What is the next best investigation to confirm osteoarthritis in a patient with knee pain and clicking that worsens with movement?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Appropriate Investigation for Suspected Knee Osteoarthritis

Bilateral X-ray of knees is the most appropriate initial investigation to confirm osteoarthritis in a patient with knee pain and clicking that worsens with movement. 1

Rationale for X-ray as First-Line Investigation

The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria for chronic knee pain clearly establishes radiography as the initial imaging study of choice for evaluating suspected osteoarthritis:

  • Radiographs should include at least one frontal projection of one or both knees (anteroposterior, Rosenberg, or tunnel), a tangential patellar view, and a lateral view of the affected knee 1
  • Weight-bearing (standing) radiographs are ideal as they better demonstrate joint space narrowing and malalignments 1
  • Bilateral views allow for comparison between affected and unaffected sides 1

Key Radiographic Findings in Osteoarthritis

X-rays can detect characteristic osteoarthritic changes including:

  • Joint space narrowing
  • Osteophyte formation
  • Subchondral sclerosis
  • Bone end deformities 2
  • Calcifications of soft tissues, including deposits in degenerated meniscus, ligaments, or joint capsule 3

When to Consider Advanced Imaging

MRI is generally not indicated as an initial investigation when osteoarthritis is suspected:

  • MRI without IV contrast is not usually indicated in patients for whom radiographs are diagnostic of osteoarthritis unless symptoms are not explained by the radiographic findings 1
  • MRI may be considered when radiographs are normal but pain persists, or to evaluate for concomitant pathology such as meniscal tears 1
  • Given the increased sensitivity of MRI for osteoarthritis, it may be indicated when more accurate or serial cartilage measurements are desired 1

Why Not Other Options?

  • MRI (Option B): Unnecessary and costly as an initial test when osteoarthritis is clinically suspected; should be reserved for cases where radiographs are normal but symptoms persist 1
  • Joint fluid aspiration (Option C): Primarily indicated for suspected crystal arthropathy (gout, pseudogout) or infection, not for primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis 1
  • No investigation (Option D): Inadequate approach as imaging confirmation is necessary for definitive diagnosis and to exclude other pathologies 1, 3

Clinical Implications

Recent evidence suggests that radiographic diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis may influence patient beliefs about management. Patients who receive X-ray-based diagnosis and explanation of knee osteoarthritis may believe surgery is more necessary compared to those who receive only clinical explanation 4. Therefore, when discussing radiographic findings with patients, it's important to emphasize that:

  • Osteoarthritis is a clinical diagnosis supported by imaging
  • The severity of radiographic findings doesn't always correlate with symptom severity
  • Conservative management remains first-line regardless of radiographic appearance

By following this evidence-based approach, you can accurately diagnose knee osteoarthritis while avoiding unnecessary advanced imaging, which improves cost-effectiveness and patient care.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Clinical Evaluation of the Knee Arthritis Patient.

Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology, 2023

Guideline

Radiologic Findings and Management of Advanced Osteoarthritis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.