What are the associated conditions, causes, and treatment options for congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia with associated missing toes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of the Tibia with Missing Toes: Associated Conditions, Causes, and Treatment

Combined fixation techniques with external fixation (Ilizarov) and intramedullary fixation are the most effective treatment for congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia (CPT), achieving 84% primary union rates with lower refracture risks compared to single fixation methods. 1

Associated Conditions and Causes

Primary Associations

  • Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1): CPT is strongly associated with NF1, which is present in a significant percentage of cases 2
  • Fibrous Hamartoma: Characterized by fibrous tissue interposition between bone fragments and sclerotic bone ends with narrowing of the medullary canal 1
  • Fibular Involvement: Concurrent pseudarthrosis of the fibula is common and affects treatment outcomes 3

Pathophysiology

  • Abnormal tumor growth due to neurofibromatosis and impaired bone healing caused by dysplasia lead to abnormal bone growth and bowing of the tibia 3
  • The affected bone is biologically and mechanically inferior, even after healing, explaining the high risk of refracture 1
  • Missing toes may represent a more severe phenotype of the developmental abnormality affecting the lower limb

Treatment Options

Surgical Management

  1. Combined Fixation Technique (Recommended - 84% consensus)

    • External fixation (Ilizarov) combined with intramedullary fixation
    • 84% primary union rate with 5.62 months mean union time
    • 22.3% refracture rate, significantly lower than single fixation methods 1
  2. Cross-Union Technique

    • Creates tibiofibular fusion to increase stability
    • 100% primary union rate with 4.5 months mean union time
    • 22.5% refracture rate 1
    • Promising for younger patients or those with high-risk anatomical features 3
    • Limited long-term data as most patients haven't reached skeletal maturity during follow-up 3
  3. NOT Recommended Techniques:

    • Intramedullary rods (IMR) alone: 69% primary union rate, 8.95 months union time, 85% refracture rate 1
    • Fixed nails (Rush rods): 74% disagreement among experts 1
    • Locking compression plate (LCP) alone: only 21% expert agreement 1

Surgical Principles

  • Complete excision of the pseudarthrosis site is essential (100% consensus) 1
  • Sufficient autogenous bone grafting is required 1
  • Surgery is indicated for all patients over 2 years old 3, 1
  • Intramedullary devices should be retained as long as possible to prevent refracture 2

Adjunctive Therapies

  • Recombinant human bone morphogenic proteins (rhBMP7 and 2): Current evidence doesn't support routine use (89% expert disagreement) 1
  • Bisphosphonates: Evidence inconclusive (84% neutral expert opinion) 1
  • Vascularized fibular grafting: 45% refracture rate, considered a substitute for autogenous bone graft rather than a fixation technique 3

Complications and Long-Term Management

Common Complications

  • Refracture: Most serious complication, can occur up to 18 years after initial fusion 1
  • Non-union: Rates vary by treatment technique 1
  • Limb length discrepancies: Common, especially with IMR alone 1
  • Ankle stiffness: More common with IMR alone 1
  • Ankle valgus deformity: Reported in multiple studies 4

Long-Term Management

  • Follow-up until skeletal maturity is crucial due to risk of late refracture 1
  • Monitoring should include:
    • Ankle function
    • Limb length discrepancies
    • Deformity correction
    • Signs of refracture 1

Treatment Algorithm

  1. For patients >2 years old with CPT and missing toes:

    • Complete excision of pseudarthrosis site
    • Autogenous bone grafting
    • Combined fixation with external fixator (Ilizarov) and intramedullary fixation
    • Consider cross-union technique for younger patients or those with high-risk features
  2. For persistent non-union or refracture:

    • Repeat surgical intervention with combined fixation technique
    • Consider vascularized fibular grafting as an alternative bone graft source
  3. For severe cases with multiple failed reconstructions:

    • Amputation may be considered for recalcitrant fractures, severe limb length discrepancy (>6cm), or gross deformities of leg and ankle 5

The presence of missing toes suggests a more complex developmental abnormality, which may require more aggressive surgical management and closer monitoring for complications.

References

Guideline

Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of the Tibia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.