Prognosis of Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Gastric adenocarcinoma generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, with an overall 5-year survival rate of approximately 26% after resection. 1
Prognostic Factors
Stage at Diagnosis
The stage of disease at diagnosis is the most significant determinant of prognosis:
Early Gastric Cancer (EGC):
- Limited to mucosa or submucosa (T1)
- 5-year survival >90% when appropriately treated 1
- Excellent prognosis when meeting criteria for endoscopic resection
Locally Advanced Disease:
- Stage II-III: 5-year survival rates range from 20-50% depending on exact stage
- Perioperative chemotherapy can improve 5-year survival from 23% to 36.3% 1
Metastatic Disease:
Resection Status
Complete surgical resection (R0) significantly improves prognosis:
- 5-year survival after R0 resection: 33% 4
- Incomplete resection (R1/R2): Significantly worse outcomes
Histological Factors
- Lauren Classification:
Patient-Related Factors
- Age: Younger patients (<45 years) may have better long-term survival after curative resection despite often presenting with more aggressive disease 6
- Nutritional Status: BMI below 20 is an independent poor prognostic factor 7
- Performance Status: Better performance status correlates with improved outcomes
- Serum Albumin Levels: Low levels associated with worse prognosis 7
Treatment Impact on Prognosis
Surgical Intervention
- Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for localized disease
- No surgical treatment or only palliative surgery (vs. radical surgery) are statistically significant poor prognostic factors 7
- Extent of lymphadenectomy remains debated, but adequate lymph node retrieval (minimum of 14, optimally 25) is recommended 1
Multimodal Therapy
Perioperative Chemotherapy:
- Improves 5-year survival from 23% to 36.3% in locally advanced disease 1
- ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-FU) or modifications are commonly used regimens
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy:
- Can improve 5-year overall survival by approximately 15% in certain populations 1
Targeted Therapies:
Common Pitfalls in Prognostication
Failure to adequately stage disease: Complete staging with endoscopy, CT, and potentially EUS and diagnostic laparoscopy is essential for accurate prognostication
Not accounting for molecular subtypes: HER2 status, MSI status, and PD-L1 expression significantly affect treatment options and outcomes
Overlooking the importance of complete (R0) resection: This is a critical determinant of long-term survival
Not considering patient-specific factors: Nutritional status, performance status, and comorbidities significantly impact prognosis
Geographic variations in outcomes: Survival rates for gastric cancer are generally higher in Eastern compared to Western populations, possibly due to earlier detection through screening programs and differences in tumor biology 4
In conclusion, while gastric adenocarcinoma generally has a poor prognosis when diagnosed at advanced stages, early detection and appropriate multimodal therapy can significantly improve outcomes. The integration of molecular profiling and targeted therapies offers new hope for improving survival in this challenging disease.