What is the prognosis for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prognosis of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

The prognosis of MDS is highly variable, with median overall survival ranging from a few weeks to several years, and a 5-year survival rate of approximately 37% overall, with risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at 25%-35% at 5 years. 1, 2

Risk Stratification Systems

The prognosis of MDS depends primarily on three key factors:

  1. Cytogenetic abnormalities
  2. Bone marrow blast percentage
  3. Number and severity of cytopenias

International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)

The IPSS has been the standard prognostic tool and is used by health agencies for drug approval in MDS 1. It stratifies patients into four risk groups:

  • Low
  • Intermediate-1
  • Intermediate-2
  • High

For treatment purposes, these are often grouped as:

  • Lower-risk MDS: IPSS low and intermediate-1
  • Higher-risk MDS: IPSS intermediate-2 and high

Revised IPSS (IPSS-R)

The IPSS-R provides more refined risk stratification with five groups 1:

  • Very low risk
  • Low risk
  • Intermediate risk
  • High risk
  • Very high risk

Each risk category has significantly different outcomes for overall survival and risk of progression to AML 1.

WHO Classification-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS)

This system incorporates:

  • WHO classification
  • Karyotype
  • Transfusion dependency

It provides additional prognostic value, particularly for patients in lower IPSS risk groups 1.

Survival Outcomes by Risk Group

  • Lower-risk MDS: Median survival of approximately 3-10 years 2
  • Higher-risk MDS: Median survival of less than 3 years 2

Genetic Factors Affecting Prognosis

Cytogenetic Abnormalities

Specific cytogenetic abnormalities have significant prognostic implications:

  • Good prognosis: Isolated del(5q) in low-risk MDS
  • Poor prognosis: Complex karyotype, TP53 mutations 1

Somatic Mutations

Several gene mutations affect prognosis 1:

Poor prognosis mutations:

  • TP53
  • ASXL1
  • RUNX1
  • EZH2
  • ETV6
  • DNMT3A

Better prognosis mutations:

  • SF3B1 (when present as an initiating event)

The context of mutations matters significantly - the same mutation may have different prognostic implications depending on:

  • Co-occurring mutations
  • MDS subtype
  • Timing of mutation acquisition
  • Treatment received 1

Patient-Related Prognostic Factors

Several patient factors affect prognosis independently of disease characteristics 1:

  • Age: Increasing age is an independent adverse prognostic factor
  • Performance status: Poor functional status correlates with worse outcomes
  • Comorbidities: Presence of significant comorbidities negatively impacts survival

Recent Advances in Prognostication

The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) has shown improved prognostic discrimination compared to IPSS-R, with better prediction of overall survival and leukemia-free survival 3. This system incorporates molecular mutations with clinical parameters.

Causes of Death

Bone marrow failure complications (infection and hemorrhage) are the leading causes of death, with more patients dying from these complications than from progression to AML 1.

Prognostic Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Mutation context matters: The same mutation may have different prognostic implications depending on co-occurring mutations and disease context 1

  2. Evolving disease: MDS is not static - regular reassessment is necessary as the disease may progress

  3. Treatment impact on prognosis: Some treatments may alter the natural history of specific genetic subtypes (e.g., ASXL1 mutations generally indicate poor prognosis but may be associated with better outcomes during azacitidine treatment) 1

  4. Minimum genetic testing: While comprehensive genetic testing provides the most accurate prognosis, a core set of 15 genes can provide sufficient information for risk stratification 3

  5. Transplant considerations: In patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, molecular features significantly impact post-transplant outcomes and relapse risk 3

By using these prognostic tools and considering both disease and patient-related factors, clinicians can provide more accurate prognostic information and guide appropriate treatment selection for patients with MDS.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Real-World Validation of Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.