock is heterogeneous, and current clinical trials yield conflicting results 4.

Clinical Utilization of Corticosteroids

  • The care of patients with worsening septic shock involves multiple treatment decisions involving vasopressor choices and adjunctive treatments, including corticosteroids 6.
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis found that patients who underwent dual corticosteroid treatment with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone had lower long-term mortality rates and higher rate of shock reversal after 28 days compared to control patients 3.

Related Questions

What is the beneficial dose of fludrocortisone in the management of septic shock?
What is the most important medication to administer to a 30-year-old female patient with a history of ulcerative colitis (UC) and adrenal disease, currently experiencing septic shock, hypotension, hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, hyperkalemia, acute renal injury, non-anion gap metabolic acidosis, and eosinophilia, who is taking cortisone treatment?
How to taper off hydrocortisone (cortisol replacement therapy)?
What are the criteria for a definitive diagnosis of septic shock?
What is the role of corticosteroids (specifically hydrocortisone) in the treatment of hypothermia?
What are the preoperative clearance considerations for a 79-year-old patient undergoing cataract surgery with a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia, currently on amlodipine, metoprolol, valsartan, and Paxil (paroxetine), and aspirin, following a recent carotid artery endarterectomy?
Does cannabis (marijuana) smoking increase the risk of pulmonary carcinoma (lung cancer)?
Should aspirin be held preoperatively in a 79-year-old patient with cataract surgery, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia, taking amlodipine, metoprolol, valsartan, and Paxil (paroxetine), with a recent history of carotid artery endarterectomy?
Should aspirin be held preoperatively in a 79-year-old patient with cataract surgery, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia, taking amlodipine, metoprolol, valsartan, and Paxil (paroxetine), with a recent history of carotid artery endarterectomy?
Should penicillin (antibiotic) medication be discontinued in the event of a drug eruption?
What is the recommended frequency for taking a sitz bath (sitz bath) for external hemorrhoids (external piles)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.