What is the most effective method to decrease the zone of stasis in a patient with an electrical injury?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Controlling Temperature is Most Effective for Decreasing the Zone of Stasis in Electrical Burns

Controlling temperature by cooling thermal burns with cold (15° to 25°C) tap water as soon as possible is the most effective method to decrease the zone of stasis in a patient with an electrical injury. 1

Understanding Zones of Injury in Electrical Burns

Electrical burns create three distinct zones of tissue damage:

  • Zone of coagulation: central area with complete cell death
  • Zone of stasis: surrounding area with compromised blood flow but initially viable cells
  • Zone of hyperemia: outermost area with increased blood flow

The zone of stasis is critical because it can either recover or progress to necrosis within 24-48 hours after injury, depending on treatment.

Evidence-Based Management to Reduce Zone of Stasis

Temperature Control (Most Effective)

  • Cool thermal burns with cold (15° to 25°C) tap water as soon as possible 1
  • Continue cooling until pain is relieved
  • Cooling reduces:
    • Pain
    • Edema
    • Depth of injury
    • Need for excision and grafting

Important Cautions

  • Do not apply ice directly to a burn; it can produce tissue ischemia 1
  • Avoid prolonged cold exposure to small burns or brief exposure to large burns as this can cause further tissue injury and hypothermia 1

Other Interventions with Supporting Evidence

Recent research has shown several promising approaches for decreasing the zone of stasis:

  1. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC): A 2018 study demonstrated that oral NAC significantly decreased tissue destruction in electrical burns by reducing the necrotic area and serum creatine kinase levels 2

  2. Subatmospheric Pressure (Vacuum-Assisted Closure): Application of controlled negative pressure (125 mmHg) within 12 hours of injury significantly decreased the maximum depth of cellular death in partial-thickness burns 3

  3. Glutathione: Systemic administration has shown effectiveness in saving the zone of stasis by increasing cellular thermo-resistance 4

Clinical Approach to Electrical Burns

  1. First ensure safety by turning off the power source 1

  2. Assess the victim for:

    • Entry and exit points of current
    • Thermal burns from burning clothing
    • Need for CPR or defibrillation
    • Signs of shock
  3. Apply appropriate temperature control:

    • Cool burns with cold tap water (15-25°C)
    • Avoid ice application
    • Monitor for hypothermia
  4. All electrical burn victims require medical assessment as the extent of injury may not be apparent 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Using ice directly on burns (causes tissue ischemia)
  • Delaying cooling (reduces effectiveness)
  • Underestimating the extent of internal damage in electrical injuries
  • Failing to recognize that electrical burns often cause more severe tissue damage than is apparent on the surface
  • Not monitoring for cardiac arrhythmias, which can occur with electrical injuries

Temperature control through appropriate cooling remains the most evidence-based intervention for decreasing the zone of stasis in electrical burns, with promising adjunctive therapies emerging in recent research.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The effect of oral N-acetylcystein on prevention of extensive tissue destruction in electrical burn injury.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2018

Research

Saving the zone of stasis: is glutathione effective?

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.