What are negative prognostic findings on a computed tomography (CT) scan in a patient with asphyxia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Negative prognostic findings on a CT scan in a patient with asphyxia include reduced gray-white matter ratio (GWR) at the level of the basal ganglia and global cerebral edema, which predict poor outcome with a false positive rate (FPR) of 0%. These findings are based on the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care 1. The reduced GWR at the level of the basal ganglia on brain CT predicted poor outcome, with FPR ranging from 0% to 8%, while global cerebral edema on brain CT at a median of 1 day after cardiac arrest also predicted poor outcome (FPR, 0%; 95% CI, 0%–5%) 1.

Some key points to consider when evaluating CT scans in patients with asphyxia include:

  • Reduced GWR at the level of the basal ganglia
  • Global cerebral edema
  • Diffuse brain swelling on CT at 72 hours after cardiac arrest
  • GWR between the caudate nucleus and the posterior limb of internal capsule below 1.22 within 24 hours or below 1.18 within 48 hours after cardiac arrest

It is essential to note that these findings should be considered in the context of the patient's overall clinical status and other prognostic indicators, such as neurological examination, electroencephalography, and biomarkers 1. Early CT findings may be subtle, so serial imaging and correlation with clinical status are crucial for comprehensive prognostication after asphyxial injury.

From the Research

Negative Prognostic Findings on CT Scan in Asphyxia

  • Cerebral edema on arrival computed tomographic (CT) scan is a negative prognostic finding in patients resuscitated after asphyxiation, as seen in a study where four out of five non-survivors showed cerebral edema already on arrival CT scan, while none of the nine survivors did 2.
  • Middle cerebral artery hyperdensity, sulcal effacement, liquoral space asymmetry, and hypodensity of grey matter are early signs of ischemic cerebral infarction that can be detected by noncontrast CT scan, and their presence can indicate a poor prognosis 3.
  • Extraparenchymal bleeding and cerebral edema are significant independent prognostic findings on CT scan in the subacute phase of ischemic stroke, and are associated with an unfavorable outcome 4.
  • CT evaluation of mild brain injury induced by asphyxia or intrauterine fetal distress is not of any value, and the role of CT evaluation on the grade of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is uncertain and doubtful 5.

Specific CT Scan Findings

  • Cerebral edema: indicates a poor prognosis in patients resuscitated after asphyxiation 2.
  • Extraparenchymal bleeding: associated with an unfavorable outcome in ischemic stroke patients 4.
  • Middle cerebral artery hyperdensity: an early sign of ischemic cerebral infarction, indicating a poor prognosis 3.
  • Sulcal effacement: an early sign of ischemic cerebral infarction, indicating a poor prognosis 3.
  • Hypodensity of grey matter: an early sign of ischemic cerebral infarction, indicating a poor prognosis 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

[Role of cerebral computed tomography in the evaluation of brain injury following hypoxia in neonates].

Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics, 2006

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.