What ECG changes are associated with pulmonary embolism?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ECG Changes in Pulmonary Embolism

The ECG in pulmonary embolism is typically abnormal but non-specific, serving primarily to exclude alternative diagnoses rather than confirm PE, though certain patterns—particularly signs of right ventricular strain—correlate with disease severity and hemodynamic compromise. 1

Primary ECG Findings

Most Common Abnormalities

The most frequent ECG changes in acute PE are non-specific and include:

  • Sinus tachycardia (heart rate >100 bpm) occurs in approximately 28.8% of PE patients and has a positive likelihood ratio of 1.8 2
  • Non-specific ST segment and T wave changes are the most common findings, occurring in 41-42% of patients with documented PE 3
  • T wave inversions in precordial leads V1-V4 suggest right ventricular overload and are more frequent in massive PE, with T wave inversions in V1-V3 having a positive likelihood ratio of 2.6 1, 2

Classic Signs of Right Ventricular Strain

Traditional manifestations of acute cor pulmonale occur in only 26% of patients, making them insensitive but relatively specific when present 3:

  • S1Q3T3 pattern (S wave in lead I, Q wave and inverted T wave in lead III) occurs in 8.5% of PE patients versus 3.3% without PE, yielding a positive likelihood ratio of 3.7 2
  • Right bundle branch block (complete or incomplete) is seen in 4.8% of cases and is associated with right ventricular strain 1, 2
  • Right axis deviation occurs infrequently, in approximately 7% of patients 3
  • P pulmonale (peaked P waves in leads II, III, aVF) is an uncommon finding 3

Atrial Dysrhythmias

  • Atrial fibrillation and other atrial dysrhythmias occur in 10-23.5% of PE patients and are associated with the diagnosis, though they are more common in patients with preexisting cardiac disease 1, 2

ECG Patterns in Hemodynamically Unstable PE

During hemodynamic instability, ischemic ECG patterns combined with right ventricular strain are highly characteristic 4:

  • ST-segment elevation in lead aVR with concomitant ST-segment depression in leads I and V4-V6 is a specific pattern for massive PE with hemodynamic compromise 4
  • ST-segment elevation in leads V1-V3/V4 can occur during clinical deterioration 4
  • ST-segment elevation in leads III and/or V1/V2 with ST-segment depression in leads V4/V5-V6 represents another ischemic pattern 4
  • Ischemic ECG patterns combined with S1Q3 and/or abnormal QRS morphology in V1 occur in 90% of hemodynamically unstable PE patients versus only 5% at baseline 4

Diagnostic Limitations and Clinical Context

Sensitivity and Specificity

  • The ECG has an overall sensitivity of 50-60% and specificity of 80-90% for PE diagnosis, making it inadequate as a standalone test 1
  • Normal ECG occurs in 6% of massive PE and 23% of submassive PE, effectively ruling out the use of ECG to exclude the diagnosis 3
  • A recent 2025 study confirmed that classical ECG findings have minimal diagnostic accuracy when used in isolation, with most traditional signs lacking sufficient standalone accuracy 5

Clinical Application

The ECG should be obtained immediately in suspected PE but used primarily to exclude acute myocardial infarction and pericardial disease as alternative diagnoses 1:

  • ECG findings must be interpreted in conjunction with clinical prediction scores (Wells' criteria or revised Geneva score) rather than in isolation 1
  • The presence of ≥1 classic right ventricular strain sign is associated with higher adverse event rates and helps with risk stratification 1
  • Continuous ECG monitoring is recommended during transport/transfer of patients with suspected PE 1

Risk Stratification Value

ECG abnormalities correlate with severity of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction 1:

  • Larger perfusion defects on imaging and higher pulmonary arterial mean pressures occur in patients with ECG abnormalities compared to those with normal ECGs 3
  • T wave inversions in right precordial leads are more frequent in massive pulmonary thromboembolism and indicate acute right ventricular overload 1
  • Most ECG abnormalities can resolve within 2 weeks, though T wave inversion tends to be the most persistent finding 3

Key Clinical Pitfalls

  • Do not rely exclusively on traditional manifestations of acute cor pulmonale (S1Q3T3, right bundle branch block, P pulmonale, right axis deviation), as they occur in only 26% of cases 3
  • Left axis deviation occurs as frequently as right axis deviation (7% of patients), challenging the assumption that right axis deviation is a reliable sign 3
  • The ECG cannot diagnose or exclude PE definitively—it serves as one component of a structured diagnostic approach that includes clinical probability assessment, D-dimer testing, and definitive imaging 1

References

Guideline

ECG Changes Associated with Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The electrocardiogram in acute pulmonary embolism.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases, 1975

Research

Electrocardiogram patterns during hemodynamic instability in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2014

Research

Classical ECG findings in pulmonary embolism have minimal diagnostic accuracy: A cross-sectional study.

Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.