HPV Screening Guidelines in British Columbia, Canada
In British Columbia, Canada, HPV testing is recommended as primary screening for cervical cancer starting at age 25, with screening intervals of 5 years for those with negative results, as this approach provides superior protection against cervical cancer compared to traditional cytology-based screening.
Current Screening Recommendations
Age to Begin Screening
- Start cervical cancer screening at age 25 (not earlier) 1
- For individuals with HIV infection, screening should begin within 1 year after onset of sexual activity but no later than age 21 1
Recommended Screening Methods
Primary HPV Testing (Preferred):
Co-testing Option:
- HPV testing plus cytology (Pap test) for individuals aged ≥30 years
- Screening interval: Every 3 years with negative results on both tests 1
Cytology-Only Option (if HPV testing unavailable):
- For ages 25-29: Every 3 years
- For ages ≥30 with 3 consecutive normal results: Every 2-3 years 1
Management of Positive Results
HPV 16/18 Positive:
- Immediate colposcopy referral regardless of cytology results 1, 3
- Endocervical sampling is acceptable at time of colposcopy for HPV 18 due to its association with adenocarcinoma 1
Other High-Risk HPV Types Positive:
When to Stop Screening
- Screening may be discontinued at age 65-70 if:
- No abnormal results in the previous 10 years
- Three consecutive normal screening tests documented 1
- Screening should continue for at least 25 years after treatment for high-grade precancer, even if this extends beyond age 65 1
Special Populations
HIV-Infected Individuals
- Begin screening within 1 year of sexual debut or at diagnosis of HIV, but no later than age 21 1
- Use conventional or liquid-based cytology (Pap test); primary HPV testing is not recommended 1
- Co-testing can be done in individuals aged ≥30 years with HIV 1
- Annual screening recommended; after 3 consecutive normal results, can extend to every 3 years 1
- Lifelong screening is recommended 1
Post-Treatment Surveillance
For individuals treated for high-grade precancer (CIN2+):
- Initial surveillance: HPV test or co-test at 6,18, and 30 months 1
- If using cytology alone: Testing at 6,12,18,24, and 30 months 1
- Long-term surveillance: Testing every 3 years (HPV/co-testing) or annually (cytology) for at least 25 years 1
Evidence Quality and Recent Findings
Recent Canadian research provides strong support for HPV-based screening approaches:
A 2022 Canadian study showed that women prefer screening every 3 years rather than every 5 or 10 years, with co-testing being the most preferred method among adequately screened women 4
A 2024 longitudinal cohort study from British Columbia found that the risk of cervical precancer (CIN2+) 8 years after a negative HPV screen was comparable to the risk after only 3 years following a negative cytology test, suggesting HPV screening intervals could potentially be extended beyond the current 5-year recommendation 2
A 2018 modeling study demonstrated that a negative HPV test at age 55 or older substantially reduced the remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer, providing stronger reassurance than cytology alone 5
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Starting screening too early: Beginning before age 25 leads to unnecessary procedures for transient HPV infections that would likely clear on their own 1
Over-reliance on cytology alone: HPV testing provides greater sensitivity and longer-term protection against cervical cancer 2
Stopping screening too early: Continuing surveillance for at least 25 years after treatment for high-grade precancer is essential 1
Misinterpreting HPV results: A positive HPV test indicates infection but not necessarily cancer; proper counseling is important to prevent unnecessary anxiety 1
Inappropriate screening in adolescents: HPV testing and cervical cancer screening are not recommended for immunocompetent individuals under age 21 due to high regression rates of HPV infections and lesions 1
By following these evidence-based guidelines, clinicians can optimize cervical cancer prevention while minimizing unnecessary procedures and patient anxiety in British Columbia.