What carotid arterial systolic velocity on ultrasound indicates stenosis of 70% or greater?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Carotid Arterial Systolic Velocity Thresholds for Stenosis ≥70%

A peak systolic velocity (PSV) of >230 cm/s in the internal carotid artery indicates stenosis of 70% or greater. 1

Primary Diagnostic Criteria for ≥70% Carotid Stenosis

According to the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines, the following ultrasound parameters indicate stenosis of 70% or greater:

  1. Primary criterion:

    • Peak systolic velocity (PSV) >230 cm/s 1
  2. Supporting criteria:

    • End-diastolic velocity (EDV) >100 cm/s 1
    • Internal carotid artery to common carotid artery (ICA/CCA) PSV ratio >4.0 1
    • Visible plaque and luminal narrowing on gray-scale and color Doppler sonography 1

Accuracy and Validation

The sensitivity and specificity for detection of ≥70% stenosis using these criteria are approximately 85-90% compared with conventional angiography 1. In a validation study by Mayo Clinic, a PSV threshold of 230 cm/s resulted in:

  • Sensitivity: 86.4%
  • Specificity: 90.1%
  • Positive predictive value: 82.7%
  • Negative predictive value: 92.3%
  • Overall accuracy: 88.8% 2

Potential Pitfalls and Limitations

Several factors can affect the accuracy of velocity measurements:

  1. Patient-specific factors:

    • Higher velocities in women than men
    • Elevated velocities in the presence of contralateral carotid artery occlusion
    • Severe arterial tortuosity
    • High carotid bifurcation
    • Obesity
    • Extensive vascular calcification 1
  2. Technical factors:

    • In-situ carotid stents decrease vessel wall compliance and can accelerate flow velocity 1, 3
    • Variability in operator expertise significantly affects examination quality 1
    • Laboratory-specific variations in criteria and equipment 4
  3. Diagnostic challenges:

    • Ultrasound may fail to differentiate between subtotal and complete arterial occlusion 1
    • Considerable overlap of velocities between adjacent stenosis categories 1

Recommendations for Clinical Practice

  1. Use multiple parameters:

    • Combine PSV with EDV and ICA/CCA ratio for improved accuracy
    • Confirm with visible plaque and luminal narrowing on gray-scale imaging
  2. Laboratory validation:

    • Each vascular laboratory should validate its own Doppler criteria through comparison with angiography 1, 4
    • Consider certification by an independent auditing organization such as the Intersocietal Commission for Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories 1
  3. Equivocal cases:

    • Use corroborating vascular imaging methods (CTA, MRA, or conventional angiography) when ultrasound results are uncertain or borderline 1
  4. Stented arteries:

    • Use higher velocity thresholds (PSV ≥350 cm/s) for detecting ≥70% stenosis in stented carotid arteries 3

By understanding these criteria and potential limitations, clinicians can more accurately interpret carotid ultrasound results and make appropriate management decisions for patients with carotid stenosis, ultimately reducing stroke risk through timely intervention when indicated.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria.

Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.