What is the role of ECG (electrocardiogram) in diagnosing pulmonary embolism?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ECG in Pulmonary Embolism

Primary Role of ECG

The ECG cannot diagnose or exclude pulmonary embolism but serves primarily to exclude alternative diagnoses (such as acute myocardial infarction and pericardial disease) and to assess disease severity through detection of right ventricular strain patterns. 1, 2

Diagnostic Limitations

  • 20-25% of patients with confirmed PE have completely normal ECGs, including those with large clot burden. 3 This fundamentally limits the ECG's utility as a diagnostic tool for ruling out PE.

  • The ECG has modest diagnostic performance with sensitivity of only 50-60% and specificity of 80-90% for PE diagnosis. 2 These characteristics make it unsuitable as a standalone diagnostic test.

  • ECG abnormalities in PE are typically non-specific, with most changes representing ST segment and/or T wave alterations that can occur in numerous other conditions. 1

Common ECG Findings and Their Frequency

The most frequent ECG abnormality in PE is sinus tachycardia (28%), though this finding lacks specificity. 3, 1

Classic signs of right ventricular strain include:

  • T wave inversions in precordial leads V1-V4 (most common specific finding in submassive/massive PE) 4, 2
  • S1Q3T3 pattern (occurs in only 3.7-8.5% of PE cases) 3, 5
  • Right bundle branch block (complete or incomplete, seen in 4.8-9% of cases) 1, 3
  • QR pattern in lead V1 (indicates acute RV overload) 1, 2

Less common findings:

  • Atrial dysrhythmias including atrial fibrillation (10-23.5%) 1, 3
  • Right axis deviation (4.2%) 3
  • P pulmonale (0.5%) 3
  • Clockwise rotation (20.1%, but also common in controls) 3

Prognostic Value and Risk Stratification

The presence of ≥1 classic RV strain sign (S1Q3T3, right bundle branch block, or T wave inversions V1-V4) is associated with higher adverse event rates (13% vs 6% in those without these signs, adjusted OR 2.11). 6

  • ECG signs of right ventricular overload are typically seen in more severe cases and correlate with the degree of pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction. 1, 2

  • The number of RV strain signs present correlates with adverse outcomes (OR 1.35 per additional sign). 6

  • RV strain pattern has high specificity (97.4%) but low sensitivity (11.1%) for PE, making it useful when present but not helpful when absent. 3 This specificity increases to 17.1% sensitivity in patients with large clot burden. 3

Clinical Application Algorithm

For suspected PE patients:

  1. Obtain ECG immediately to exclude acute myocardial infarction and pericardial disease as alternative diagnoses. 1, 2

  2. Use ECG in conjunction with clinical prediction scores (Wells' rule or revised Geneva score) rather than in isolation. 1, 2

  3. Implement continuous ECG monitoring during patient transport/transfer for suspected PE. 1

  4. If RV strain pattern is present in a breathless patient, this is highly suggestive of PE (specificity 97.4%) and should prompt urgent definitive imaging. 3

  5. In hemodynamically unstable patients (shock or hypotension), ECG findings of RV strain support the diagnosis but echocardiography is the most useful initial test to detect RV overload. 7, 1

  6. Perform serial ECG evaluations in confirmed PE cases, as changes and resolution of abnormalities may have prognostic implications. 8

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never rely on a normal ECG to exclude PE - up to 25% of patients with large clot burden have normal ECGs. 3

  • Do not mistake anterior T wave inversions for acute coronary syndrome - this is the most frequent ECG finding in submassive/massive PE and can lead to inappropriate treatment. 4, 8

  • Avoid overinterpreting non-specific findings like sinus tachycardia or atrial dysrhythmias, as these occur commonly in controls without PE. 3

  • Recognize that many "classic" PE findings are actually rare - S1Q3T3 occurs in <4% of PE cases and P pulmonale in <1%. 3

  • The variable interrater reliability of individual ECG signs (κ 0.40-0.95) limits their practical utility in risk stratification. 6

Integration with Diagnostic Workup

The ECG should be viewed as one component of a structured diagnostic approach that includes clinical probability assessment (Wells score or Geneva score), D-dimer testing in appropriate patients, and definitive imaging with CT pulmonary angiography or V/Q scanning. 1, 7 The ECG's primary value lies in excluding competing diagnoses and, when RV strain is present, supporting the clinical suspicion and severity assessment of PE rather than establishing the diagnosis itself. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

ECG Changes Associated with Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

ECG in suspected pulmonary embolism.

Postgraduate medical journal, 2019

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Electrocardiographic presentation of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism.

Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, 2008

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.