What is consistent with a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) in a patient with suspected pulmonary hypertension?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

A diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is consistent with a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mmHg at rest, a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of less than 15 mmHg, and the absence of other causes of pulmonary hypertension, such as pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. This diagnosis is supported by the most recent guidelines, including the 2022 update from the American College of Radiology 1. According to these guidelines, pulmonary hypertension is defined as a mean pulmonary arterial pressure greater than 20 mmHg at rest, and IPAH is characterized by a pulmonary artery wedge pressure of less than 15 mmHg and a pulmonary vascular resistance of greater than 3 Wood units.

Key characteristics of IPAH include:

  • Mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mmHg at rest
  • Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure less than 15 mmHg
  • Pulmonary vascular resistance greater than 3 Wood units
  • Absence of other causes of pulmonary hypertension, such as left heart disease, lung disease, chronic thromboembolic disease, and secondary causes like connective tissue disorders, HIV infection, portal hypertension, congenital heart disease, and drug-induced pulmonary hypertension

The diagnosis of IPAH requires a comprehensive evaluation, including right heart catheterization, echocardiography, and other diagnostic tests to exclude other causes of pulmonary hypertension. The American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for sickle cell disease also support this definition, noting that a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mmHg, a pulmonary artery wedge pressure of less than 15 mmHg, and a pulmonary vascular resistance of greater than 3 Wood units are consistent with a diagnosis of PAH 1.

In the context of the patient's presentation, option A (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of less than 15 mmHg and absence of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease) is the most consistent with a diagnosis of IPAH. The patient's symptoms, including worsening dyspnea on exertion, and the findings on electrocardiogram and transthoracic echocardiogram, are also consistent with this diagnosis. Therefore, option A is the correct answer, as it aligns with the diagnostic criteria for IPAH as defined by the most recent guidelines 1.

From the Research

Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

To diagnose idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), several factors must be considered, including pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), and the absence of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease.

  • The diagnosis of IPAH is characterized by a PCWP of ≤15 mm Hg, indicating a normal left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) 2.
  • A mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of ≥25 mmHg at rest is also a key criterion for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension, with IPAH being a subset of this condition 3.
  • The absence of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease is crucial for the diagnosis of IPAH, as this condition involves obstruction of the small pulmonary veins and is distinct from IPAH 4.

Consistent Findings with IPAH Diagnosis

Given these criteria, the option that would be consistent with a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension is:

  • A pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of less than 15 mm Hg and the absence of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, which aligns with the definition of pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension and specifically IPAH 2, 3.

Inconsistent Options

Options that do not align with the diagnosis of IPAH include:

  • A pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of greater than 15 mm Hg, which suggests post-capillary pulmonary hypertension rather than IPAH 5.
  • A mean pulmonary arterial pressure of less than 20 mm Hg at rest, which does not meet the criteria for pulmonary hypertension 3.
  • The presence of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, which is a distinct condition from IPAH 4.

References

Related Questions

In older women with hypertension, obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or atrial fibrillation, can heart‑failure with preserved ejection fraction and a normal left‑ventricular end‑diastolic pressure cause an elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during right‑heart catheterization for suspected Group 2 pulmonary hypertension?
What is the normal Pulmonary Capillary Wedge (PCW) pressure for a geriatric patient with possible dementia at risk of fluid overload?
Could a patient's history of autoimmune diseases, such as systemic sclerosis, be contributing to their symptoms of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD)?
What are the diagnostic findings on right heart catheterization (RHC) for idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (IPH)?
What is the management approach for a patient with absence of respiratory variation in Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP) and Left Ventricular (LV) diastolic pressure gradient?
What is the recommended protocol for transitioning from Olanzapine (olanzapine) to Abilify (aripiprazole) in bipolar disorder?
Can Covid-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) cause gastrointestinal symptoms?
What is the recommended dosage when starting a new medication?
Is ionic calcium preferred for determining calcium values in blood?
What is the best next step in managing a patient with suspected ascending cholangitis, presenting with jaundice, fever, right upper quadrant abdominal pain, and biliary ductal dilatation?
Is neutropenic fever an indication for hospitalization?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.