What is the cul de sac (pouch of Douglas) on vaginal examination?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The Cul-de-sac (Pouch of Douglas) on Vaginal Examination

The cul-de-sac (pouch of Douglas) is a peritoneal recess located between the rectum posteriorly and the uterus and upper vagina anteriorly, which may contain a small to moderate amount of fluid in healthy females depending on their menstrual cycle phase. 1

Anatomical Definition and Clinical Significance

The cul-de-sac represents the most dependent portion of the peritoneal cavity in both standing and supine positions, making it a common location for:

  • Collection of physiologic fluid
  • Accumulation of pathologic fluid (blood, pus)
  • Seeding of metastatic disease
  • Development of endometriosis
  • Herniation of pelvic contents

Assessment During Vaginal Examination

During vaginal examination, the cul-de-sac can be palpated through the posterior fornix of the vagina. Key findings to note include:

  • Presence and amount of fluid
  • Tenderness or nodularity
  • Masses or fullness
  • Mobility of surrounding structures

Clinical Implications

Normal Findings

  • Small to moderate amount of fluid may be physiologic depending on menstrual cycle 1
  • Non-tender
  • No masses or nodularity

Pathological Findings

  1. Large amounts of fluid:

    • May indicate pathology but not always 1
    • When ectopic pregnancy is suspected, significant fluid raises concern for rupture 1
  2. Echogenic fluid:

    • May represent blood or pus 1
  3. Masses or nodularity:

    • May indicate endometriosis, which typically presents as hypoechoic, solid, noncompressible masses 2
    • Could represent metastatic disease, especially in dependent position 3
    • Pelvic organ prolapse may involve herniation into the rectovaginal space 1
  4. Cul-de-sac hernias:

    • May contain peritoneal fat (peritoneocele), small bowel (enterocele), or sigmoid colon (sigmoidocele) 1
    • Can present clinically with posterior vaginal bulge 1

Diagnostic Procedures

Culdocentesis

  • Procedure to obtain free fluid from the cul-de-sac
  • Main indications include suspected ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory disease 4
  • Provides immediate critical information for patient management

Imaging Assessment

Several imaging modalities can evaluate the cul-de-sac:

  1. Ultrasound:

    • Transvaginal approach provides excellent visualization
    • Can detect fluid, masses, and endometriotic lesions 2
    • Transperineal ultrasound can demonstrate cul-de-sac herniation 1
  2. MRI and CT:

    • Better for detailed assessment of complex masses
    • Can differentiate contents of cul-de-sac hernias 1
  3. Dynamic Cystocolpoproctography:

    • Useful for evaluating pelvic organ prolapse involving the cul-de-sac 1

Clinical Pitfalls and Caveats

  • A normal amount of fluid in the cul-de-sac varies by menstrual cycle phase and should not be automatically considered pathologic
  • Posterior vaginal bulge may represent either cul-de-sac hernias or anterior rectoceles, which require different management approaches 1
  • Endometriosis in the cul-de-sac often presents with atypical, non-cyclic symptoms that may be misleading 2
  • When assessing for pelvic organ prolapse, clinical examination alone may miss up to 65% of enteroceles that can be detected by imaging 1

The cul-de-sac examination provides valuable diagnostic information about the pelvic cavity and should be a routine part of comprehensive gynecological assessment.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Radiological detection and diagnosis of pouch of Douglas lesions.

Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging, 1988

Research

Culdocentesis.

The Journal of family practice, 1981

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.