What are the characteristic EKG (electrocardiogram) findings in patients with pulmonary embolism?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Characteristic ECG Findings in Pulmonary Embolism

The most common ECG findings in pulmonary embolism include sinus tachycardia, non-specific ST-segment and T-wave changes, with more severe cases showing the classic S1Q3T3 pattern, right bundle branch block, and T-wave inversions in leads V1-V4. 1

Common ECG Findings in Pulmonary Embolism

Most Frequent Findings

  • Sinus tachycardia - the most common ECG abnormality in PE 1
  • Non-specific ST-segment and T-wave changes 2, 3
  • T-wave inversions in leads V1-V4 - indicating right ventricular overload 1

Classic Signs of Right Ventricular Strain

  • S1Q3T3 pattern - deep S wave in lead I, Q wave in lead III, and inverted T wave in lead III 1, 3
  • Right bundle branch block (complete or incomplete) 2, 1
  • Right axis deviation 3

Findings in Massive/Submassive PE

  • QR pattern in lead V1 - associated with more severe cases 1
  • Right ventricular strain pattern - more pronounced in hemodynamically significant PE 2
  • 60/60 sign on echocardiography - acceleration time of pulmonary ejection <60 ms with midsystolic notch and mildly elevated peak systolic gradient at the tricuspid valve 2, 1

Diagnostic Value of ECG Findings

Sensitivity and Specificity

  • ECG abnormalities in PE are common but usually non-specific 2
  • The presence of ≥1 of the 3 classic signs of RV strain (S1Q3T3, RBBB, or T-wave inversions in V1-V4) is associated with higher risk of adverse events 4
  • The number of RV strain signs present correlates with worse outcomes (odds ratio 1.35 per sign) 4

Limitations

  • ECG may be entirely normal in patients with PE 3
  • Individual ECG signs have variable interrater reliability (κ 0.40-0.95) 4
  • ECG alone has limited value in diagnosis due to low sensitivity and specificity 5

ECG Patterns During Hemodynamic Instability

In hemodynamically unstable PE, three ischemic ECG patterns may emerge 6:

  1. ST-segment elevation in lead aVR with concomitant ST-segment depression in leads I and V4-V6
  2. ST-segment elevation in leads V1-V3/V4
  3. ST-segment elevation in leads III and/or V1/V2 with concomitant ST-segment depression in leads V4/V5-V6

These ischemic patterns combined with S1Q3 and/or abnormal QRS morphology in lead V1 are significantly more common (90%) during hemodynamic instability than at baseline (5%) 6.

Clinical Application

When to Suspect PE Based on ECG

  • Unexplained sinus tachycardia
  • New-onset atrial arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia) 3
  • Sudden appearance of right ventricular strain pattern, especially in patients with risk factors for venous thromboembolism

Important Caveats

  • The absence of ECG signs of RV overload practically excludes massive PE as the cause of hemodynamic instability 1
  • Similar ECG patterns can be seen in other conditions causing right heart strain, such as COPD exacerbation or right ventricular infarction 1
  • ECG findings suggestive of PE may be mistaken for acute coronary syndrome, especially when ST elevations are present 5

Role in Diagnostic Algorithm

  • ECG should be performed in all patients with suspected PE but cannot confirm or exclude the diagnosis 2
  • When ECG shows signs of RV strain in a patient with shock or hypotension, immediate echocardiography should be performed 2, 1
  • Definitive diagnosis requires imaging studies like CT pulmonary angiography 1
  • In patients with suspected high-risk PE where CT is not immediately available, echocardiographic signs of RV dysfunction can support the diagnosis 2

Remember that while ECG findings can raise suspicion for PE and provide prognostic information, they should not delay appropriate diagnostic imaging or treatment when PE is strongly suspected clinically.

References

Guideline

Pulmonary Embolism with Shock: ECG Findings and Diagnostic Approach

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Electrocardiographic manifestations of pulmonary embolism.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2001

Research

Electrocardiogram patterns during hemodynamic instability in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.