What ECG changes are associated with pulmonary embolism?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ECG Changes Associated with Pulmonary Embolism

The most common ECG changes in pulmonary embolism include sinus tachycardia, T wave inversions in precordial leads V1-V4, S1Q3T3 pattern, and right ventricular strain pattern, though many patients with PE may have normal ECGs. 1, 2

Common ECG Findings in Pulmonary Embolism

Right Ventricular Strain Patterns

  • T wave inversions in right precordial leads (V1-V4) - most specific finding, especially in massive PE 1, 2
  • QR pattern in V1 - indicates acute right ventricular overload 2
  • S1Q3T3 pattern (deep S wave in lead I, Q wave and inverted T wave in lead III) - classic but present in only 8.5% of PE cases 3
  • Right bundle branch block (complete or incomplete) - seen in approximately 9% of PE cases 4

Rhythm Abnormalities

  • Sinus tachycardia (heart rate >100 beats/min) - most common ECG finding, present in approximately 28% of patients with PE 4, 3
  • Atrial dysrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter) - occur in about 10% of cases 4

Other Findings

  • Clockwise rotation - present in approximately 20% of PE cases 4
  • Right axis deviation - relatively uncommon, seen in only about 4% of cases 4
  • ST segment changes (elevation or depression) over left precordial leads - associated with worse outcomes 5
  • Low voltage in peripheral leads - associated with worse prognosis 5

Diagnostic Value

  • Right ventricular strain pattern has high specificity (97.4%) but low sensitivity (11.1%) for PE diagnosis 4
  • Sensitivity increases to 17.1% in patients with large clot burden 4
  • S1Q3T3 pattern has a positive likelihood ratio of 3.7 but is present in only a small percentage of cases 3
  • T wave inversions extending from V1 to V4 have a positive likelihood ratio of 3.7 3

Clinical Significance

  • ECG findings correlate with severity of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction 1, 2
  • Presence of specific ECG abnormalities (atrial arrhythmias, complete right bundle branch block, peripheral low voltage, Q waves in III and aVF, ST changes) is associated with higher 30-day mortality 5
  • 20-25% of patients with PE, including those with large clot burden, may have completely normal ECGs 4

Important Caveats

  • ECG alone has insufficient accuracy for diagnosing or excluding PE 6
  • ECG should be used as part of a comprehensive assessment including clinical prediction scores (Wells' rule or revised Geneva score) 1
  • Continuous ECG monitoring is highly recommended in patients with suspected PE during transport/transfer 1
  • ECG is also valuable for excluding other diagnoses such as acute myocardial infarction and pericardial disease 1

Clinical Application

  • In patients with high-risk suspected PE (with shock or hypotension), the absence of echocardiographic signs of right ventricular overload virtually excludes PE as the cause of hemodynamic instability 2
  • Recognition of PE-associated ECG patterns in patients with appropriate symptoms should prompt further diagnostic workup 7
  • ECG findings of right ventricular strain in a breathless patient should raise suspicion for PE 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Electrocardiographic Findings in Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

ECG in suspected pulmonary embolism.

Postgraduate medical journal, 2019

Research

Classical ECG findings in pulmonary embolism have minimal diagnostic accuracy: A cross-sectional study.

Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.